RE: For the layman......27 Jan 2024 08:41
Hi, MC.
You asked for comment.
Honestly, it was a bit of a blow yesterday. Not so much that dilution happened, but the price it happened at. It could have happened at any point in the past at a more favourable level. It is only because of the company communications that we found ourselves in the teens, so it does feel a bit self-inflicted.
But it was only 18% dilution. Yes, it goes against everything they have openly promised, but as things have taken longer than expected they had to react. You could argue it’s poor planning, but it is what it is.
I’m not even against the board being able to buy in at these levels. I wish they commuted more money themselves though.
The majority of the money will be used for machinery procurement, which will likely save $4-5m on capex compared to new. This is just the start of the savings we can achieve on used vs new. I’m sure Ryan will be completing that next week, and I hope the company will announce it via RNS to give a bit of comfort that the money isn’t just to keep the lights on.
it comes at a big cost to us holders, but the money needed to come from somewhere.
On the bonds, this will get some scoffs, but the board remain convinced of their success, as do I. As stated last week by Paul, the due diligence team were on site and this has now concluded. It’s the final steps in getting this completed.
Yesterday wasn’t fun. But now it’s back to waiting for the news, with a slightly reduced holding in the company. Some would have lost faith and trust, and I understand that. But as Trek said, if (or when) the bonds are finalised everything will look very different.
I’m not a company cheerleader, and try to look at things in a balanced way. 18% dilution at 11.5p was a crappy move, but if it keeps the project moving forward then it’s a pill I can swallow.