Member Info for Sparkle1

No, not at all. You can simply and honestly bring something to their attention. Or ask if they can raise. No lobbying required. They can make their own mind up to take further or not.

All, i think this board has a lot of useful information mixed with drivel.
The best thing you can all do as holders of this share is to write to your MP today and ask him to raise with Matt Han**** immediately. They will raise. Just write a short letter referring them to RMs video. Three lines should do it. Most mps you can also write to on the web sites. This would be truly helpful for this company.
Further i know that such a letter is already on the desks of the sec of state for wales and two key member in house of lords as of this morning.
Lets help our NHS. You can do more good writing this simple letter to raise it than by spending hours on here. Why anyone wants trump to corner the global supply so that the nhs cant treat you next winter is beyond rational reason. What is the point of earning a lot of money if you then lose your life? Trump has cornered market for rendesivir. I hope this goes to the nhs who has supported it, which we pay for in our taxes and which we can sell to the world to get us out of the large financial hole we appear to be in. Fingers x. Please write to your mp. Thanks.

The right to try law will be for terminally ill patients without hope of recovery. There will be a ton of protocols. This was sent to the usa legislature over two years ago.
I dont doubt that usa would want synairgens product but i was referring to the posts saying they would be ordering it due to this law going through. That would not be possible as currently described as if you were terminally ill with covid, its unlikely you would be conscious and thus Could not have synairgens current product and if you were not unconcious, its likely you would not meet the protocols. So just pointing out that to chat about giving nebulisers to unconscious patients Is a bit of a blind alley to go down.

I dont get all this right to try stuff on these posts on this board...trump clearly said you had to be just about terminally dead. My understanding is that to be almost dead with covid youd Have to be on a ventilator with eg failing kidneys. Our nebuliser wont then work as you are unconcious. I thought synairgen had acknowledged that and were working on it over time.
Further as i read the video, the aug 24 date was simply to give the big pharma companies Exactly one month to The exact hour to come up with an alternative to having their prices lowered to lowest Being offered in world. He clearly said if they failed, the he would implement but it was very hard for them so they were being given A month To come up with alternatives. More like they will spread cost of research round the globe and thus raise prices outside usa to pay for it imho...
So my take on the above is that the other posts on these two specific issues which he applied to put into law in 2018, way before covid are off the mark.

That was published April 25... too old to be useful...
Go to the other web site - see below - as its updated daily and is genuinely quite interesting.

https://www.raps.org/news-and-articles/news-articles/2020/3/covid-19-therapeutics-tracker

is quite a useful web site...

I would have thought Trump is the kiss of death frankly... i dont think history will look on him kindly for hour he has handled the virus. Further, having just thrown up listening to him spout on for half an hour as instructed by this board, i did find one interesting 'fact' (given that not a lot is very factual in what he says normally): he said this week they had managed to supply Florida 40,000 doses of Rendesivir. IF that is correct its bonkers... Florida currently on circa 15,000 new cases a day and my understanding is that each patient needs one dose per day of Rendesivir (I asked someone who was on it earlier today but maybe that changes depending how ill you are) but 40,000 seems to me at least, to not be very many. like about 15% of what might be needed in Florida. So that suggests they are not giving it to everyone and / or they haven't got enough. And /or Trump probably making it up as he went along. But interesting all the same...

thanks! I think it is more like the vaccine that was created for Dengue... they still cant produce enough so i think it was Buenos Aires got the first 500,000 doses etc - 3 years later you still cant get it in Uk if you are about to go to Amazon as there isnt enough being produced. But for eg the townships in Africa, then i would have thought mass vaccination was the way to go whereas in USA the anti-vac brigade will probably mean they will take forever to vaccinate the population due to conspiracy theories. But guess depends on the price as the virus has meant a few millions more americans have fallen out of insurance. I think there will be a place for both easily. Not at all worried about that. I mean it has taken 70 years to get rid of polio since first vaccinations... not many people with COPD, diabetes over 70 in some of these third world countries either or access to primary care so horses for courses probably?

my understanding is that it will keep you out of A&E if early enough?

newbie... i gather there are like 120 vaccines being worked on and having listened to Bill Gates being interviewed today, then he seemed pretty keen for all of them... as they dont know which will be best / have least side effects etc etc and he was saying likely to have to be multi-dose especially for the at risk groups. There are a lot of people on the planet so all 120 could make a few million and it still would only just go round... Bill Gates is pushing vaccine as he runs this massive foundation which is largely in the third world and the poor dont really have such easy access to hospitals, nebulisers etc etc. If you asked him, i would think he;d say. lets go for it as well. If Synairgen are producing enough for 78,000 people at moment, then might need a lot of companies round the planet - they all pay a bit for the Synairgen licence etc etc. I would think there was enough to go round for everyone for the products that work. China Daily News announced yesterday they will have vaccine by end of year and loan of £1bn to South America to buy it from them. I think a vaccine and treatment options are required in vast quantities - no one company is going to capture it all, its just not possible. Just look at Tesco! Tens of thousands of employees and can you get a delivery slot??? It takes a while to scale up things, however massive you are. All that will mean is that there will be more infected people needing it??

i think this will need more data for the majority of NHS consultants to use - they are a funny bunch !! - they go on about peer reviews, 'wouldnt do anything on basis of one report' etc etc. They are risk adverse. But they would want something by winter flu season - not sure they need in UK like tomorrow without the i's being dotted. My local hospital currently has 2 patients so not exactly over-run at the moment so depends a bit where you are. I think this will need more data but i think it will be quite easy to get that data and i think most consultants would rather wait eg 8 weeks than kill a few people inadvertently. It goes against their entire training. So i think an article in Guardian is a good thing as i think a disproportionate number of people in the NHS read the Guardian due to its support of the NHS....

i would agree except everyone in the NHS seems to read it and it is extremely supportive of the NHS...

or even synairgen... sorry... predictive texts...

my understanding is that you need 14 doses (?) per person so 1,000,000 doses will treat circa 78,000 people. Piecing this together, is it that Synovate own the IP rights, then the Nebuliser is made by Philips and the drug by Rentshler (?) so they are the two companies which would need to be able to scale up. What do Synovate need to scale, if anything? Or have i got this wrong?
If you were a large pharma buying this you would probably start off by going into exclusive talks to start off. Then you'd do your due diligence and this would presumably involve Philips / Rentschler (unless Philips was the purchaser). Then you would probably do a licence deal with buying options i would have thought not least to keep the current managment invested, OR the UK gov buy it out for the NHS a la Oxford vaccine co. in order to take control. But at the moment, 78,000 not very many in grand scheme of things so need to understand how quickly if at all, Philips / Rentschler could scale up? This could take a while however fast its pushed through.
I kind of think a phase 3 trial could be done very quickly as the key thing is how many die or are on ventilators and normally, people die within 4 weeks so you don't have to wait very long to find out??

JOhn 117 - if you go to investing.com and click on the technical drop down it will give them all to you...

MS2017... i came to a similar but slightly more bullish conclusion yesterday trying to write a hypothetical investment report for the company... do doing a swot analysis we all know the upside opportunity. the threat is clearly a faster competitor which needs to be avoided / and / or a big pharma buying to simply close to protect their own revenue; i ended up thinking the biggest threat was lack of hours in a day to accomplish everything in a small company and enough hours in a day to get the licencing deals / etc. So as i have inadvertently ended up owning quite a lot i have got on phone this morning to varying people who may or may not be able to help them, having been in a very similar position in my business. It seemed easier, at least to em, to get resource into Synairgen to cut the deals than, for example, Philips being able to scale up from 20,000 nebulisers to a million. I'm kind of also wondering why those not invested in Synairgen are not equally invested in Philips if the upside is bns. I dont actually know the position but just from having run a small business and converted it to a big one, then they seem to me rightly or wrongly to be the two biggest issues. I can appoint someone to peer review and if they say i need bigger sample, pretty quick to do; i can appoint patent lawyers ditto; i have a ton of well regarded medics. tick box. But one man only has 24 hours in a day and he has to do a lot of jobs. Philips have to scale up. They seem harder to do to me and make take a little while. So if i was Roche or whoever, stepping in to do my due diligence on a £300m purchase then it might take at least a few days or more. I would think they have to cut a deal with Philips too maybe. Having said that when i sold my company to a plc, it went through really quickly in 2 weeks as the chairman wanted to do it whilst he wasnt getting any interferance from CEO who was on holiday! So you never know, but the next 2 sales took weeks to accomplish not a weekend or two. So i have some sympathy both with the views expressed that say it is an amazing opportunity and some sympathy with your view that says, this might not be as quick as you think and there are some stumbling blocks. On balance i decided having run an analytics company and having had big pharma as major clients, that i might be able to help them get commercial people to see if i could help them cut the time to market or simply help due to lack of hours in a day for the key guys, not least as i have a son with a kidney transplant and a sister with diabetes. Whether anyone can help is another thing altogether. Fingers x.

Thanks crookie, really helpful. Thanks to everyone who has helped me today. Good night and hope for the best tomorrow ):

Thanks richthenewbie...

Thanks wetdream, much appreciated... just weird it appears on investing.com and cant see why. So it bugs me! Sorry..

I dont know if anyone can help me... i get transcript do all the regulatory stuff but as far as anyone seems to know it is down to richard to do the deals to get the licences / partners along with doing everything else. Ie the commercials. So it seems, to me, geeks get a big tick, transcript seem to be more geeks. So we are all reliant on richard delivering the commercials. How geeky is he? Or is he spot on commercially. Is he Klopp or Ole Gunnar? Anyone know as we seem pretty dependent on him?