RE: Tr17 Feb 2023 09:41
The missing bit from my 8:48 which got deleted when adding the link.
I wouldn't sweat it. Insti's come and go just like other significant holders. A lot of the time they have had the benefit of getting reduced buy-in prices from placings and the like. Just as fickle as pi's, tbh. I certainly don't care what they do or base my decisions on their holdings rns's. Just look at all the ii's that have held over the last few years.
Including, but not limited to:-
Oryx and Harwood, Spreadex, Crux Asset Management, Allianz Global, Lombard Odier Asset Management, Octopus Investments, Gresham House......
How many of them are still on the significant holders page, unchanged, or more importantly, have been replaced by others.