RE: The future4 Dec 2018 10:28
Hi loads - Re: the 'global warming' / now called 'climate change' debate, I remain to be convinced that we can accurately forecast anything beyond twelve months. Planet Earth has been waxing and waning for over 4 billion years we're told and some scientists show concrete evidence that the world was generally warmer pre the Industrial revolution than now. Ergo, hindsight is more accurate than prediction.
When much of the climatologists' graphs are shown to be 'very selective' shall we say, in pointing to disaster to justify their forebodings, many of these agencies rely on government funding to keep them in being and need to proclaim alarmist findings to justify their existence. Call me a cynic, if you like but Mother Nature is more likely to get the planet back into equilibrium than puny mankind.
As for Attenborough, this 'moaning minnie' has been claiming extinction of most animal species for yonks, only later on to admit that there are more of whatever endangered species he had feared for alive after all, than he originally thought. Unless he'd accurately counted all of them beforehand, how can he possibly know the truth of it?
Re: Serica, gas is about the cleanest fuel we have right now and our production comprises some 85% gas. Oil and coal might be slowly on the way out but we need those energy sources, too, to power our factories / make machines, heat our homes / keep the lights on etc., and to manufacture just about everything, including hydrogen plants, so we're some way away from a sea change in the energy mix, I'd say... sasa.