We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
You could also say Dilly's Dire Dithering Does Diddlysquat. But it won't make any difference to the facts, so maybe concentrate on them.
If they walk away it will be like a kick in the tentacles.
Sqidd?
Anyone got L2 and an opinion on current sp movement? Is this my last opportunity to load up on a dip or do I stand well back and be glad I didn't? Opinions either way welcome as usual.
Strange he doesn't post 'risen from 13 to 13.5 on no news yesterday - what's behind the rise?'
Mind you, with a TW link any credibility goes straight out of the window.
Sam - you want to pretend it is true but have no evidence to back up your assertion, it just helps persuade people to a way of thinking without offering facts. Do you have a hidden prospectus on this theme too...? A familiar pattern emerging here...
I'd have thought it would bring them and their crew great satisfaction that with a few clicks of the mouse they could silence everyone who disagreed with them, and actually gain some credibility. A strange philosophy otherwise, but then if hurling abuse and not silencing critics is the bag you're all into, then it doesn't bode well for this board until the massive rise/placing EGM come about. (Delete as applicable on the massive rise/placing egm option)
Aimlower100 - if you want to see a post with actual defamatory lies, just have a look at SamBar and his childish abuse at 16.19 today. Quite staggering that those who would try to convince the unwary that they are on the verge of enormous profit would need even to consider such abuse. I'd have thought a nice simple link to a detailed prospectus of a 100 million investment fund would be much more professional, and a lot less writing too. Just a quick copy and paste. So easy. If such a thing exists. I have substantial funds ready if you can show me the proof.
The missing prospectus might be written on gold plates and only the leader can read it (then it gets lost, à la Book of Mormon)
You can always spot a ramping crew member by their continuous fishing for details on those who don't toe the line. What sex is nomlungu? What is RW's age? Do you own shares? Are you planning to buy? Where does P9 live?
Data is valuable and can be used, keep fishing lads, it's your best way of gaining information to attack.
Why are your crew so keen to know details that have no relevance whatsoever to any investment decisions?
Uxm - would it make a difference to your attitude if you knew? Or is your reply just an attempt at distraction from pertinent facts?
TWC - You need to read what was actually posted and understand it before you reply. Your comment 'I presume you can't name the posters you accuse of having criminal pasts then?' shows you have not read or understood what I put.
My investments and all decisions around them are between me and my stockbroker, for obvious reasons.
The last time I openly considered investing here it was at 1.3p from memory, and I was advised to get in because 'after all, 201 is nailed on, funding is secure with the gruesome twosome gone, and it can't go much lower.' I didn't invest and shortly thereafter there was a 125/1 consolidation.
Nom - there's more evidence for that than P9's address, and it's a much more urgent matter to be addressed too. That and the criminal past of some of the rampers...
PM 2022 - just for accuracy, the allegation 'It has been widely claimed he lives a few doors away from our CEO' is about as accurate as someone talking repeatedly about your convictions for flashing in your local park, and (assuming it's untrue of course) repeating it with a bunch of mates on here until newcomers think there must be some truth in it. You'd be better off talking about the peer reviews of 201, so fill us in on those if you would please. It might be a little more constructive and nothing breach of posting rules.
I suspect the only thing that's rotten is the smell of fish..
A peer review by a man who is one of the company's biggest shareholders is hardly likely to be damning, and I seem to remember when I asked him if there were any peer reviews of 201 the answer was no. Not one in three years despite them being promised in the RNS at that time.
But his timeline layout for a placing being necessary seems very plausible even if the merger does actually secure any funding, and be honest about 201 - no update in 3 years, not even a peer-reviewed document (which was promised) on a trial of just 12 patients, only one of which showed any real change. Have you considered P9 might have a point?
PM2022 - you say 'Porky is only here because he lost all his money on 4D and is bitter with VAL' - if you actually did lose all your money on 4D wouldn't you be likely to be bitter towards 4D?