We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
Baffling isn't it?
PI8 - If as you say 'I think we had a non-binding agreement, but that has recently changed into a contract' can you think of any reason why this would not have been immediately publicised via RNS, and would the company not also be required to release an RNS if this had actually happened?
A lot of very understandable frustration, and while I'd rather have information from the bod as well as scientific facts from trials etc, if I had to be in the dark regarding one or the other, I'd pick bod silence over absence of trial advancement any day. It's how it's always been here, so while frustrated I think most lth are pretty much reconciled to it.
Are you allowed to mention that Porky? We shall see.
Jockvest - high probability your post is removed within an hour or less.
Strange goings-on when a post is removed (on a Sunday evening too) saying that the unsubstantiated positives here almost makes them want P9's prediction to come true, yet a poster with an opposite standpoint suggesting that P9's wife might wish she had a cyanide pill is left in place. Something is rotten here, surely?
Never known dissenting posts removed so quickly- no effort to rebut or discuss at all! And all weekend too - that's quite exceptional even for LSE.
The same perfectly reasonable question for discussion on clinical updates on 201 301 and 401 keep getting removed, and suspiciously quickly too. Very disappointing, and makes you wonder what is really afoot. Remember the very strange meeting between Tom Winnifrith and Satu, after which TW promised notntonsay anything negative about Val? Is history repeating itself in some way? We shall see...
As an alternative consider this - if chatgpt had said 'Scancell is a bankrupt lifestyle company with no useful science and will be heading down the pan any day now', we'd have had at least fifty posts today from our resident and closet 'balanced' team telling us about the accuracy and precision of chatgpt. Bear that one in mind - you know it's true!
I ran the same question through LozGPT and NOW every few words it CHANGES to capitals at RANDOM, and it just kept blathering on about LAWN cutting, squirrels and firewood.
So basically the latest cutting edge artificial intelligence says 'DYOR.'
'highly impressive' and 'meaningful improvement' are good to read.
What party?
Laura - you say 'some can't get funding' - but VAL have had extension after extension waiting for TheoremRX to get less than a year's funding, with no change in aspects like 201 unmoved since what? 3 years ago? So may of the comments here need the words 'in my opinion' or a few 'ifs' or 'all being well' addenda as there really doesn't seem to be anything concrete, just a lot of hope and optimism based on nothing concrete. The next week or so will tell, so let's see anyway.
I'm quite certain that you bought at the very lowest and sold on the tip of a peak, timing it all to expert perfection. It's what you always do, though you usually say it yourself.
A familiar line, if a little dated after all this time
https://youtu.be/V7NlFWh7Sz8?si=IVYptpwTLPvC8j8r
Results published, no suspension then (to the disappointment of some, no doubt)
That well known fount of financial advice The Dhaka Tribune.'
It has strong echoes of a few blurred lines from allegedly thirsty 'journalist' TW. Probably coincidence though.
'All the timelines would have been discussed and analysed already by the BOD.'
Very true. It's what they decide to do as a consequence that will prove interesting.
Sounds more like a bit of fearmongering to be honest.