Member Info for ratcliffewriter

Nice looong rampy post there iceman - good at trying to bury posts you disagree with. Standard practice...

As opposed to 'If I can hook just a couple of newbies in for a few grand each on a dream, that's a little tick up and exit on a profit before they realise it's a dud.'

Porky has called it pretty much spot on for the last few placings, whereas the '60 million in an offshore account', 'Black Cat raising 5 million', 'TheoremRx to the rescue' 'massive deal on the way for 201/401/whatever else' has been less accurate than Mystic Meg with a hangover.

Of course it's your money, no argument there. The only question is for how much longer?

Before you get too carried away with UXM484's attacks on Porky's predictions, his own posting history hardly shows great insight and is arguably a bit light on integrity. Previously accusing P9 of 'twisted agenda driven posts', it doesn't take much research to see a few examples of what could be seen as dubiously motivated posts -

ON RENX for example - 3 Nov 2025 14:26

"Market cap based on potential.

This will almost certainly go up from here at some point so a decent buy.

Most buyers at 9.5 so they are unlikely to sell here."

Price now? 6.75

SNT - 2 Oct 2025 12:47

"News only breaking out. The big boys are yet to arrive."

Price then was 12.5 on a spike. Looks like the 'big boys' never arrived - Price now 8.25

ORCP - on 3 Oct 2025 he posted a new thread - "Stop loses triggered now all the way back up again

This is why we must not panic. Should head back to 0.070. With further news we could be back to 0.10 again."

Price then 0.0575. Price now 0.036

Most of the price charts of these 'hot tips' look more like downhill ski slopes than investment opportunities. So while it is nice to be told that deals are signed when they aren't, and great things are just around the corner, maybe look at what exists rather than what is hinted at. What exists is a still-shallow pool of cash and a ticking clock, combined with a track record of disappointment, placings and consolidations.

Just out of interest, what's the market value of 576,000 Ambrose shares at the moment?

It needs roughly to double from the last placing price just to reach the price from which the blinkered said it could go no lower. Then a 300 percent rise form there to reach the price of the warrants that were included in all the faithful followers' calculations. Obviously past performance is not necessarily a guide to future performance, but there's a definite trend here - the worst part of which is the attempts to sucker in fresh money to allow an exit for the 'die-hards.'

I presume the Ambrose Healthcare referred to can't be the one whose Companies House accounts showed assets of £23,605 in March 2025 (down from 142367 in 2024) with an average of two employees in 2025, up from zero in 2024? Or is it?

https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14409383/filing-history

PM2022 on 22nd October 2024 - 'Firstly, 401 deadline for Ambrose is end of year so don’t speculate too soon.

Secondly, ME confirmed this week that 201 / THX should happen soon.'

Where does that leave ME's credibility? He's already getting a return on his 'investment' - It's called a salary and expenses, and presumably some bonus to follow?

It seems odd to say on the one hand 'We need to save money and tax you more' and on the other to say 'carry on breeding and you'll get more of other people's money.' If I didn't know better I'd say it was a vote buying exercise among the great unwashed. Surely not...?

Got it now, thanks.

Marcus - any chance of posting a link to that please? It's in the interests of many, and for a number of reasons I'd say.

Jaspal Singh bought 30 million shares by 20th May when it was trading at 0.55, and now sells about half of them around 0.22. A feature said at the time - 'This acquisition may influence the company’s strategic decisions and could impact its market positioning, as stakeholders observe the potential implications for future governance and operational directions.'

Should this now read 'This disposal may influence the company’s strategic decisions and could impact its market positioning, as stakeholders observe the potential implications for future governance and operational directions'?

Just thought I'd post that question up before we get another new poster who has miraculously 'stumbled on an amazing investment opportunity here....'

Looks like the season of comedy reruns is upon us once more.

Maybe this year Hans Gruber won't fall off the Nakatomi Plaza, the Italian Job thieves will get the coach off the cliff edge, and Valirx will have commercial success arriving before a Spring placing is required.

RNSs are always issued on a day of the week with a 'y' in it. That's without the use of AI as well.

To be fair, I'd imagine that any work around the video, editing, presentation and posting up, would be done by Edison and not Scancell.

Chester - haven't you learnt? You're not allowed to mention 6 and 7 figure share purchases, only sells. It's how the misery-mongers have tried so hard to set things up, and it's easier just to sit and wait and see what comes - possibly quite soon.

Does that make 30677 into 28,759,687,500 ?

The consolidations were (as far as Google tells me and without RNS trawling) as follows:

April 5, 2020 (effective April 6, 2020): A 0.008:1 ratio, meaning 125 old shares were consolidated into 1 new share (1:125 reverse split).

May 17, 2015 (announced as a reorganisation of share capital in April 2015): A 0.008:1 ratio, also equivalent to a 1:125 reverse split.

July 30, 2007: A 0.03333:1 ratio, which is approximately 1:30 reverse split.

October 2, 2006: A 0.5:1 ratio, or a 1:2 reverse split.