Member Info for ratcliffewriter

Bancel does talk as if personalised treatment were somehow good because it is individually tailored. A debate between him and PH would be interesting...

That's the way - cut and paste some good long pieces in the hope of burying anything that doesn't fit the agenda.

Probably thinking like Pan Am did - the only state airlines that never made a loss, they recorded a 'negative profit.'

Maybe he's talking 'negative growth.'

I'm sure he'll elaborate on his claim pretty soon and to everyone's satisfaction anyway.

To be fair RP, applying for grants is a very sensible thing to do. However there must be an element of due diligence and examination of the company applying, and somewhere in the paperwork there will probably be a section which asks 'What would the grant be used for?' This is where the potential donor writes something like 'to accelerate the development of our compound XYZ' or 'to fund the production of our drug to use in the imminent 500 patient Phase 3 trial.'

If the box reads 'to stave off imminent insolvency and to avoid another placing' or 'to pay salaries, expenses and bonuses' I imagine the progress of the application tends to grind to a halt.

Two more late declared trades.

Very true Chester - it also explains the complete absence of a number of posters who are normally keen to throw in their two penn'orth at critical points.

A figure of one or two hundred million doesn't sound unlikely, so if they are seriously considering a single project which alone costs a multiple of the current market cap of the entire company, there must be (on that basis) some very hefty negotiations with some serious players. As has been said though, time will tell. As Frankie said, relax.

It's an interesting dilemma - going it alone keeps all profits etc in house, but also carries 100 percent of the risk - very 'all or nothing', but given the commitment and due diligence of Vulpes and Redmile, it seems to be under serious consideration. It could be a lever to prompt a better deal from outside, but to generate pressure on a potential partner the 'go it alone' option would need to be a credible option. Going by TD and others' attitude that looks to be true. Given the high profile of Redmile (in particular) and Vulpes, other investment funds might well be keen to provide considerable funding, all being well. Redmile could maintain their near 30 percent stake in any enlarged share issue and thus provide almost a third of new investment if they so chose - but it would (one would hope) be at a premium to the current sp. Vulpes could increase their holding at the same time from 17 to 30 percent without any 'bid' dilemma - all just ideas, but increasingly possible ones.

Going it alone (successfully) would also increase the price for a buy-out massively. Obviously - but nice to contemplate if all goes as well as it has so far.

The next few months and beyond should be fun to watch anyway.

....and just joined this morning. Very altruistic!

Another tick up I see - and they will still take a considerable number of shares on auto.

'When the SP inevitably hits 1.6p plus there will be further buying pressure as placees exercise their 1.3p warrant options. Some will then sell for a quick profit but by then the SP will be in the 2p range.

All this without the flush of positive news expected over the coming months.'

Sounds good? Sounds worth buying into? Well actually it's a paternostpauper quote from 16th January 2025. But the share price then was 0.875, sliding gently down another post-placing ski-slope graph. And what's the biggest news since then? Oh yes, another placing - predicted by P9 and derided by PP. Until it happened.

On past history Porky's predictions seem a pretty reasonable bet. PP's posts are just reformulated bin dippings - he might as well just copy and paste on a pumping merry-go-round.

UXM's post and comment are quite understandable. With Any New Knowledge Expect Reaction.

Interesting that you've posted notgotalot - in December you distinctly said "I’ll take some time out and won’t be back until the next decent RNS."

Presume you've restarted posting because you've lost hope in there being a decent RNS.

It would also be interesting to know why the posting of relevant financial facts from those observing is described as 'panic.' Surely the only panic is among those trying to snare the naive with fantasy predictions so they can get out fast with a profit - and now realising that the supply of gullible newbies is drying up.

Viera - are you RayPointer and me as well?

I was asking myouryourself the same question. But I knew that, as did Iyou.

True O alter ego. He even knows where my investments are. (Or should that be 'our' investments)

The number of employees and the financial state is a bit concerning isn't it? They weren't flush in 2024's accounts, and they're worse in the 2025 ones.

So back to the question - what are 500,000 odd shares in Ambrose actually worth? Potentially even less than 500,000 Val shares...?

https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14409383/filing-history

Why were Val given shares not cash by Ambrose?

What are 576,000 Ambrose shares worth?

Can they be sold to raise much-needed cash?

How much cash had been raised for Val in the 7 months since that announcement?

If it was a deal of any real worth, why did Val have to do a placing a few months later, and how come it's heading towards another one in a matter of weeks on current estimations?

No problem RP - I'm wondering who paid 0.50 for a few shares worth about 25 percent less from the start, but I suppose 400 quid pays for the week's teabags and digestives.