Member Info for ratcliffewriter

It's always difficult to say much in support of the share without waking the children, but yes, a gentle rise is there. VD - the sp IS responding. Have you tried dummy sells for quote significant quantities? Also I would say thatbif this volume of sells were slipped in the sp would undoubtedly descend at a significant pace, and if they were 'off book' or whatever lateral fog snivel-temp wants to put forward, I doubt it would not cause this subtle rise. As ever, let's wait and see anyway.

Just rereading the RNS - If the reliance on future funding coming from placings then this surely means the Lab has been a significant extra drain on finances and after 2 years or so is not even covering its costs, let alone making a profit.

Also, if loss per share is 1.45p as compared to 2.01p in 2023, does this indicate reduced inefficiency or is it simply a reflection of the increased number of shares in issue?

I'm fully in agreement with your statement there PM, when you say 'small news and this can move a fair amount.'

It's moved some 15 percent in a matter of minutes this morning. Unfortunately it's downwards.

I'm waiting for certain posters to pop up and try to convince me those big trades were actually sells, but I may need to go to an audiologist as the silence is deafening just now.

The 'bottom fishers' of yesterday could have saved another 10 percent or so by waiting another day, same as I can look at spending about 98 percent less than if I'd bought in when initially suggested here.

Is this drop the lining up of the next placing do you think?

They can't win - going to ASCO is slated as a 'jolly', not attending would be slated as a failure. Hey ho...

I imagine a few of the rent-a-gobs here and 'over there' will be applying for that one - they can then empower Scancell with the benefits of their extensive wisdom and vision - 'my skills include bird spotting and wood gathering in France, sneering at anything resembling success, and dismissing anything innovative as futile and redundant. I also expect any scientific achievements to be complete within weeks and require no financial outlay.'

Also - minor detail but it's not 'Trojans bearing gifts', it was 'I fear the Greeks, even when bearing gifts.' Timeo Danaos et dona ferentes.' Virgil's Aeneid Book 2.

Just in case anyone was wondering.

Sorry to bring sad news, but our fellow contributor and my friend Chelsea7 (Paul) passed away in his sleep this morning - I have just been told the news by a friend of his in London. For the last few months it has been a matter of 'when' not 'if', and sure enough his condition had been deteriorating at an increasing rate these last few weeks - I suppose he'd dodged the grim reaper several times over the last 12 years or more, but eventually one's time has to come. On his behalf I extend his best wishes for the future to all who knew him, and as Dave Allen used to say, 'May your God go with you.'

R.I.P. C7.

Inaphaea will share access to results from a proprietary screen of approximately 3000 FDA approved drugs ("3k Screen") generated in a panel of Patient Derived Cells. (So first a proprietary screen - that'll take a while and presumably reduce the number that might hold any promise)The drugs are approved for non-cancer applications and Dominion will mine the data for potential cancer applications (looking for needles in a haystack, more or possibly all could found to be useless) carrying out routine analysis to validate the most promising candidates at its own expense (that'll save Val from using any of its vast cash reserves then); the parties will agree and share any additional in-depth studies if required. (Any wild guess at a timescale to get to this stage? One year? Two? Three?)The results of the analysis will be jointly owned and both parties will share equally all costs associated with filing, prosecution and maintenance of any arising patents for any repurposed drugs. (Even if anything is found to be needing a patent, that application alone takes how long? A year, 18 months maybe. And that's if it gets granted)

That RNS has so many ifs maybes mights and coulds hiding in plain sight. That's why nobody got excited over it if they've any sense of proportion. Come back in five years and see if it produced any results I'd suggest.

Or was the RNS more of declaration of intent to go bin dipping in a bran tub of other people's discarded trash?

Ab, my big ami, it would help if you read a post to see what it said instead of saying what you'd like it to say and then posting your version.

Rushing to Inanaco's aid?

Read what I wrote properly - 'For various reasons they all got banned and migrated there, apart from the occasional multiple id posters..'

What does that say other than that all (inanaco and the others) got banned for various reasons. Where does that comment side with anyone?

Also, again if you had read my original post I talked of 10 years ago, not 13 years ago which you are now pulling into your angle of attack.

With all due respect you really need to read and understand a post before jumping down people's throats as you do. My post was a mild musing whilst watching and waiting, not an invitation to you and scinv to start a piling-in session.

Do what Frankie said. Relax.

You twist more than Chubby Checker - please show me where I said anything about 'holding for the last 12 years'. You aren't misquoting even, you're producing pure fiction, and badly too. Grow up.

That's just my impression and perception from following this share and the board over the years. I'm not concerned who's ultimately 'right' and 'wrong', I've always said it's up to each individual to decide for themselves where this is going and whether to invest between zero and 100 percent of their wealth.

Nice to see you being a little less abusive and venomous anyway scinv. The short ban you got has obviously served a purpose, but like Scancell, it will be interesting to see how things develop.

Hit 'post' by accident! - ...of course in those days it was this board that was getting infested with the 'we're doomed' crew, who fought daily battles with Inanaco and others. For various reasons they all got banned and migrated there, apart from the occasional multiple id posters, but my recollection of back then was of considerable financial insecurity with very promising science but on a small scale with a lot less hope of commercialisation. Even the two 5m upfront glymab payments would have been manna from heaven back then, now they're seen as small change.

Anyway, all interesting and let's see what develops. There's certainly plenty to watch unfold.

Interesting to find comments on those lines. Of course

Strange to think that about 10 years ago Scancell were pursuing cancer vaccine science when the bulk of the pharma world wouldn't give them the time of day, and now there's a Cancer Vaccine Summit Award 'do'.

Well done Scancell and Lindy for sticking to their guns and believing in what they were developing. Here's to the next months and years as it all develops further.

Just for clarification - as there is no mention of actual money, not even a prospective figure or percentage way down the line, so are the agreements announced in the RNS of any more use than a 'letter of intent'? ME refers to them as ‘deals’ but the RNS wording says ‘evaluation and commercial use agreement’ – so presumably prospective and no cash generating in the near future. It would be disappointing if this was little more than a paper exercise to try to give momentum to the next raise.

Scientific development doesn't hurt a share price, but above all it's money flowing in that makes an SP rise. Cash in from partnering or licensing, cash from major investors like Redmile, cash in from selling selected assets and so on. Money makes the world go round, as they say.

Are we due for some significant cash expansion? That's for each individual to decide for themselves.

'Just because it's on the Internet doesn't mean it's true.' Abraham Lincoln, 1862.