Member Info for ratcliffewriter

Scinv - you missed out the illuminati and freemasons.

Just an interested observer - I was simply wondering if lemons has bought several million more or whether there aren't as many sticky fingers as he thought. It could also be forward selling ahead of a placing couldn't it? As was pointed out in another chat site, VAL need to raise a good six or seven figure sum very soon just to keep the lights on.

It does seem as you say though. Nothing has changed in years.

Looks like six 500,000 deals have gone through, plus one for nearly a million. Are these more buys from you Lemons? Not helping the price though - could they possibly be sells do you reckon?

Never mind Burble's and Bermuda's investment - who convinced Redmile and Vulpes to invest? Or are they naïve and gullible. From Vulpes' point of view I suppose a year's due diligence is unlikely to uncover much, and from Redmile's side of things it's probably 'well it's only 50 million of clients' money, what does business integrity and credibility matter if we just lob it up the wall?'

Have you spent the last 15 hours constructing that latest post as a follow-on from the previous one? You must be very tired.

Have a kip maybe...

Sciv v Fonz would end up as Sconz. Then he'd be arguing about whether the cream or jam went on first, and everyone else would be wrong, naturally.

Let's just say I'm happy to sit and wait. Also I don't think you are the most rational individual to engage with too closely, as once you start to lose an argument you have a track record of becoming highly abusive and foul mouthed. Anyway - your nemesis awaits, if (as I say) you have the guts. TTFN.

Just a wholly owned subsidiary. That's 'wholly owned.' Anyway, off you toddle to talk to 'you know who' over there. If you think you're informed enough that is. My guess is you haven't got the cohones to even try.

So, no scientific action, no likelihood of therapeutic or commercial success, doom, gloom, death, destruction etc etc. Yet posting 'elsewhere' is a far longer term poster who proclaims no risk, commercial success nailed on, predictions of very entertaining share price in the future and so on. The Yin to scinv's Yan, the two of you being an embodiment of the opposing forces in the 1983 film 'The Keep.'

I think it might be more productive for Scinv to return to the 'other' board and seek his nemesis in a duel to the death, or at least to a standstill. Unless of course scinv is scared of being beaten with facts by a positive outlook to match (or possibly overwhelm) his whining over here. I'd guess he is, and doesn't dare return to the dark side for a good hoofing.

Those of you who have followed Scancell for a good few years will be all too familiar with how the arguments would ebb and flow, with sometimes polar opposites of pros and cons being debated with varying degrees of vehemence, but always with a certain number of posters on the 'pro' side, and another number on the 'con' side, but never one solitary voice alone in a wilderness of cynical negativity. Even AimBig would have a few singing along with him (albeit probably duplicate identities). It's almost enough to make one feel sorry for lonely old scinv. Almost. But not quite.

Look at 201 today. Inches deep in dust, covering insignificant results on an insignificant number of patients treated at a rate of about one a year in a laboratory of questionable repute.

*'...rerate and...' rather than 'related amd.'

Makes it sound like the next raise will be the last one before a related amd therefore so worth throwing loads of money into. Just like the last however many....

I presume scinv will be messaging Scancell to ask for more details which will then be shared with this board in an informative and helpful way.

As predicted.....bring on Private Fraser..

If Porky is right and the next raise comes in at .20, it will make half a million shares become worth just 1000 quid, and if they then consolidate at the usual rate of 125:1 it'll take that down to 8 quid.

But why worry? I'm sure Black Cat, no - TheoremRx, oh no not them, hang on, I meant this latest lot with 25 grand in their company accounts - they're bound to come riding in with a few million to keep the lights on for another six months, just as long as the bonuses are proportionate next time round.

I'd say that's a buy but I'm sure the usual names will have some mystic formula to say it's a sell and portent of doom.

So if they've actually raised 400k and they gave the lot to VAL, that would keep VAL going for a couple of months wouldn't it? Not to advance anything, just to pay salaries and admin. And maybe bonuses.

'potentially....'

You're on the right lines pauper - I regularly asked questions regarding the investability here, usually with reference to the utterly stagnant compounds, the repeated cash calls, the absence of any institutional investors of repute (or disrepute) and so on. None of the fan club ever addressed any of my queries, and I came to understand that this was a share that seemed a pretty certain bet on which to lose money, and still fail to see anything that stands scrutiny as an investment prospect, even if one had an appetite for highest risk shares.

As for 'multi millionaire'? Tut tut, the usual bottom feeder rabble rouser tricks of trying to extract any snippet of information from someone who rocks the 'dead cert' boat. So, multi millionaire? Let's just say substantially better off than if I had invested in Val at any point over recent years.

All I've really suggested is that I'm open to ideas that might show this has any even mild investment case, and that anyone tempted to put money in here needs to read the RNSs carefully over the last 8 years or so and see if they can spot a pattern emerging, not listen to the 'just another few days/weeks/months/years and this will take off, it's a very different company from how it was.' Again. And again.....