GreenRoc Accelerates their World Class Project to Production as Early as 2028. Watch the full video here.
Also worth remembering that this patient was in palliative care, and keytruda was almost but not quite managing to check the tumour growth. With this in mind, draw a 4cm line on a piece of paper, and then a 1.8cm line next to it. Then, as the fat bloke with the moustache sings, 'Go Compare.'
So basically less of a problem than many had with covid vaccines. That's not bad for a pound shop bio product from a lifestyle company...
And presumably no side effects still.
My thoughts too WF - can you imagine LD taking the lectern at AACR and saying 'the Moditope trial is disappointing and not going too well'?
I'm assuming that today's close was positive, otherwise Aimbig would have followed up his post this morning with tales of doom and gloom.
Don't worry badman, VAL shares only have to hit £77.73p each with a mcap approaching 8 billion and you'll break even. That's as long as the bod don't do another placing before then.
That particular nugget posts on the 'dark side' - used to post here but got banned some years ago, to the surprise of very few.
Whatever logjam or hitch there was first thing has now cleared it seems, but it was unusual.
Can't get a price to buy even 1000 shares. Is it just a glitch or is there some demand going on?
They can only present information already in the public domain at these events, so eill we have another RNS before then with a further update? I imagine so. And will it say 'cutting edge science' or 'ooh eck, it's not going to plan at all'?
Somehow I'd lean towards the former...
Not quite hasiba - crackin was talking of a placing at 15p (the previous one he promoted was 5p and that didn't happen either) so basically it's 'wrong again sunshine' - the fact remains that shares rise on money coming in, and slide gently in the absence of positive money related news. This decline is absolutely no surprise to me whatsoever, but as others (dare I say genuinely astute posters) will know, the science and commercial potential looks rock solid for the future.
P.S. when I say 'astute' I don't mean the self proclaimed 'astute' scumbags from elsewhere and their acolytes.
Very true crackin, very true.
Given the track record of financial management and tailoring work to fit the funds available, I would think they know exactly how further money needs will be addressed. Whatever made Redmile invest in a tiny bio on the far side of the world from them has now grown into a series of trials, further science, and of course the first licensing deal. The investment case grows stronger, but also worth wondering (among other possibilities) at what point the first stage payment might come from Genmab, and how much might that be for?
Indeed roses - a few intermittent visitors will feel cheated that their expert posting has been thwarted.
It's not just that though is it? Inanaco makes long term predictions on some pretty thorough research, crackin is just a sh*t stirrer who couldn't care less.
WTP - Makes you wonder why he doesn't give crackin as much stick for his predictions as he does inanaco for his.
'As you know I make little attempt to hide my identity' versus 'info that clearly identifies me specifically.'
If there is any particular difference between those two statements I would not be in the least bit interested to know. You also label inanaco as 'my friend' - he isn't, he is a poster for whom you nurse an apparent simmering hatred and the tone of most of your posts stems from that.
As for others having a 'negative agenda' - you've been here long enough to know that is absolutely true.
So if you think calling out your non sequiturs quakifies as 'keyboard warrior style' then carry on believing it. That's about the end if it - better things are most likely coming than exercising your paranoia.
Come now Ivy - you ask 'what are your current valuations of SCLP based on current DTH response?' yet you have known me posting here long enough to remember full well that I have never ever made any prediction on possible price for the share, for very obvious reasons. I have always been perfectly consistent on that. You, however, seem to be hypocritically inconsistent - you have had posts removed repeatedly for posting personal information about me, despite being very aware that it constitutes a breach of posting rules - yet this morning you were over on the dark side begging inanaco not to post personal information about you on the grounds of privacy.
I don't intend to get into a lengthy post trawl on this one, I'll just say that I posted an opinion on what was to me a deliberate belittling of something that appears very significant, and the strong belief that had the DTH reaction been less than 100 percent those same voices would have made great negative play of it. If seven others agree sufficiently to 'rec' my view, then I am obviously not the only one who thinks this. Maybe you should ask the other seven why they agree with me too? Or just leave it as an observation which Ruck and Ivy disagree with - not an unusual occurrence after all.