Member Info for PJT12

I return bearing a new name and some good memories of this board in its noisiest heyday - although seems to be going well now. Have PL75 and RD come out of their shells yet or are they still shy as ever?
Anyway, another person I was just thinking about who was on here was that guy who went all in, even got some coverage in the Sun and, if I remember rightly ended up getting attacked on Twitter by a load of shorters. Can you remember his name or do you know if he still treads these boards?

wetdream, I beg to differ. When Angle's product was for research purposes only the company was mentioned all over the media, usually after peer reviews. POLX needs a decent press office, imo.

Its a great tax for JOG with a tax return of 91p in the £ on the development investment. The govt wont raise as much as they hoped from the oil companies - who ain't stupid.

I'm not as knowledgeable about the oil industry as many on here and I have no real issue with the Windfall Tax in the circumstances, more so with the tax breaks on offer. Looking at the timing, I think it could actually work out well for JOG - or a future partner. That said, I do know that one thing the markets hate more than anything is uncertainty and the 'sunset clause' provides just that, open-ended as it is. Whilst the government would undoubtedly point to the unpredictability of future oil prices and the various events behind them, that should not provide them with a license to leave companies in such a position that they cannot plan for the future, largely through making it up as they bumble along. Where the 'sunset clause' is concerned, a solid proposal is needed soon and NOT only once we hit the three year 2025 point, as seems to be their way of late.

Ophidian - as a long term Avacta poster who saw at first hand the height of your board "activity" (especially your disruptive playground-like battles with PL75 & co), Phantom25 is spot. You did use phraseology on several occasions that suggested you had access within "the business" to inside information that the rest of us did not, mostly on the LFT front. It ruined the board and this should serve as a warning to others here. This guy is disruptive and you only need to ask for a character reference from those who remember that period on the Avacta board if you doubt me. Others on here will know that I have always posted fairly and honestly on here - as Phantom has done in this instance.

Agree totally, Thompi, regarding "inside track". It's easy enough to substantiate though for those suggesting it with some details of dates, times, specific content and locations of those posts .

Plus the traders selling out.............

Too conspiratorial to suggest shares are being gathered ready for the US to rise n shine and come online?

Probably end 47-all in City's case - with all the goals in the last 5 minutes.

Why don't Samsung just buy us? :-)

IC April 12
"Samsung currently has a quantum dot market share of around 90 per cent. However, most dots use cadmium, which is a lethal heavy metal and governments are expected to limit its use. If Nanoco wins this case, all companies that want to produce cadmium-free dots will have to purchase a licence to Nanoco’s IP."

strategicinvesto, why even suggest that which is "negative" in itself, especially in the face of what is basically a positive RNS?

hedged, I couldn't agree more and really don't see the point of most brokers' notes that virtually always over-hype the SP values of most companies - unless they think that sycophancy is alive and well and it keeps the BoDs happy. Pointless.

"the Board believes that the Group has sufficient cash available for the foreseeable future." It's the non-seeable bit that I wonder about :-)

"I see..........". You sound like Mystic Meg.

"Cannot wait for tomorrow. It's finally moon time."

SweetTango, I dunno about the "moon" but looking at most of your comments on here, you are definitely on another planet. I am just looking at the historical chart over the past year here and..................... How might the last week alter that trajectory?

"Electrification of certain offshore operations is also part of the plan to reduce BP’s carbon footprint in the North Sea."

MM wider 'market state' opportunism?

Talking "perverse", check out the spread here!

It was always likely that this would drop during the interim negotiations and I would be surprised if this does not continue for a couple of weeks. That said, the rebound will pale this into insignificance once it arrives - and it will.