Member Info for Piltick

I don't think this is PHE's planning application. I think this application is for a different waste-to-energy project, application by Peel for Plot 8 at Protos, for a company called Covanta.

hTTp://thisisprotos.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/EfW-Planning-Application_Presentation-Boards.pdf

Thanks Kenny.

Kenny, I can't find any interviews 6 hours ago, have you got a link?

Probably specifically tailored for you.
I'm getting adverts for viagra!

the SP shown on here is completely wrong. The actual mid price is about 6.16, not 5.7.

That's true, BumbleB, so we may never get to the bottom of it.

Hi telephoneman: I just hope that you have all of your spreadsheets safely backed up on a hard disk or in the Cloud!

If these fluctuations are actually due mainly to a distressed seller, then I expect we will know who it is shortly when the RNS is issued.

But although I saw a few large sells yesterday, I don't think I've seen sufficient selling volume to merit such significant movement in the SP. Unless I've missed something, which is possible.

I'm sure that's correct, BumbleB, but I still think that there was something more than that going on during the past week.

Regarding the options, the timing seems rather odd, but probably planned in advance and as it has no immediate impact I don't have a problem with that.

The question is not why the SP rose today, the question is why it dropped so much yesterday, and in fact the week before. So this big rise today brings us back to where we were one week ago. That's like saying "oops, that was an error, let's go back to where we were then everything will be just fine again".

But everyone is not back to where they were a week ago, because many private investors will have lost a substantial amount by taking fright and selling out, probably near to the bottom, while others will have had their stop-losses triggered. I have no doubt that some individuals will now have reduced trust in the company, and certainly the AIM market won't have gained any admirers over this.

There has to be a reason for this sort of event, and the movements are much greater than anything that could be explained by negative or positive statements on this BB or any other BB. Nor by market sentiment generally. This sort of fluctuation is not without consequence, and the company and/or the regulator should really be trying to get to the bottom of it.

But I very much doubt if anyone will bother.

😄

Correct me if I'm wrong, Notes, but I assume the reason for your question was in case the BoD might not be allowed to issue notice of any price-sensitive events for 30 days following the award of these options. If that was the root of your question, then I think it is safe to say no, it should not prevent them from giving us an RNS with good news!

Notes, I don't know for sure, but I wouldn't have thought so as they are not exercisable immediately, so is not the same as buying or selling on the market.

Yes, telephoneman, and one of them is absolutely convinced that you are wazzza!

I believe they got "struck off", Para.

I just feel sorry for anyone who took fright and sold, and in particular for those who had their stop-losses triggered.

Southerhay, I expect the FCA are too busy counting the chocolate biscuits on the table to be bothered with trivia like manipulated share prices!

Thanks for that Beatquo.

I don't understand why anyone uses stop-losses on AIM. Whatever price you set, no matter how low, the MMs will find it and take it off you.

Fishing for stop-losses, it seems.