Member Info for Piltick

If I lay a ruler on the chart, it says to me bottom out at 8.0.

Huge buys yesterday. Perhaps something is afoot?

Well that's rather odd, BumbleB, because I have just searched for members dolphin and dolphin5 and both are non-existent. Yet his posts are still there. Probably a system glitch, but he is complaining over on the other BB that he has been banned from here.

I think that is hardly a capitulation or indeed a revelation, Anne!

Looks like someone wants to keep the SP steady at around 1.70.

Good heavens, seems they've both completely vanished!

@Kapkina: Capex for the basic unit to produce electricity only, using the syngas and a gas generator, has been estimated at £5M. Although KA did say that the first unit would undoubtedly cost more up to £6M or even £8M but subsequent units would cost less than that. And if more than one unit is installed on one site, then presumably there would be economies of scale so the cost of each unit would be less.

To produce hydrogen at a purity suitable to be used as fuel in electric cars using fuel cells, additional equipment would be required with an additional capital cost of £5M bringing the total up to £10M. Some of the reports and documents that I have seen can be a little bit unclear and need to be studied carefully.

If we get a good RNS on Monday or Tuesday, I will be delighted of course, but then I think questions ought to be put to the Nomad about the rise on Friday.

"It's in the water"?
Of course it's in the water. It's never been out of the water!

Yes please Dave.

Admin: There was an RNS issued by the company on 30th July but is missing from here. Could you please hunt it out?
Thanks

How are they going to produce the hydrogen? Probably using renewable hydroelectric power?

Both!
The rig is still tied up in Dubai.

Yes, actually he has. I was just being cautious!

Yes it is BumbleB. Different rules, perhaps?
Anyway, I think it was a very good response. In my opinion it clears up quite a few questions that keep popping up on this BB and others.
It was posted over there by bobby4. Some seem to think he is a re-incarnation of wazzza, if you believe in that sort of thing!

Actually there wasn't a part 4, but part 3 was removed and I was given a wrap over the knuckles and told that I shouldn't reproduce correspondence from individuals on here when it can't be verified as such. Which I suppose is fair comment.

So presumably someone reported it, or maybe Admin spotted it themselves.

@Newboy: Partly my mistake, I was actually looking at Newboy as a member instead of Newboy58, but nevertheless I'm sure that you have had posts removed from earlier today.

Anyone know what has happened to Newboy? All of his posts disappeared this morning, but he is still registered as a member. I would send him a private message, but I'm not a premium user, so can't.

So not long now, we hope, until we get the result of the independent verification.

@sellonnews: Are you trying to be deliberately misleading? You said:
"An off-the-shelf ceramic reactor chamber containing "exotic materials"... whatever next?"

What DR actually wrote was:
"...we are working with alternative, semi-exotic materials that have proven to be both reliable and effectively impervious to caustic erosion within the temperature envelopes in which we operate."

Spot the difference? He said nothing about off-the-shelf reactor, and he said semi-exotic.

I have no problem with people posting on here with genuine concerns or negative views about the company or the technology or anything else for that matter, but misleading unfounded careless throw-away statements should always be challenged in my view.