Member Info for Phimx

Mrhanji:

If you are using QBT's RNS to promote your investment case then Gardin is still working to obtain 2024 revenue.

It is obvious to sane unblinkered people that an RNS from Gardin cannot be relied upon.

Mrhanji:

It looks to me like a bunch gamblers hoping for another little spike before more disappointment drags the price back down.

I think what Gardin is seeking is a M.O.U or letter of support or intent to add some backbone to this fading project. It is obvious that a project that could supposedly bring huge savings to miners would not lie idle over the summer with hundreds of thousands, if not millions being thrown away needlessly. What business men stroll off on holiday leaving a big money making deal lying on a desk.

He needs something to keep believers on the hook.

The Bitcoin mining industry not in a hurry to save millions in electricity costs using QBT methods.

"it's a no brainer"

"No extra cost"

Pull the other one !

Gentle1619:

Does your research indicate the battery technology to be used ?

Oldsharedog:

You assume too much - incorrectly.

Oldsharedog:

I'm assuming from that verbage, you also have assumed that Gardin wrote the Chaimans statement.

On different topic, I think you and others have misplaced antagonism towards company critics. We, critics and supporters, are all here to make money - to a man. If any ramper could convince me QBT was genuine and about to produce an enormous money making product I would buy in immediately. But until there is some evidence apart from Gardin's non scientific, evasive and eror prone babble, then I'm not buying. So it isn't a us and them battle it's a fight of gain or loss. Its totally pointless playing the man play the evidence and play the market.

Oldsharedog:

Who else but the Chairman would write the Chairman's statement, particularly when Gardin is the only full time person working in this ephemeral company.

If he didn't write it who did ?

Oldsharedog:

I spot your deliberate avoidance of the issue. For all your waffle you have no answer for Gardins flawed maths. That's the what happens when the CEO writes up the RNS without a team to keep him straight.

Sorry I should have said "up to 30%" as stated in last RNS.

So, as Usersteve has stated, that could be anything from 30% down to virtually zero.

It's a 30% energy saving but a 43% increase in hashing rate. Worst of all Gardin continus to use the wrong figure.

Oldsharedog: You post

" Kefalos Coins rejected my bet on the basis that they said that Phimx was a snake tongued fake news type of person, who uses weasel words whilst mumbling bumbling his way through his exciting lifestyle."

The only news I pronounce on is the drivel that Gardin spouts. For example the 30 efficiency gain for Method C.

I throw away 30% of 100 inputs I could hash, so I actually hash 70. So I can hash another 30 inputs but want a minute I can discard 30% of those as losers. Now I've hashed 90, hang about I can process another 10 inputs and throw away 30% of those I.e. 3. Etc etc.

So it works out if I had 143 inputs to process and I throw away 30% I only need to hash 100 but I've processed 43 inputs more than the equivalent hasher without method C

The end result Method C, if throwing away 30% definite losing inputs gives a theoretical improvement of 43% and not 30% as stated many time by mumbling bumbling Gardin.

Ponder that watching fishing boats !

Oldsharedog:

I don't recall saying I won't be posting. You're getting confused again and applying wishful thinking. Perhaps your boring lifestyle tales will keep us occupied until Gardin is able to work up another pivot to this doomed project. My guess, he's trying to wangle an angle from Mr. Bynoe

Oldsharedog:

For you I'll make a special effort, we don't want your ego getting rusty

Predictive text!

A bit like the methods, predicts everything anything but whats required.

I guess there's not much to post about now!

Will will have to await the next mumbling bumbling interview.

WilliwontI: You post

"It was me that said that Phimx, you're lack of attention to detail is proven yet again, I repeat, where does it say no progress!"

I said no progress, obviously suggested by an RNS that reported 𝗡𝗢 𝗣𝗥𝗢𝗚𝗥𝗘𝗦𝗦

Williwont:

See Oldsharedog 08:37

Oldsharedog: You post

"Phimx - how can you say 'no progress made'

First of all you forgot to add to that " since June"

Everything in the latest RNS was previously reported or known. Nothing new has happened in 3 months if not more. No results of discussions, testing or evaluations by third parties (why does he say third parties?)

Naff all, but according to Gardin they could be saving millions per year, they don't appear in any rush. Bear in mind discussions have been in progress with some parties for at least 2 years - according to Gardin! It's not as if QBT appeared from nowhere.

Interim RNS a note for for suckers and nothing more.

So briefly what the interim suggests is

No progress has been made since June. All discussions, testing and evaluations have produced nothing. Method C Oracle logic circuit has been sat in a drawer gathering dust.

Miners aren't interested in what QBT are offering.

Perhaps another "revenue before the end of the year" to come once more!!

Usersteve:

A RNS brimming with answers to investors question !

Or another pile of nothingness.

No mention of after market Chinese boards.

Nothing happening as we've known for months, revenue no nearer. In fact this just shows there are no companies rushing to get a slice of what QBT are offering. Even further we don't know exactly what is being offered, I note Method C is "up to 30% " now, 50% gone for good ?

A post for suckers all day long