Member Info for Phimx

Mickydj:

You seem to be trying to turn a mundane discussion into another conspiracy claim.

Me, I'm waiting until Gardin pays me to buy these fantasy shares!

Mickeydj: You post

"Several of the board's most persistent critics were suddenly discussing trading strategies, short positions, securities lending and when shorts should close."

Mickey, on this board there are, and I'm guessing, perhaps 20 regular posters. Consisting of, yes you've guessed, pro and anti contributors. Why would anyone find it remotely surprising that the majority responding are anti?

I think the responses suggest even the pros have doubts and that doesn't surprise me in the slightest!

Mickydj: You post

" Those who spend years analysing how to profit from a falling share price are apparently just "ordinary investors."

Come come. Who has spent years analysing how to profit from a falling share price ? It is simply the reciprocal of profiting from a rising share price.

Analyse this BUY LOW SELL HIGHER. How many years do you need ?

Mickydj: You post

"I said it demonstrates a remarkable familiarity with trading and short-selling mechanics from posters who spend years talking down the company."

I think you are attributing far too much investment nous to what is really a very simple operation. Shorting is simply the reciprocal of the more normal and easier to implement long trading, buying then selling at a higher price. Anyone trading does a similar thing, sells then hopes to buy back in at a lower price and repeat.... ideally.

True shorting uses rented shares by someone expecting the share price to drop. It's still a sell high buy lowprinciple. Of course the only interesting part is, who loans out the shares ?

I've never been asked to loan my shares but I wonder if my nominee accounts does ?

Inforapennyortwo:

A quick look through my history, looks like one of my first posts was 28 June 2024. So I make that a 2 year push, exactly when does a shorter close a short? Anyone with a short would surely close it now, would they not? Why would a shorter quibble over a few fractions of a pence when according to you the big deal is imminent. Ergo this is the time to close a short and buy up the shares ready for the big rise. But you'll not see any ramping from me !!!

Gardin obviously has a forward plan, although up to now he has chopped and changed in an attempt to keep his story credible. No doubt the next delaying phase will excite you and others to imagine you are about to inherit great wealth. These companies run their course but slowly sink in to oblivion.

Mickydj:

You start with a Sell, but where did those shares come from ?

All share possesion starts with a buy of some form by an investor, perhaps from an initial placing or a regular share trade. Even a shorter gains by obtaining shares selling them then buying back lower and returning them to the original holder. Had the original holder sold and bought back in lower it wouldn't be considered shorting. It's all a matter of timing and who makes the correct decision.

Your problem was you did t sell and now you are in the wrong phase of the investment cycle!

Mickydj: You post

"To illustrate the mechanics, assume a trader holds a short position of 8 million shares.

Recent price swings might look something like this:

Trade 1

Sell at 0.60p

Buy back at 0.43p

Gross trading gain: £13,600

Trade 2

Sell at 0.52p

Buy back at 0.43p

Gross trading gain: £7,200

Trade 3

Sell at 0.50p

Buy back at 0.36p

Gross trading gain: £11,200

Trade 4

Sell at 0.45p

Buy back at 0.38p

Gross trading gain: £5,600

Across those four hypothetical trades, the gross trading gain would be approximately £37,600 on a single 8 million share position."

Wow, so easy why didn't I think of that !

But I'm not sure that is and different to any punters strategy on AIM. You are simply describing

BUY LOW - SELL HIGHER, BUY LOWER- SELL HIGHER etc etc

Mickeydj: You post

" What isn't fair is pretending the subsequent development work—ASIC engagement, source code, engineering support, AI Oracle development and testing—simply didn't exist because it doesn't support your conclusion"

You fail to acknowledge the entire principle of an MDK. It provides miners with an open source system to allow development of a bespoke miner. Engagement and support is part of the deal for everyone buying into the MDK.

I doubt QBT is getting anything more than any other MDK developer. Gardin's puffed up PRNs make it appear so.

Mickydj: You post

" One does not magically appear without the other."

I beg to differ. It would appear the Gardin's statement of revenue in 2024 was based on nothing else but magic.

Pure fantasy by Gardin and judging by all his other fantasy and failure one could presume the same will happen to all his current claims. Once a dreamer always a dreamer

"immediate release and sale"

Just more of Gardin's wishful thinking. It fills out a PRN and impresses the suckers

Mickydj:

Why don't you comment on the 10% efficiency claim made by Gardin, I think readers would be interested to know if I'm talking rubbish or not !

I'm not the slightest bit interested in the price of Bitcoin, it has no relevance to QBT

As of now no-one here has any idea what gain Method C software brings to the table. The only thing stated by Gardin, as far as I know, is the claim that something can mine at 10% faster than the pool minimum I.e.

" Over the past month, testing of the new software-only version in the Company's Milan laboratory has shown an average improvement in mining efficiency of over 10% - meaning, its capability of finding the winning hash at over 10% above the minimal difficulty threshold as set by most mining pools. "

For all the bluster and waffle from Gardin and all the Bullions of bits of data generated during testing, we are all clueless!!

Mickydj:

What rubbish you post, the great conspiracy eh! But the conspiracy is QBt's not mine

Mickydj: You post

" Suggest that the original post is false and misleading and then the narrative again reinforced by Phimx as always"

Rubbish, I've replied to a post about the final Results nothing to do with the price of Bitcoin whatsoever.

Your pants must be on fire once again.

Final Results will be for year ending 31 December 2025! Don't expect comprehensive and detailed information from the master of mumble and jumble.

Keep the punters in the dark so they can't find flaws in the story!

Inforapennyortwo: You post

"As for only news moves the share price, that’s not true, buying or selling pressure does also, you see it on every company."

And what triggers buying or selling pressure ??

Unless a few reasonable contracts are announced soon it's going to drift lower. I'm out once again, not what I was expecting.

RNS 12 November 2025

"Francesco Gardin, CEO and Executive Chairman of QBT, commented , "The last six months have been crucial for this major R&D achievement which has involved, among other things, the generation of a staggering amount of mining data for the training of the new AI model. "

They must be drowning in data !

Previously they had so much it broke their Peta machine.

Gardin, perhaps you could report another breakdown and string this out even longer. No no, how about the company was hacked and all the data was stolen and you have to start again!

Obelix: You post

" Also, YOU NEVER invested, why are you worried?"

Me worried !

You, on the other hand, must be a nervous wreck!

RNS 5 December 2025

"The process has reached the stage where these three companies will now be needing to make their mining rigs available to QBT's testing team at its laboratory in Milan, with access to their relevant source code.

Something that presented no difficulty has now taken 7 months

String it out, no deals this year !