Member Info for Phimx

MrHanji: You post

" Does Method C work on a real third-party ASIC rig?

If yes, then the 6 March RNS already told us what comes next"

Since Mothod C was supposedly independent of the ASICs, then obviously there is no reason why it should not. You do not seem to grasp even the simplest concepts put forward by Gardin.

Method C, for your education has nothing to do with the workings of any ASIC. According to Gardin, it is a filter inserted between the incoming data supplied by the pool and the data ouput sent to an ASIC. Since they are running QBTs own system on a server and not the mining rig there should be no problem there !!!

Llewlyn: You post

" It’s basically the cartel of bashers who have made a lot of money with their tactics trying to control the price."

Hahaa hahaha hahaahhhaaaaa

Same fantasy world as Gardin !

Llewlyn:

I think last time I asked you to verify your false accusations you ran away and hid for a couple of weeks. Please try and man up this time. Let hs all know when the options were exercised at 5p or 10p ?? I suspect at those prices no-one is in any rush to buy QBT shares at that price.

Come llewlyn spill the beans, you're plenty good at calling people liars but you don't seem to have the spine or information to back up your the false accusations you make.

Llewlyn: You post

" Not true again Phimx - my my you stay things as fact when you've not a clue, I think that's very misleading, report yourself to admin as you like getting posts deleted 😂, well, the one's that continually prove your agenda here is one of disruption and being very economical with the truth.."

Care to tell us how many options have been exercised and when ? That should be quite easy for you since it would have been subject to an RNS, since the number of shares would increase.

Happy to be educated by you !

What options mean!

Anyone paid in options by QBT has received nothing in years !!

Inforapennyortwo: You post

" if a trade was entered incorrectly (e.g.,wrong price or quantity), the broker may reverse the original trade and re-book it correctly"

I wonder why it seems to only happen to the big trades ??

Obelix: You post

" I read your posts today and earlier you said, test results, in this case, would also have a very significant influence."

I did not 𝘀𝗮𝘆 that but I did 𝘄𝗿𝗶𝘁𝗲 something similar i.e.

"A deal 𝗶𝗳 made would have a significant affect on share price”

What a pathetic attempt to try and attribute to me falsehoods. If you can't copy and paste accurately don't bother.

I've have researched the CV of people working in the Optlab in the Computef Science Department but could find no collaborations with QBT. In fact none of them appeared to be involved in the type of research being alleged undertaking by QBT.

Usersteve:

The price is being held at not less than 0.35p to allow those remaining placing shares to be siphoned off to the PIs. It also hints at no further news from QBT to try and lift the share price any time soon, otherwise the holder would be slightly more reluctant to get rid of at 0.35p.

Haha

LIWELYN beat him to it

Usersteve:

Unfortunately we've both used highlighted text ! Mickydj will fly into a conspiracy frenzy claiming we are the same ID.

Inforapennyortwo:

I posted

" A deal if made would have a significant affect on share price”

That great big word again !

𝗜𝗳 𝗶𝗳 𝗶𝗳

Koolkat: You post

" What I am saying is that the third-party testing is real, the NDA with the ASIC manufacturer is real, and the conference meeting was real."

What's real is what Gardin has stated. Whether or not NDAs exist is open to question. I believe Gardin did not attend NEMS2026, he produced no photos also why keep attending these shows, they appear to produce nothing but endless discussions. Discussions can take place at any time, why waste flying to and fro to the states. Gardin doesn't makes any presentations of his breakthroughs or pump the company. Bynoe or Rios hide their QBT associations very well, presumably they aren't being paid to pump QBT.

Koolkat: You post

" ... and my due diligence points that way"

How can you say that in all seriousness? Due diligence !

By that I assume you have examined every statement Gardin has ever stated or written. A sensible and normal person can see it has been a litany of promises and false expectations. These failures are blatantly obvious but you have decided to ignore them and put all your faith in what Gardin claims, rather you than me.

Hexam: You post

" There are strong opinions on both sides of that argument but nobody knows for sure."

What we do know with certainty is there are NO deals. Apart from Gardin claiming NDAs with anonymous ASIC makers there are no contracts, MoU, JV or legal obligations whatsoever. A truly pathetic response for claimed Bitcoin mining breakthroughs which could, it's also claimed save companies millions in energy alone.

!!!

Koolkat: You post

" Deals don’t need to be announced the second they exist, and test outcomes don’t need to be broadcast the moment they’re produced, especially when NDAs are in play."

I'm afraid you are wrong. A deal if made would have a significant affect on share price, therefore to prevent insider trading it should be announced as soon as possible.

Tests results, in this case, would also have a very significant influence also.

This is a well known rule of disclosure, at least to some !!

Sellonthespikes: You post

" So why so vocal all of a sudden? He’s traded back in after heavy losses before, fair enough, but why not just sit back and let FG deliver if the conviction is so strong? Instead it’s constant jabbing, emojis and trying to shut down anyone questioning the credibility of this lifestyle share."

This is an excellent example of simple stupidity. Buying into QBT was probably an exciting decision with too little research but luckily he learned of his folly and exited with the family savings just intact. We can forgive that first blunder. Sadly he has made a very silly decision and has now gone back in and paid out far too much, somehow expecting Gardin to come up trumps again. That's the family silver almost gone. Now he's praying for the miracle which won't appear and will lose him the lot. Perhaps he's thinking to remortgage the house, buying more to average down, heaven forbid.

The scent of desperation lingers over the Koolkat household. Perhaps he's been so busy trying to prop up Gardin's fantasy he hasn't noticed its all quiet once again!

Koolkat: You post

" ... and spend the energy on something that doesn’t require years of emotional surveillance"

Perhaps you should heed you own advice, after all it is you with the three kids.

Hexam:

Mining a Bitcoin with a single miner, as I have pointed out recently, will take decades for a mediocre 100 TH/s miner.

For actual live mining there are two main considerations, joining a pool and testing the system inter-operates with the pool and that the Oracle does what is supposed to do.

Connecting and communicating with the pool should be routine! So how does the Oracle prove it's worth, it won't be finding a Bitcoin hash ! So it has to be mining share hashes I.e. producing more shares than its reference machine. That should be proved in a matter of hours since they are produced on the minutes time scale and prove your hashing rate.

What could be problematic is having two machines operating under identical input conditions operating as pool machines.

Koolkat: you post

" This confidence is not coming from nowhere either, it is backed by two years of internal simulator work and tens of thousands of live tests on QBT’s own rigs"

And not a single sensible or substantial statement of what the testing produced !!!

How many Bitcoins mined ?

More importantly, how many measurable share hashes produced versus some sensible reference??

What advantage is QBT offering the Bitcoin industry ??

Sorry can't say because of the NDA ??