Member Info for Phimx

Oldsharedog:

Sorry but 1knocker has posted on ADVFN, looks like your claim is wrong and everything he posted has substance.

Oldsharedog: You post

" It is clear from the ongoing theme of rhetoric, that he shows signs of repeated fantasist imaginary delusion. This is born out by ways of impossible realisation of hopeful acceptance, usually triggered by delusional expectation."

I like my English simple and without intrigue. The above is gibberish. Allforprofit needs to post on ADVFN an unambiguous message to Oldsharedog, then the rest of us don't have to read all this drivel!

Allforprofit:

Why not simply post a greeting to Oldsharedog on ADVFN using the 1knocker account?

Allforprofit:

In general I'm not one for recommending shares to others it's never easy. Given that you have a fair bit of nous do some research of IES. They have a real product and the time for big battery storage appears to be finally taking off. Beware, I have made several mistakes in my stock picking career- QBT will not be one of them though.

Gentle:

Strangely the energy density has decreased from 104 MWh/Acre to 96, although the energy appears to have risen and the battery module dimensions remain the same.

Koolkat: You post

" I can't ever see QBT mining Bitcoin. LMFAO"

But Gardin did make a poor attempt with Miner One, so he does have previous. Just imagine how long he could string that out for.

£20,000 a month or so is a good incentive.

Awl007:

You just can't tell em like Gardin can

Awl007:

If there were any profits I think that would qualify for a RNS.

I was suggestion a way Gardin could take this story given deals are improbable. Any deal that may be announced would need to name a big player and not an anonymous non-entity.

Perhaps the old boy is still on his summer holiday and reluctant to return to London.

At 71 the old boy needs to get a move on !

Gardin's silence could be an indicator that he is busy hatching a move to QBT mining Bitcoin. Buying or renting rigs and then using methods A and B to provide the statistical edge, assuming it actually exists! In the background is the mythical Method C waiting to crack mining wide open, Gardin suggests.

Why license when you can rule the world !!

Oldsharedog:

You are on a roll this morning, I was forced to smile at that one

Mickeydj: You post

" For real insights, stick to QBT's RNS updates or Proactive interviews for grounded developments."

Wow that's exactly what the sceptics have promoted for several years. Those statements based upon RNS and Gardin interviews you reported as false and misleading. At the same time you were happy to let rampers spew out there wild fantasies.

I can envisage Gardin pivoting to data mining using his fantastical AI Oracles, this rumour and the creation of Blockeeper could add another chapter to the story

Mickeydj:

Please note the post below is not negative !

From AI

"Que River Mine acquisition: In 2022, Tasmania Data Infrastructure (TDI), a company with links to QBT, acquired the disused Que River Mine to convert it into a Bitcoin mining facility. The site was chosen for its access to the nearby TasNetworks Que substation"

Further investigation needed I think !

Oldsharedog: You post

" I think he has actually been very successful in the laundry business"

Quite good, a sensible comment at long last.

Plutug:

I think you've missed off Medical Equipment sales and restaurants. The man has tried very hard to get rich but then again we are all trying.

Mickeydj: You post

" Phimx your insistence on immediate attention is somewhat petulant, and is of no importance to me."

I think your position is narrow minded. It is important if you wish to get your viewpoint across to others and add credibility to what you write. Without substance you're simply spouting meaningless words. Your continued failure to point out supposed lies and misleading infomation made by sceptics makes it difficult to take anything you write seriously.

I'm surprised you've not accused OSD of the same, presumably you credit him with telling the truth? Perhaps it aligns with your actual experiences of emailing the company!

Mickeydj: You posted

" You don't get to make demands on me Phimx"

But I did !

How do you expect people to take your posts seriously if you never back them up with substance.

The chances of receiving information not in the public domain should be highly improbable, therefore asking questions of the company is a waste of time and effort in the majority of cases. An acknowledgement would be considerate and respectful though.

Did they reply

"We acknowledge receipt of your email"