Member Info for Phimx

Oldshedog:

You want me to stop the truth and facts ?

RNS 23 May 2022 Gardin says

"The second knowledge-based mining approach (Method ‘B’) 𝘄𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗻𝗲𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗮𝘃𝗮𝗶𝗹𝗮𝗯𝗶𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗼𝗳 𝗮 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗽𝗿𝗶𝗲𝘁𝗮𝗿𝘆 𝗔𝗦𝗜𝗖 𝗰𝗵𝗶𝗽, if successful, probabilistic mining could be improved by several factors compared to today’s deterministic BTC mining using commercial ASIC chips."

RNS 13 Nov 2024: Gardin says

"Method C differs from previously reported QBT’s Methods A and Method B in that the former needs to be directly implemented onto the ASIC chip at the manufacturing stage, 𝘄𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘀 𝗠𝗲𝘁𝗵𝗼𝗱𝘀 𝗔 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗕 𝗰𝗮𝗻 𝗯𝗲 𝘀𝘂𝗽𝗽𝗹𝗶𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗼 𝗮𝗹𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗱𝘆 𝗲𝘅𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗮𝘀 𝗮 𝗦𝗮𝗮𝗦 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗱𝘂𝗰𝘁

What's it to be Gardin ?

Oldsharedog:

It appears Mickeydj is making up the story. The information I posted can be found on the Web by goggling SEAL 04 latest news. Mickeydj has latched onto the reported delay of The second SEAL 04 development. It is not next gen design, as stated by Mickeydj, it is a two pronged approach by Bitdeer to produce their SEAL 04 development, trying to achieve a very high efficiency of around 5 J/TH.

Obviously Bitdeers developments should be of interest to QBT's investors

Usersteve: You posted

"Phimx said "...the next-generation Seal 04 is significantly delayed."

Slight correction, I didn't say that Bitdeer reported it.

The tape-out for the first Seal 04 design was completed in September, and latest sample verification demonstrated approximately 6-7 joules per terahash power efficiency at the chip level under low-voltage ultra-power-saving mode. We are targeting mass production to begin in Q1 2026. In the meanwhile, development of the next-generation Seal 04 is significantly delayed.

Maidit: You post

" I truly believe there is a massive BLUE say coming here nothing can stop it after 5 years of R&D"

You said the same things about In-spirit Energy, it spent about 10 years of R&D. They said many times their technology had "boundless potential" but it all turned out to be worthless. A non- commercial project with no teams of people just great RN filled with vague empty words . They took millions from the British public with absolutely nothing to show for it.

Deal after the first snowfall ?

Mickeydj:

A typo is a mistake, pressing the wrong by accident. Addressing you as Mickeydj was no typo.

Mickeydj:

And anyone else bored out of their skull! Fkr example look at page 3 of my posting history, there are 7 posts all addressed to 𝗠𝗶𝗰𝗸𝗲𝘆𝗱𝗷

Without a shadow of doubt no typo !!

Mickydj: You post

" And the 'Mickeydj' typo is exactly one of those same typographical quirks"

Mickey so sorry to have to correct you once again but if one looks back over my many replies to you it is plainly obvious that it is no typo. I have been calling you 𝗠𝗶𝗰𝗸𝗲𝘆𝗱𝗷 from almost the day you first reported me.

Surely you can do a little research before making these incorrect posts!

Mickeydj:

Oh no !

Avocet123 is Plutuq and 𝗣𝗵𝗶𝗺𝘅

Also please note, there are only 2 posters using 𝗵𝗶𝗴𝗵𝗹𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁𝗲𝗱 text on this board, myself and Usersteve. Perhaps we are all the same person. No others seem to have found the right LSE button to press.

Mickeydj: You post

" Third, they target the same individuals (mikeydj, OSD, Baserite, Jambones) with synchronized hostility and identical insults"

You use the words " ... hostility and identical insults" ery emotive words but I think anyone reading my posts would find it difficult to identify them as hostile and insulting.

I rarely insult people but of course your definition of an insult is somewhat more expansive than mine. I have written previously that I try not to lower my standards and reply to other posters with common insults. I think you will find it extremely difficult to find a post of mine which includes swear words or even disguised swear words. Please feel free to post where I have written vulgar words or phrases.

I think you have fabricated your post which,as usual, attacks the poster and not what he posts. I can only assume because you are afraid of what is written and not who wrote it. You can't dispute or argue against what's written therefore you attack and try and discredit the writter.

I assume you have reported Plutuq and myself as having the same identity to the moderators, if not please do. I doubt the moderators will agree with your assessment.

Mickeydj:

Fascinating read but unfortunately the conclusion is incorrect. Yes I have discussed 5 nm ASICs in posts, if anyone cares to Google "Phimx + 5 nm" you will find several results. Alas a Google for " Phimx + charlatan " will produce zero results as will "Phimx + piggy bank" I don't recollect using charlatan or piggy bank in any of my thousands of posts. The same for the word doomed, not a word I would normally use.

Of course "jam tomorrow" is a well used phrase on virtually all of LSE boards and I'm sure I've used that phrase several times. As for "world class teams" you have that wrong also, I would describe the quote marks as sarcastic rather than ironic. As for the "£20,000" I use that as a rough figure for Gardin's takings, I'm not sure I've ever seen Plutuq ever use that in his writings.

Your post is a masterclass in disinformation, how desperate you are becoming to discredit honest posters on this board. Thankfully it changes not one iota of QBT's pathway to nowhere, which rests totally in Gardin's careless hands

Usersteve:

North of 10% and with what unknown provisos ? No sensible specifications whatsoever. The extraordinary claim that Methods can work with any ASIC! Since the inner workings are proprietary and not public knowledge how do they manage that. They couldn't reverse engineering CGminer with documented code. The problem is knowing how the ASICs work and actually being able to modify the hash sequences. Of course this ignores the requirements of the pool as it distributes the work.

Mickeydj: You posted

" QBT has been focusing on commercializing its innovations amid a volatile small-cap market. As of November 4, 2025, the company remains in a development phase previously disclosed by its directors."

Alternately 𝗻𝗼 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗴𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘀

Icemanzag:

Of course not. Gardin has demonstrated, as many AIM companies have, that issuing negative news is not an important priority. He has not updated investors on the rejection of the ASICBoost patent. He did not tell investors that revenue in 2024 would not be achieved. He has not told investors what methods A and B can achieve on CGMiner rigs. He has not told investors of the results of testing by other parties. He did not tell investors that a 5 nm ASIC was simply wishful thinking on his behalf. He has not told investors how the SaaS trials went with customers.

Gardin says as little as possible, I believe, because he's afraid of making errors in his story. That £20,000 a month is a real carrot!

Drutor:

Excellent ..... clap clap clap

Mickeydj: You post

" A raise is NOT inevitable ..."

Since there is insignificant income but significant outcome, a raise is absolutely necessary otherwise the company will eventually have no money to continue paying Gardin's bloated wages. Obviously 20 world class experts working hard will need to feed their families, options have no appreciable calories. Remind me how long these experts have been working hard for free !

Mickeydj:

Why not save the intrigue and just tell what is the real reason. Obviously no-one could possibly be disgruntled with this world class company.

RNS 20 September 2023: 2 years ago Gardin said this

" the Company has been faced with a very challenging software engineering project. Nonetheless, through the partial redesign of Method B, the Company can start porting on the equipment made by the largest mining rig manufacturer in that region. The Company’s R&D Machine Learning team has been able to quickly modify Method B while retaining the entirety of its performance enhancements, as confirmed through internal testing undertaken by the R&D team. QBT expects that this encouraging result will (once the porting of Method B on the mining rig firmware has been completed), allow the Company to pursue commercial arrangements for the deployment of QBT’s methods in the mining hardware market segment.

But we have since found out that the 7 professors could not reengineer CGMiner to allow access to the ASICs. If they didn't understand how CGMiner communicated and controlled the ASIC how on earth could they modify Method B and retain in entirety its performance ? We know Gardin attempted to get a driver from -CK but was told to go away. So he switched to ESP where the mysteries of the ASICs had been resolved, again not by his 'team' of professors, if they exist!

I get the impression Gardin was naive and thought he could achieve results with a very small team of inexperienced people working on the cheap. Essentially he is a businessman and although his early career was in AI his knowledge of computing, software and the Bitcoin industry was outdated and not up to the job. This showed up in his statements regarding production of a leading edge ASIC - he was clueless initially. Worse than clueless since he didn't appear to seek advice from his world class team of 'experts'

I suspect Gardin writes these RNS himself and didn't get them fact checked by his ASIC expert?