Member Info for Phimx

Llewelyn: You post

" ... but no reason not to be confident here"

So the lack of a deal after 2 years or so talking to the players is of no concern ? The lack of a deal after 3 months of ' negotiations ' is of no concern?

Bitdeers upcoming game changing SEAL04 doesn't give you any cause for concern ?

Michael Fish welcome to the board !

If Bitdeer's new SEAL04 works as predicted I.e. gives a 47% efficiency increase from 9.5J/TH to 5 J/TH then QBT's Methods aren't going to allow other ASICs to catchup. Method C at 30% won't help and I suspect Method B at 160% gain is more dream than reality. I think Bitdeer is a reality in the making whereas QBT methods is an old man's wishful thinking.

Mrhanji: You posted

" June 19th - Negotiations with 2 aftermarket board makers - no RNS means those negotiations haven't collapsed at all."

September 19th: I guess the aftermarket board makers are not in any great rush to save themselves 𝗠𝗜𝗟𝗟𝗜𝗢𝗡𝗦

What is a few 𝗠𝗜𝗟𝗟𝗜𝗢𝗡𝗦 compared to the fun of negotiating with Foggy for months on end.

Mrhanji: You post

"Trolls have gone a little silent here.. I guess its sinking in they were wrong.. Again.."

Gardin saves us a lot of effort, his ability to bring down the share price is legend.

When we're we wrong ? Have QBT sold something and made some revenue, that RNS has slipped by me!

Allforprofit: You post

" History tells us that it is likely we shall never hear any more about this year's alleged demonstrations and expected commercial contracts. The whole episode will be quietly forgotten, as though it had never happened. Perhaps it did not happen."

I think what history tells us is these AIM companies can keep the plates spinning for a long long time, switching from one project to another.

UKOG is a great example, they've raised hundreds of millions from the British public and produced nothing of substance.

Usersteve:

Perfectly OK.

Usersteve: You post

"Possibly another long-term holder that has run out of patience and abandoned ship."

Obviously you did not read my post on this trade yesterday.

Wake Wakey today is the big day !

Vanilla waffle wrapped in a beige RNS

This was reported.

"In one example, for Method A, this was accomplished by running two identical ASIC miners, in real-time mining mode, with the same clock frequency and thermal conditions; one mining with its native GCminer operating system and one with a modified CGminer, which included QBT AI software. The results clearly showed that using QBT AI software resulted in producing more pool rewards per unit of time.

Hahaha 2 miners in a pool, how big was the pool?

Were the 2 miners running Method A in reduced performance mode?

What was the efficiency gain using Method A?

Why use Method A when Method B does the same thing so much more efficiently?

Why operate in a pool, don't Methods A and B conflict with pooling allocations?

What are the total rewards of QBT's live mining ?

What miners were used?

What ASICs were used?

What was QBT's percentage of the pool's hash rate?

Etc ...

Mickeydj: You post

" Wont be long Phimx, enjoy it while it lasts"

Undoubtedly!

For anyone that may be interested, the 2,855,857 trade today was bought on the 9 Sep 2025 for 19.9 k.

The lucky trader made about £500 risking his £20,000. Each to his own !

Come to think of it where is Mickeydj, has he deserted this floundering project?

Oldsharedog: You post

" Phimx - absolutely desperate : ) can't you tell by the tone & don't try and backtrack or disguise the use of wording - just admit the attempt at falsifying someone's genuine post with obscure inaccuracies."

Actual OSD I don't have a clue what you are attempting to suggest.

Where did I attempt to falsify someone's genuine post and with what obscure inaccuracies?

Oldsharedog:

I think youve embellished my post of 8 August 11:50, it was

" You may spend some time looking apparently you're in the wrong place for Marlin"

Notice the use of the word'apparently" I took my lead from the Internet which suggested your locality was not best for Marlin fishing.

Obviously you are desperate to score a few points with these irrelevant postings.

Pipster: You post

" The only real risk would be if the data isn’t accurate and the figures being shared aren’t genuine — but that would be a very elaborate story to maintain"

What are the figures ?

From the June2025 interview he did not state what Method A produced. He said " say you have 3% ..." and for Method B he said "north of 10%"

So no one can be sure exactly what gains are provided with the methods modified to work with most ASICs, a tall order indeed. How on earth can that be said when the big miners don't release the inner workings of their ASICs.

Pipster: You post

" We’re now almost two months since the last update, so surely the next piece of news has to be something material — either a contract or some solid proof of results"

Your math not good!

It's quiet here today.

I'm surprised the rampers haven't latched on to the SEAL 4 ASIC development.

"The two different designs are being developed simultaneously to increase the likelihood of a successful outcome. This strategy diversifies development risk and allows for different architectural approaches to reach the target performance and efficiency goals."

Does one of those variations include Method C to enable the efficiency to be achieved ???? Bitdeer seem to meet the company profile suggested/hinted at by Foggy.

Usersteve:

Not your run of the mill private investor, more placing shares being dumped before the announcement?

Oldsharedog: You post

"2 hrs and counting ( it’s actually 1hr 52mins) before that is corrected"

Remind me!