Member Info for Phimx

Oldsharedog: You post

"If an RNS lands there will be cash flying in from all directions"

Dreamer!

Gardin trying to find something to keep this gig earning money for himself

Maidit:

The only evidence for the supporters of QBT is what Garding writes in RNS and his virtually indecipherable babbling interviews.

But as everyone knows here, critics and supporters alike, Gardin's word is not his bond. He has pivoted the storyline several times and his proclamations have just not held water.

Believe him or apply common sense. I guarantee nobody but Gafdin is going to make their fortune here.

Corrected to include "not"

**********************************

Maidit: You post

" For the ASIC chip manufactures to catch up w3ith what FG and team has achieved would take many years ..."

But what exactly has he achieved ? The reality is not one of us knows!!

Gardin has not stated specifically what performance is being achieved, under what conditions and compared to what reference.

Does that not remind you of the tactic used at In-spirit. They claimed x amount of kW came out of their technology but not once indicated whether it was thermal or electrical and just as important what was going in !

Gardin waffled on about Method A in his last interview, why? Who gives a toss about Method A when it is supposedly beaten hands down by Method B. Both supposedly reducing the search space, why the the lack of detail and clarity, what is he trying to hide from investors?

Maidit: You post

" For the ASIC chip manufactures to catch up w3ith what FG and team has achieved would take many years ..."

But what exactly has he achieved ? The reality is not one of us knows!!

Gardin has stated specifically what performance is being achieved, under what conditions and compared to what reference.

Does that not remind you of the tactic used at In-spirit. They claimed x amount of kW came out of their technology but not once indicated whether it was thermal or electrical and just as important what was going in !

Gardin waffled on about Method A in his last interview, why? Who gives a toss about Method A when it is supposedly beaten hands down by Method B. Both supposedly reducing the search space, why the the lack of detail and clarity, what is he trying to hide from investors?

Awl007:

I think it's far better dreaming and not being a fool

Maidit: You post

"... otherwise FG would not have said aiming for first revenue end of summer"

But you ignore he alsm said revenue before the end of 2024!

Where was that revenue supposed to be coming from ? Gardin says many things but he doesn't back it with substance.

You seem also to have forgotten everything that was said by John Gunn at In-spirit. That was all pie in the sky and I warned you but you just don't seem to recognise reality and you opted for the dream instead.

When your money is all gone there is only yourself to blame.

I can see Gardin approaching BMW to inject some kind of credibility into his rather vague route to riches. Oops apologies, he already has a route, it's shareholders and the company that don't.

Discussions with Bynoes could be another stretched out few months of nothingness.

86KB: You post

" That volume yesterday was not normal and clearly something going on. We will find out soon enough just need patience."

Correct, clearly a bunch of dreamers following the herd thinking "something going on "

How much patience ? Gardin been in discussion for years!

Usersteve: You post

" I wonder if that means Bynoe has stopped working for QBT."

He never started as a salaried employee. He was there for the photo shoots along with Rios.

Cornish78:

Obviously Bynoe's photoshoot role with QBT didn't pay enough !

𝗟𝗹𝗲𝘄𝗲𝗹𝘆𝗻 𝗪𝗛𝗘𝗥𝗘 𝗔𝗥𝗘 𝗬𝗢𝗨 ?

Llewelyn:

Come on boy, print the transcript at 3:48 what does it say ?

Don't hide, you wrote I was posting false and misleading words.

𝗣𝗥𝗢𝗩𝗘 𝗜𝗧

Llwelyn:

Prove it, print the section of the transcript !

Oh look you'll all be millionaires next week, better fill your boots. The rocket is leaving the train station guided by its ears.

Woe is me, I'll still be poor !

SophisticatedD

From my post 8 Sept 18:18

" Also note he does not explicitly say Method A gives 3% he says " ... let's say you improve your hashing power by three precent..."

Don't put Words into Gardin's mouth, they're garbled enough!

SophisticatedD: You posted

" While waiting for the new ASICs, we generalised the method. Currently, it offers a 3% increase in hashing power, small, but with no additional energy use."

This is false information, Gardin did not say that!

Usersteve:

Agree, once phrase lije that appear you just know he doesn't or cannot say something like "our AI was able to demonstrate a minimum x% hashing gain using a xyz system"

The performance could have been miniscule. When no detail is given then you know they have nothing to brag about and are probably hiding non- commercial performance.

Usersteve: from same RNS

" the Company demonstrated compelling evidenc ..."

What became of " irrefutable evidence" isn't irrefutable better than compelling?

Aklee:

" The Company is finally entering into the on-site third-party assessment phase with potential customers and partners. "

First party = QBT

Second party. = customer/partner

Third party. = ????

Zolander:

Bit too poetic for my style !