RE: Large car/marine engine manufacturer28 Sep 2020 11:23
Oldblue: Why does CH, a substantial shareholder, also doubt the product, the progress and the capabilities of Inspirit ??? He must also be a de-ramper according to your criteria . You talk of logical progression, that would be the progression from 1980 to ? Jumping into other applications before you actually have a proven first application - very logical !
Apart from a couple of employees shown in a video, one being Paul Booker, what evidence do you have that employees exist The evidence says they are no employees being paid, at least not from the accounts. There is evidence that senior staff mentioned in RNS on arrival have left the company i.e. marketing. Where are the staff for the big launch, that should have been underway NOW.
Deceit, now that's a very tricky thing. If I say my design and test facility is located in Poland, but it is actually a large wooden hut am I being deceitful ? As long as I've designed and tested my new flower pots in it, then I can happily claim it to be a design and test facility. Or could it also be claimed to be a garden shed ?
If I claim to be working for design for manufacture, what do I have to do to give credibility to that statement - short answer practically nothing. Personal interpretation of statements is more down to ones hopes and aspirations or maybe cynicism than the reality. Of course if a company is proud of their achievements then they may want to showcase them, particularly if you want to justify where shareholders money went and to give confidence in the project/product etc etc etc.
Aim is littered with grand statements, obscure statements, vague statements, truthful statements and downright lying statements. As for the FCA and others - all part of the big investor con.