Member Info for Phimx

Oldblue: You seem quite proud of John Gunn's machinations. Why doesn't he simply tell his shareholders when the Charger will begin sales ??? So simple and guaranteed to win over investors doubts. After all it was supposed to launch this year, or maybe just maybe it will never go on sale. Is seems other priorities have superseded the launch. What on earth could be more important than the launch that you and others have waited years for ? The dream was built on the charger !

Hmmm John Gunn desperate to keep shareholders out of the boardroom, out of the loop and out of the money !

Yes that would really be something, considering the launch date has disappeared from their web site.
It was 2020 then it became 2021 but now, I guess, it's never !!!!

What is the holdup ?

WHERE IS THE CHARGER ? - WHERE IS THE CHARGER ? - WHERE IS THE CHARGER ?

There has been some really ridiculous words written in the last couple of days by some incredibly stupid people.

Of course this is how the AIM Market works, write a RNS with words like maybe, possible, future, in discussions, potential, millions, projected cash flow ….blah blah blah …etc and the fools then start making up wild scenarios hoping to boost the price. The original RNS contains no lies but implies possibilities and grand things. This can be seen in the Letter of Support RNS. Simply read what it says and ask the question why does it not say ……

The stupid people writing that CH is an imposter, well that’s easily sorted.

If not CH himself who has actually bought the 270,000,000 shares.

Are the several RNS relating to the shares held by CH fakes?

Is London really there ?

If CH is an imposter, who called the meeting?

I suppose some of you will say there is going to be no meeting – you could be right on that point, I doubt if John Gunn wants it and I’m guessing it will only deal with the motions raised and no other issues whatsoever. That means he’ll answer no difficult questions, like when will the Charger go on sale John ?

John Gunn where is the evidence - show us the money boy

Before anyone puts any money into this company let's have some evidence - it's very simple to achieve and won't cost anything - why won't he do it ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

Oldblue: A placing without sales simply loses you money.

Evidence Evidence Evidence

Lets see the Charger tested by an independent, lets us see real results

Maidit: If John Gunn wishes to protect the inner workings of his Stirling engine then he needs to patent the thing. To my knowledge the only existing patents do not relate to the engine and those patents will expire soon.

Oldblue: Another conspiracy theory eh. So let’s cut to the chase. On Monday jump in your car and go and ask John Gunn if you can be shown evidence of the following:

RNS 30 March 20: We are working on a large standalone unit which will produce 300 kW

RNS 26 April 19: Schematics for multiple applications created for Marine, Solar, Insp Cooler, Insp Motor/Generator.

RNS Dec19: Currently setting up an Automotive Division.

Ask to see “The Team” working in the Automotive Division
Ask to see the schematics that were created for those projects
Ask to see the work so far completed on the standalone 300 kW unit.

Ask to see the documents/ drawings/specifications created for CE marking and Gas Safe approval. Also ask to see the drawings/schedules and information required for EMC testing of the electrics. In fact ask to see the electronic control system and the power output systems.

John Gunn should welcome you with open arms, you will then be able to return to this board and tell other shareholders and thus ensure John Gunn retains control of his company. You’ll be safe in the knowledge you have invested in a worthwhile company and your money is safe.

It is absolutely straightforward. If John Gunn cannot show you these things he has stated then you’ve been ripped off - bigtime

It matters little what CH intentions are, what has been proved beyond doubt is JG has not delivered and has ignored the Inspirit shareholder. What is there to lose at this stage by voting in CH ?

You have to have a sneaky admiration for Oldblues zealot like faith. Even when faced with years of RNS statements that have proved to be worthless words, failed promises and sheer contempt for shareholders. To me it suggests OB has tied up too much money in this share and cannot accept a failed outcome, he will hang on to the bitter end and watch his money fade away. What evidence does he use to support his faith? Here we are close to the end of 2020, this was the year the Charger was to launch and what of it ? Another failed deadline, how many RNS can the faithful ignore before it becomes clear the Charger isn't going to make them millions. How can he overlook JGs attitude to shareholders, time and time again. There are never any sensible replies just the words deramper and shorter even though shorts do not exist.

The Charger will vanish, replaced by new projects to spin the plates a little more

"one small question in the whole year or so off trying dealing with JG/inspirit they never ever showed you how the tech works you did absolutly no DD? at all i quite frankly dont belive that at all..."

Explain how, when Inspirit are being uncooperative and obstructive, CH was supposed to view the tech.

I think it's been made clear, to everyone but you, he is trying to determine if there is any "tech" worth having because INSP aren't telling ANYONE

It should be obvious to all by now that INSP have been spinning the plates

crh: From your previous messages, you seem to slightly misunderstand the Inspirit ‘tech’. The Charger doesn’t use waste heat recovery, forget those words and that notion. They burn 20 kW of gas to produce electricity and the waste product is hot water. You previous words on efficiency seem at odds with this concept. This was the plan from day one back in the 80s. What you call Inspirits waste heat recovery ‘tech’ could be represented by the heat exchanger designed to work with the boiler to apply the heat to the Stirling engine. Now the big question, is the heat exchanger intrinsic to the boiler, if it is then you can’t throw away the boiler because all that’s left is a Stirling engine without a heat source. I said in a previous message, interfaces are the tricky part, for each and every application you will have to design a new interface to apply the heat to the engine. I suspect you could throw away a lot of efficiency by not getting the heat into the engine correctly, the point of the patent, personally I think the boiler and H.E. are inseparable.

Another problem, their Stirling engine comes in only one capacity only, 3.2 or 6.4 kWe depending upon which way the wind blows, fairly small at that. If you are talking furnaces or turbines then I guess there is a lot of waste heat floating around and then you’ll need bigger capacity engines or lots of them!

Also its worth bearing in mind that the H.E. was designed by the original Norwegian team of, I think, 4 guys working for Disenco. Their names appear on the patents, I doubt Inspirit have changed the design and the patents will expire soon.

So a lot of design work, AKA expense, will be required to adapt to true waste heat recovery. There never has been waste heat recovery expertise in Inspirit unless JG and his wife have been taking night classes.

JR69: You have to be having us all on !!!

Did he explain why every single RNS for the last umpteen years has bombed? Did he explain why the Charger has never appeared ? Why would 'The Chief Engineer' leave. Don't they have teams of people working on different applications - as per the RNS statements.

God it defies belief !

JR69: All been raised before several months ago by me but I was shouted down by the faithful as a deramper and a shorter. I think now people are less convinced of the Inspirit story or perhaps is it fairy tale !

Inspirits RNS statements are a collection of unfulfilled and broken promises carefully crafted to say virtually nothing of substance. They appeal to the dreamers desperate to make their fortune the easy way but very few ever do !

Found it, Rotherhithes Medical dictionary gives it as:

Veteris Caeruleum Stupidus

OLdblue: CH has stated a couple of times, I think, that he is not interested in the Charger but waste heat recovery on a larger scale. As usual you seem oblivious to what has gone before. You answer questions that have not been asked and don't answer question that have been asked.

There must be a medical term for it

While we are on the subject of efficiencies ! Inspirit have made gain that their boiler was on successful trial with the carbon Trust. The only reference I have found is the report 'Micro-CHP Accelerator Final Report -March 2011' This was the Disenco device that was trialled. While the report gives no figures for a specific manufacturer Figure 3.6 shows the electrical efficiencies of all those devices taking part in the trial - NOT ONE achieved an electrical efficiency above 10%. Therefore the Disenco device - soon to become the charger - did not achieve 10%

Oldblue: Think beyond the simple calculations, I understand you will be blinded by the pound signs.

1. Start with 18kW because some of your input will be lost to the environment
2. What happens in summer, especially if you don't have a swimming pool ?
3. What heat do you get when producing 6.4kWe ?
4. What happens to the 6.4kWe if you don't use it, yes it could be exported but what price do you get ?
5. Where do you get you electricity when you don't have the boiler on e.g. during the late evening or night ?
6. Alternatively to the above if the boiler is ticking over, what electricity do you get out of it ?
7. Could charge your car during the night, yes but where does the heat go - storage of course - then more installation costs.

It isn't easy calculating your gains over a full year, a lot of detail is required to determine if the purchase and installation costs make it worthwhile.

Oldblue: We've been through this months ago. Welcome to the party, you can help tidy up !