Member Info for Phimx

If you are all Inspirit investors why do you allow the board to spend your money and give you nothing in return for 10 years.
They can't be bothered to keep you informed, they treat you like s***e yet you mindlessly support the company why ?

Why don't you direct your comments to John Gunn, ask him for answers. Ask him why effort is being spent on waste heat recovery when the Charger (millions of potential sales) should be launching.

He's not giving his money away to you !

US78666153B2 - Displacer Piston Assy (for Stirling Engine) Held by Somemore ltd. originally by Disenco

Expired 12-03-2019 due to failure to pay maintenance fee

Happy to oblige

Mistakes and changing timelines due to external factors are inevitable and perhaps could be excused given further details.

Since no contracts for certification, manufacture, suppliers, outlets, publicity, job adverts, service ..... etc were announced,
then one can only wonder whether the statement was deliberate or intentional " ready to go into the market" has been proved with the passage of time to be misleading and absolutely incorrect.

John Gunn's failure to correct his comments or apologise for his words suggests it was intentional. Continued failure to correct important mistakes, which would significantly affect the share price and investors perceptions, cast doubt on the character of the Inspirit company.

Only the apathy and stupidity of Inspirit shareholders allow the BoD to act this way

Explain yourself John Gunn

John Gunn on YouTube 27 May 2016 the following words came from his mouth

"Today we're pleased to say the product is now READY to go into the market. We are actually manufacturing our first units"

If it was ready to go into the market then I would assume that all certification had been completed and the product was CE marked. I do not remember these requirements being announced by Inspirit, obviously that announcement would have been a monumental and eagerly awaited milestone for the product. The product was READY no ifs or buts it was READY.

Second sentence - How many units were 'actually' being manufactured ? 2, 200, 2,000 .... another totally statement open to the wild speculation of people like Oldblue. Why couldn't John Gunn simply say our first batch of x units is now being manufactured.

B******T

People bought on those words. If I was an investor I'd be mighty unhappy

Oldblue: Perhaps John Gunn had been reading too many of your posts and actually started to believe he was going to get rich

John Gunn on YouTube 27 May 2016 the following words came from his mouth

"Today we're pleased to say the product is now READY to go into the market. We are actually manufacturing our first units"

Utter Utter Utter rubbish - 4 years later not a single unit has been seen by the British public AND the explanation from Inspirit for this gigantic failure ............................. total silence. Presumably many investors bought into Inspirit based upon these words spoken by John Gunn.

Oldblue: When did Inspirit announce the completion of the boiler ? In 2016 J Gunn announced they were making their first units !! That statement has misled a lot of people.

When does mass production begin ???? When do sales begin ??? When does production launch begin ??

A picture on a web site isn't proof

After 10 long years no one can even tell what electric and thermal output it produce AT THE SAME TIME.

Why does a bona fide company have so many secrets, produce ambiguous information and fail to keep investors updated with real information ?

Some computer generated image on a web site is no proof it exists - try buying one -

It's normally when Oldblue has posted some made up story e.g. joint ventures, engineering partners, testing a non existent boilers.

Particularly when it can't be backed up with a single shred of evidence. The only joint venture is Volvo sent a letter and Inspirit received it.

Oldblue: Your point is ?

My wife makes £125 per week and I'm a psychiatrist

does that mean it cannot be leveled ?

Build it and they will come - if they can find the factory !

That will be the charger that has yet to be built.

Everyone still waiting, after a decade, for the announcement that says it has been built.

First you build it THEN you test it, your sequence is test it then build it - I'm not sure that works. But, I'm a basher what do I know.

Edit: The interesting one is - US6931848B2: Stirling Engine having platelet heat exchanger elements

Patents: I’ve been able to find the following patents related to Somemore Ltd. Disenco Ltd and Inspirit Energy.

EP2102958A2 Somemore – withdrawn 18 Jan 2012
EP1886010A1 Somemore – withdrawn 06 April 2012
GB0608271D0 Disenco – withdrawn 12 Sep 2007
W02006114617A1 Disenco – status not known
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

This one is interesting, it is the patent for the platelet heat exchanger for a Stirling engine and is essential for applying heat to the working gas inside the \Stirling. I have to own up, I thought this was designed and patented by the 5 Norwegians but I was wrong.

In 2006 Disenco had the rights to this technology but they went bust

6 October 2010 Somemore (John Gunn) obtained the rights but then the rights were transferred several times and were subject to a Patent Security Agreement i.e. the patents were used as security against some kind of loan but the rights are now held by Qnergy Inc USA. That’s not to say Inspirit via Somemore could not have some form of license agreement to use the technology.

The only patent I can find and actually owned by Inspirit Energy is this

WO2012013982A2 Quasi Resonant Braking Load - published 2013

This patent relates to dissipating energy of an electric motor under braking, therefore having little to do with a Stirling heat engine.

From RNS 13 Nov 2019

Inspirit intends to explore opportunities to license out the underlying technology and the Directors believe that, in some instances, the patents owned by Inspirit may be also used in the development of products other than a mCHP appliance.

I CALL UPON JOHN GUNN TO CLARIFY THE PATENTS HELD BY INSPIRIT ENERGY RELATING TO THE CHARGER AND STIRLING ENGINES

Hide behind the filter button sonny

Oldblue: Proven wrong - care to expand upon that statement ? Certainly you seem to lack the ability to respond to any arguments in a meaningful way. You replies are poorly written and often difficult to decipher, they invariably miss the point and have little to do with the point under discussion. You can't point to any evidence to corroborate your assertion that a working and up-to-date Charger exists, whereas I can reference RNS evidence which states it continues to be developed.

You only response to facts is to ignore them and waffle on about bashers and derampers, that will not change the fact that there will be no Charger this year. Once again another aborted launch another abject failure. From a lack of news regarding contracts to build or promote the launch then that alone signals to me that is was never intended to happen. Inspirits silence is deafening.

Yes Oldblue, been busy bashing the unsubstantiated, substandard, subnormal rubbish you churn out.

So much for an exciting GM. Back to reality !

Oldblue: In reply to your message below
"maidit308 flow boiler wasnt stirling it was a rankine cycle much different and only produced MAX 1kw output garbage really mr buffalo 2014 rns hay a unit in field trials (wow they must off made one)

https://www.lse.co.uk/rns/INSP/barchester-healthcare-trials-vcjt39xrw1tpmij.html

and before you say anything il imagine it didnt go well which is why it when back into r and d

Can you produce ANY EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER that this trial was EVER carried out ? As you say if, by a thousand to 1 chance, it did then why wasn't it reported.
You also suggest Inspirit made a Charger of some form but at this date they only had the device built by Disenco. Try and stretch your memory, Inspirit were simply turning the Disenco device into a commercial product i.e. they were not starting from scratch. So far they have failed to do that - 10 long years later. They couldn't handle the job plain and simple and underestimated the costs and effort required to do so -assuming the thing they bought from Disenco actually did what they said.

I have lots of evidence of failed achievements, partnerships, discussions, trials and lack staff and of course a total lack of a product to go on the shelves- all written by Inspirit themselves. You on the other hand have not one shred of evidence for your arguments for this company. The simple fact that Inspirit could not demonstrate a working device to Volvo, after 10 years, speaks for itself !