Member Info for pauldrayton

I suspect Anth is right and the Darwin East FPSO is ‘planned’ rather than anything else. I say that because he’s also mentioned a second FPSO for Sea Lion and they haven’t reached FID for the first yet.

Positive to get a mention though.

Unless we are about to see another partner announced shortly alongside a plan to fast-track the whole shebang! That would be nice but probably wishful thinking.

Market-Dealer (aka Garbled, Essex, Sparrow, SparrowCove, Falky, FalklandInvestor etc etc) - you have spent the best part of two decades proving time and time again that you have absolutely no inside information whatsoever. Years and years of nudges, winks, Sharon’s waffle, IMOs, the rest is yours etc etc. Not a single thing you have ever said has been proved correct.

Now you’re saying Sea Lion has been delayed by 2-3 years yet at the same time you’re ramping BOR.

Just give it up. Stop pretending. You don’t fool anybody.

If it’s your opinion that Sea Lion will be delayed then just say that - you might even be proved right, although nobody else including Navitas are saying so. But there is little point in insinuating that you have any knowledge on the matter because you have proved more than anybody else on these forums that you don’t.

Indeed guso. Keeping my eyes peeled for part two.

Water off a duck’s back LTT! I realise people don’t generally like to hear a less than positive opinion on a company whose shares they are holding. I try to be honest but I have nothing against BOR (or their shareholders!) and hope they do secure a partner for Darwin. It’s my opinion that they are a long way behind RKH but I would be happy to be proven wrong.

No problem - yes the Darwin East rereference must relate to BOR. It doesn’t appear on the chart that’s posted alongside the text though for some reason, nor does the second FPSO for Sea Lion (perhaps those two are provisional dependent on other events).

No problem buffit, although I can’t post the chart:

** Upcoming FPSOs in South America - 2025 to 2030 Part One ***

• The South American FPSO industry is poised for significant growth by 2030, driven by factors including increased offshore oil and gas production, technological advancements, and favorable government policies

• Brazil will spearhead growth within the region, with plans to deploy six FPSOs specifically for the Buzios cluster of fields. Other prominent fields for FPSO deployments include Atapu, Bacalhau, and Mero (Libra Noroeste)

• Guyana too, is set to significantly bolster its oil and gas output by commissioning five FPSOs for fields such as Longtail, Tripletail, Yellowtail, and Pinktail

• In the Falkland Islands, two FPSOs are slated for the Sea Lion fields, and a FPSO is planned for the Darwin East field

• Suriname is planning an FPSO to serve the GranMorgu, Krabdagu, Sapakara, and Sapakara South fields.

The chart below shows the first part of the planned and announced FPSOs for the South America between 2025 and 2030

Https://www.linkedin.com/posts/adrian-mason_fpso-upstream-oil-activity-7329339884719017984-_7at

• In the Falkland Islands, two FPSOs are slated for the Sea Lion fields, and a FPSO is planned for the Darwin East field

Https://www.linkedin.com/posts/adrian-mason_fpso-upstream-oil-activity-7329339884719017984-_7at

• In the Falkland Islands, two FPSOs are slated for the Sea Lion fields, and a FPSO is planned for the Darwin East field

Careful now Mogger, Rookie & Phil don’t like facts being discussed on here.

Talking about baseless ideas Ukoil, was this you in March 2024:

“10p plus here very soon”

?

You lasted 45 minutes before responding!

I don’t think there was sufficient volume for them to have bought all those shares on the open market, hence my theory.

Phil,

Mogger said:

“ Warrants have been issued as payment for services received by the company because they couldn't pay the bills AT THE TIME”.

I’ve added the caps because you seem to have missed that part.

It looks like the broker now wants to sell some of the warrants.

You do realise that in order for the two large shareholders to have increased their holdings, another person or people have to have sold.

I’m amazed I have to explain that to you, and I can certainly prove it by the very fact it’s happened!

I suggested that the two TR1 notifications were because a large holder offloaded to two others Rookie. I still think that’s the case, unless you have evidence to the contrary?

Why on earth would anybody on the RKH board have anything against BOR? Quite the opposite I would think. In fact I’ve personally held pretty much every Falkland O&G company shares over the years, and I suspect others have either.

Some people may have a difference of opinion on the current prospects of each company, which is fair enough, but I doubt there is anything vindictive in that.

The only person I’ve seen trying to tell others to sell one to buy the other is Market-Dealer.

What predictions have I made that haven’t come true Rookie?

Just one will suffice.

What’s your theory then Rookie?

It’s notable how you consistently decline to discuss any matter related to the company.

I quite agree Supra.

It’s a telltale sign when people get personal.

Anthrazit has been a problem poster for many years and has a history of pumping duds - he doesn’t like being called out.

Shenandoah first oil in circa 4 weeks assuming no delays.

Thin volume at the moment.

Perhaps need some news - Ombrina Mare just going on and on, but every day everything gets closer.

Anthrazit, I’m sure many people here won’t remember USOP but I certainly do, and you were one of their greatest cheerleaders!

For those who don’t know the history - look it up. You’ll have a right laugh.