RE: Fossil fuels9 Jun 2023 11:41
I don't have any objection to the argument that Humanity must make more use of renewables - I believe it's a fact that enough solar energy falls on the planet every day to power absolutely everything, if only it could be captured.
Also, the oceans are an untapped resource for food and energy, which is only just starting to be understood (perhaps too late?).
The big problem is that our energy needs are growing, but are not developed in a planned and coordinated way. I read somewhere that, for example, new UK off-shore wind farms being constructed right now may not be able to connect to the National Grid for as much as 15 years. Imagine investing in the 'absolute certainty' of such a resource, only to discover that it's going to stand there, completely useless, perhaps until 2040 (for the pedants, that's for wind farms currently under construction, or about to be constructed, but which won't be completed for a while yet).
On that basis, projects like SL look somewhat attractive, as virtually all the World's infrastructure in place now is powered by fossil fuel.
When did you pass a building site and see electric-powered heavy equipment, or an airport, where all the aircraft have electric engines, or ships powered with electric motors, etc?
In any case, even if they were electric-powered, how would that electricity be generated across most of the World?