Member Info for Orangetree

I don't understand why TW is endorsing this company given that Greek bureaucracy has set it back for God's know how many time! Then there is the funding for this project. Who will fund it?

Having research SGI http://www.stockopedia.com/content/10-signs-of-trouble-at-rare-antiques-dealer-stanley-gibbons-108738/, the one thing that should worry shareholders is cash in the bank. Here's why: The company�s cash cycle historical average is 300-400 days. Now, it averages 700 days. That increase meant the company needed to borrow money to meet its working capital. A look at the change in cash cycle days should tell you about its short-term liquidity constraints. In 2012, its cash cycle was 375 days with daily expenses of �82.8k. Therefore, working capital required is �31.05m. By 2014, working capital required has increased to �69.72m, and a year later its �101.47m. The working capital increase in 2014 was �38m, but the company raised �39m in equity to pay for its acquisitions, and that has �offset� the increase in debt. The working capital increase in 2015 from 2014 was �31.75m, this was funded by all the cash in the bank, along with a �2.5m overdraft, so a total of �12m. The company borrowed an extra �9.2m, along with the increase in liabilities coming from pensions, tax and other payables amounting to �4.9m, along with the sale of �4.4m of a freehold property, a total of �30.5m. So, the result coming out for March 2016, will there be a further increase in cash cycle days?

Looking at the technicals of RTN, I see a rare buying opportunity presenting itself from the charts. And thanks to BREXIT the technical patterns is forming itself into a buy. Click and judge for yourself: http://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=RTN.L&p=W&yr=11&mn=0&dy=0&id=p20605875327&a=466566124

Did a bit of research and found out about the following: 1. Sales growth in the last eight yrs averages 28.5%/annum, but no profit made! 2. Sale per employee fell from £317k in 2008 to £286k today, while the cost per staff went up by 65% over that period. 3. AO World paid bankers' fee "1/3" of gross proceeds to float on the market compared to BOOHOO's 4.6%. 4. Since listing it made an average loss of £6m/year, but management claims these losses are down to the costs of its European division. For more information: http://www.stockopedia.com/content/ao-world-value-stock-or-bear-trap-141473/.

BBC report on Alton towers visitors numbers down by 25%. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-stoke-staffordshire-36399128

The company should hire a new accountant because he/she can't distinguish what is "gross profit" and what is "operating profit"! BTW, the company is burning cash to kingdom come!

The reality of being ahead of the curve! With a market cap of £510m, you would expect the company to be in the commercial phase, not the clinical phase. Maybe I'm biased but I prefer OPTI.

The correlation between MRW grocery market share and its share-price performance is correlated, see the chart on https://twitter.com/Wh_biz32. Yesterday sales rise would be irrelevant unless they're able to gain back its market share and maintain its operating margins. We need to look at the whole picture, instead of being concerned of bits and pieces.

Mould I would advise you to sell QPP now, whilst you have the chance! It's a one-time offer only. Take it or leave it kind of moment.

Mould, If you read my article on the link you, would have known I posted it last in March 2014. Guess what Naibu's share price was when I wrote it: 80p - 94p. Guess where the share price now: Yes it is suspended at 11.5p. So investors, that have read my article and heed my warnings would have saved almost all of their money. You could have gone out and treat yourself instead of handing your money over to Naibu! Seriously, 'lamb to the slaughter' is an understatement in this case!! Another important thing you should know, there is no transparency in China when it comes to accounting. For instance, if the company reported cash on its balance sheet, it could well be a loan borrowed from the bank. Come on, even Simon Thompson admitted (finally!) the company's behaviour was dodgy. If Naibu is authentic, it will have bought itself out at 30p/share, valuing it at £18m easily if we believe it has £35m in cash.

It's sad to see people lose money when they are relying on the 'true and fair view' of the company's accounts. For me, the business model do not stack up. Take its strategy for example, Naibu mentioned being the only sportswear to operate in tier 3 and 4 cities in China, where rivals hardly have a foothold. I say, Naibu is telling a bunch of lies because rivals like Li-Ning been operating for a long time. Here is my assessment of the company: http://www.stockopedia.com/content/is-naibu-global-international-the-most-undervalued-stock-in-the-market-yes-says-simon-thompson-bull-vs-no-says-lucien-miers-bear-81860/. Sad day for Naibu's shareholders!