Member Info for NettlesTheCat

Not for this board, but SOLG BOD sold far too cheap in my humble opinion but I did double my stake in around 3 months so as long as we don't hold emotional ties with these AIM shares, we should all be fine with the outcome. 👍

I should add I sold my entire SOLG today based on takeover at 28p so put half in here as top up and half into KOD as top up..

Best of luck all.

... a slower increase (what the hell I hear you say, it's 7% up today) - so I'll add it's nice to see what I call a sustained increase. No point pin balling around - the day chart looks extremely promising in terms of long term growth and I know it's way to early to suggest such a thing, but I'm just staring my views.

My goal of £24 per share has been adjusted to £20 a share sell in 2029.

That'l suit me.

Doubled my money in a few of months, no emotional ties to this company. Topped up KOD and WSBN with proceeds.

Good luck to those holding - I hope you get another interested party and it enters a bidding war 👍

Hold for Gold don't they say? 🙏🏻

"3 confirmed interested parties 1 offer on table let the games begin !"

Should rocket once another offer is put forward. 4.00 anyone?

You know that saying "No one in history has ever choked to death from swallowing his pride."?

Totally agree DazzerG - your post is the best post I've read on all the boards today.

Understand all of that chaps, but the word 'expedite' was used out of context here that got the raise we have seen recently pre consolidation.

Shareholders/MMs/Stakeholders (whatever you want to call them), reacted to the RNS hence the 25% decline.

In my humble opinion, it would have been far better to issue as RNS re hole 1 and 2 to simply say "results are promising but not confirmed until essential assay results are back, which could take up to 18 weeks".

No massive gain, no massive loss, just a sensible SP along the way.

I had a conversation here this morning with Skippy in relation to the use of the word 'expedite". It was used in context from the BOD to show they are expediting the transport, not the actual assay - which in essence is correct, however, the word 'expedite' was carefully managed to suggest that would/should include an expedite process of the assay. Those the facts for any shareholder reading the RNS, whether you like it or not.

Hence the decline today to suggest assay results are months away (maybe Feb/March?).

My reason for posting this, is because unlike others, I am a great believer in WSBN - you don't have to be a genius to realise the location geographically to what we all know was phenomenal.

Therefore, not all 'negative' comments suggest someone is deramping the stock, in the same way not all 'positive' comments suggest the poster is a single minded ramper.

I actually listen more to those who have a levelled head with any stock - it's not as simple as rampers and derampers, hence my post being clear and true in how I see it.

Never use the word expedite if you feel the next stage could not only hinder that speed, but actually work against it - shareholders don't like it.

But I still hold, in profit still, as I feel this is blip due to bad wording and we will return to post £1 very soon.

Best of luck all.

Nettles 🐈‍⬛

"You can disagree as much as you want - but the above is the wording from the RNS and it clearly refers to transporting of the cores. I read it that way when it was released. It still says the same thing. And in context it just means sending the cores."

Well, the markets agree with me today. Let's leave it there.

Totally disagree with you Skippy. Wording should be clear and concise in any RNS regardless of how your natural or personal dialect may differ.

FASTEST MARATHON EVER RUN..... for a one legged tortoise

TALLEST BUILDING EVER BUILT..... by four year old using lego

WORLD PEACE ..... may happen sometime soon

Don't use the word 'expedite' If surrounding factors may effect the very core of that fact.

"If you can read then it was very clear that the word ‘expedite’ was used in the context of sending the cores to the lab quickly and not in the context of the assay testing."

If you can read, I simply said the word 'expedite' should never have been used.

It's like me 'expediting' a parcel from my house to the post office around the corner to then use a 12 week delivery service.

"I laugh when I see posts that imply company is refusing to release assay results."

I've not read anyone suggesting WSBN are delaying the results themselves. I'm suggesting the word 'expedite' shouldn't have been used.

I'm not sure calling people idiots for them questioning if the word 'expedite' should have been used to in relation to assay results is sensible.

"Assay results will be released over the next few months, and the plan for 2026 will be announced when all results are collated. The Red Setter Dome breccia and surround Diorite remain key targets, based on assay results to date."

As well all know, this is all about the assay results. I think the word 'expedite' needs has a different meaning for some.

That’s a great post Copperhands 👍

AICommand, I understand your point. KOD got 100m for their mining (with zero increase in SP even after Spod on site - 44k tonnes).

Again, not being negative, I want this to boom! I'm invested in many mining entities and it's good to witness the parallel in pre and post mining with or without partnerships, and with or without off take/take off agreements.

Always good to be open to facts rather than pipe dreams.

Therefore:

"So, I believe share price would nicely hold between £1.50 and £1.80 until production starts. Then it will slowly go over £5+"

It's an awesome hope, but not supported with like minded mines. KOD had almost zero gain once the shipment began (and was already less than 50% of pre mine SP). Hopefully that changes once the balance sheet at next quarter shows the input, and that's all I'm trying to say here. Basic calculations on EMH do not suggest £1.50 in any shape or form. Half that price is realistic in my humble opinion. But obviously very happy to be proved wrong.

To be honest gsdsitgs, that was never the case. Yes, right wing publications wanted to share such info (two French news agencies got shifted out by the Junta for purporting such crap).

Essentially, KOD isn't dissimilar to EMH if true facts are known. KOD only have to go south to port through Côte d'Ivoire (away from any issues that aren't actually apparent anyway).

Off take at port is 95% payment. If anything, it's a better deal over EMH.

So, although I don't want to sound negative on this (EMH) awesome stock, the basic calculations can't be set in stone here.