Member Info for NettlesTheCat

My humble opinion; the word 'expedite' in terms of transportation of breccias would never had been used as it was always going to have negative connotations when there was a delay in actually assays.

Since then, we've been told that the assays should be back before Feb and that they don't really matter anyway as we're sitting on something bigger than even Donald Trump could describe (yes, that big). 😂

So the price is simply getting back to where it was and will hopefully continue to make steady ground up to Feb.

Not ramping here but there isn;t really anything in the RNS we didn't expect/know already and we should see this as the last results during the transition process. As Wooldridge puts it:

"We have a very exciting period ahead of us and I look forward to reporting on our progress in 2026 as the Project transitions into a fully-fledged revenue generating mining operation."

Is your screen the wrong way up? It's 10% up today.

"Good to see your messages back on here"

So here we go again TJ 😂. I'm ready for the crap aimed against me to suggest my £20 goal here come 2032 is wrong, but as you well know, I've battled that fight before with RR 😂.

Let's see - I remember saying £7 close with RR, so let's start with £20 close here.

Good luck to you all.

"Good evening nettles. I hope all is well? I will buy you that pint sometime soon."

Lovely to see you here TJ. I trust you are well also? And yes, being a cat prone to a pint, I'll certainly get you one back sir.

I really think WSBN is the next silly increase (as well as IMM) so heads down and let's hope for the best my friend 👍

"Good to hear from you NTC glad your OK missed your inspiration good job svend been keeping us entertained and up to date"

Bless you sir - Svend has always been captain here and such a solid guy (I've communicated with him since my recent personal issues).

Well, now you have me back and I'll pull up the ropes a little to back the captain up - just a quick love-a-thon with PEAK as well. Two people you'd wish were your best mates in life... but that's enough of my hugging and love fest 😂. As long as you guys are awesome, that's all that matters.

"I'm into RR on 3X as you know. I reckon I could be about at £13.00 ish...."

Great to hear from you again Berny - you had the big boy holding? Gees, I'm sure that 3x has worked wonders for you.... are you buy Svend a new battle ship? I could do with a new dingy if I dare to ask for anything? 😃

Awesome it's worked well for you buddy - very happy for you sir 👍

Nah - I'm out at £12. Sorry all!

Far too many more interesting mining stocks I've been invested in for the last few months that are giving greater gains (for me).

But yes, RR will certainly reach £30 at some point - and the best of looks to all those that hold after xmas 👍

Ha, ha - missed you ShareFlyer - but yes, I did say £7 close in Feb 2025 from 2020. Apologies if you don't remember, many here do.

I hope you are well.

Totally agree with you.

I work very closely (in my line of work) with a LTD company with a 55m turnover this year (up 10% every year) and they could easily go to AIM if they felt the need for extra cash - they don't convert as they don't need the money. The vast amount of AIM stocks need cash so they float early, mostly pre any physical entity (in this case mining) but once the very few get through to mining status, the shareholders should and will prosper. It's actually that simple in my humble opinion.

Whether the BOD like the fact that original shareholders gain from the final entity is not an issue - they issued they stock, we bought, and we're in for the ride ahead.

Heads down, long term gains, and good for every shareholder that envisaged such gains.

Just a quick hello from me - it's been a while. Whilst on that mini boat Svend agreed I should venture out on, the tides got a little choppy personally so I've been eating watermelon from that dingy of mine to kill a bit of time until things got a bit better.... and I don't want to talk to early, but things are certainly looking better from a personal perspective.

Anyway, enough about me - RR still looking good for that £12 goal (come xmas) I mentioned when this hit my £7 goal (in Feb 2025).

I hope you are all keeping extremely well, and I look forward to being more involved now.

All the best!

Nettles 🐈‍⬛

I agree. My sell on this is £20.

"What the F" I hear you say? But yes, I can't access fully (based on SIPP until I'm 58) so that's 7.5 years for me.

Said the same with RR back in 2020 at 31p that it would get to £7 in 2025 (Feb), and it did.

Not here to big my claims up, just simply saying what I see. I think the £20 goal will be hit prior to my 7.5 year goal but that's a conservative figure based on Greatland MCap at this moment in time.

I may, or may not, sell at £20 in that time frame - good luck all.

Just wanted to pump this thread a little. I don't get into the LSE board politics very much as I like to talk facts and news that is important to any holder or potential buyer of any share at any time.

But on this occasion, I feel apologies are owed from a few to Casper786. This guy put his neck on the line (maybe sometimes he was overly zealous) but always suggested with good knowledge why this share would sore.

The recent downturn in SP due to consolidation and lack of assay results (we can argue the point of whether the word 'expedite' would ever have been used on another thread), doesn't mean a jot in the LTH timeframe a serious investment.

So if nobody here apologises to you Casper (for their recent abuse against you), you should know your efforts on this board (heard by the likes of me who usually remain silent) are very welcome and more than often very correct in the end.

Carry on dude - ignore the crap.

Nettles 🐈‍⬛

Yes, nice to see these somewhat steady gains back to pre assay value.

Chef, you are talking about every stock with those comments. Difference here is that we have something.

I invested years ago at 0.09p knowing/hoping it would come good with a drilled mine and take-off, and I'm not blind to the fact that we haven't seen an increase that was due is SP since then, hell it was 0.84 pre mine a few years ago.

But now all is settled, take-off is agreed by not only a sole entity but an entity that is heavily invested in KOD as well, it would be silly to think (once the balance sheet is shown for the next for quarterly results), that this MCap should be where it should be.

Patience is bitter, but its fruit is sweet.

" It is forecasted to reach over $300-400 billion annual revenue by 2030, which is less than five years from now."

Suits me - I'm 50. Can't touch my SIPP until I'm 58 (I know it's 55 now, but it will be 58 for me).

Not being greedy, just need a certain amount to draw the 25% on, then leave the rest on a constant annual draw down.

"And so hush-hush"

Although I'm a September 2025 buyer, I do agree with you - awesome work by the BOD. But I guess if you're sitting on a money mound this big, you can take your time and negotiate the best deal with zero leaks.

...also, going for the singular license deal immediately puts the first hurdle into bidding war and therefore maximises initial value.

I think we all agree that licensing is now far more likely than a takeover so the next question is, what does that licensing look like?

I can only see two options:

1) I singular license granted to a high paying global entity that want's it for themselves.

or

2) Many licenses granted to individual companies at various costs due to their initial requirements (much like a patent in terms of locality etc).

Which one is more beneficial to IMM?

Personally, I feel IMM will go for a singular licence grant that allows that company to offer further managed licenses. Reason being is that I don't feel IMM are big enough to control the idea of a multi license deal and I feel they will be clever enough to firm a deal that will follow royalties all the way to the end of the end user.

Simply put, IMM license once to the likes of Eli Lilly, with grounds to gain from every licence Lilly decide to then offer and gain 'royalties' from thereafter on the continued chain of licensing agreements.

The reason I feel this will be the best case is that there is then no limit of what IMM can achieve and the SP/MCap doesn't become stagnant on what some may consider a one trip pony sell of license.

For IMM to manage multiple licenses at this stage would simply be out of their remit.

IMHO.

There have been no quarterly results since the massive news of finally getting spod to port.

Even the next results might not show it, so either hold tight and go long or get out now.