RE: CC's POSITION6 Sep 2023 13:59
Good afternoon tonyj,
What was the " .... discussion on why CC does not go for Cellular/RF i.e. the whole lot. I seem to remember it was politics."
What was the outcome?
I mentioned in my post at 14:21 yesterday, that I would not expect and Cellular competitor, or any other competitor to give up any of their market share, without a fight. The tendering process is where some of the battles are fought. In my opinion.
The Omnimesh Cellular solutions, developed by CyanConnode and released during 2018, I think, are an option for CyanConnode in certain circumstances. I do not know what the circumstances are specifically - terrain/buildings, etc., - but the option is there.
The exact SLAs for Cellular, I cannot recall, but they may vary with each individual Cellular provider, within different terrains.
Indore was a very successful project for CyanConnode and Partners. As was the fore-runner, the IPv4 project in Mysore, which set the bar at new heights until the IPv6 projects set the bar even higher. I do not know how the " ...... Indore installs of residences and Feeders ...... " were constructed, of if they were a " .... mixture of Cellular/RF....." Nor do I know who installed the Cellular.
I believe the last paragraph in you 11:56 post, I have answered within my second paragraph of this post, which is the way I view it.
I hope this is of some help, tonyj.
LTI.