RE: lindon12 Jun 2013 01:26
Hi Lucan, yes I still rate it as a strong buy. Even more so on any weakness. It was always going to be marked down simply because everything is focused on CIT at the moment & the admittance that Amtel are still behind on resolving the quality control issues. The results are ok...ish, but they will been seen as disappointing by the analysts, no real worries tho... they'll get over it! I think that even if you take CIT completely out of the equation a fair price for CAR would be around £4. 50. & looking good to grow into the future, they ARE a good, sound, profitable growing company EVEN without CIT. There is hardly ANY downside as a normal investment so WITH CIT ... Wow! But there is STILL a risk with CIT & that risk... like all risks... SHOULD NOT be ignored. The sp price does not lie... It's showing that risk. They can get all the design wins in creation, they can sign up tier 1 to tier 10 customers by the bucket load. they can talk about ramping up to the sky & back... but unless they can get the new production lines validated all the talk won't mean a thing. Atmel hoped to have Colorado validated by end of February... then it was confidently expected by end of May... It's still not resolved! At a design presentation a couple of weeks ago Atmel admitted that because of these delays they have had to put several tier 2/3 clients on hold but even then, they were still insisting "end of May" I understand now that there may have been some people recently sacked at Atmel over these delays. On a slightly different subject, Xsense was installed in ONLY SOME MemoPads... NOT all. Asus will not say how many have been produced with it. Also.. just for info... At that design meet Atmel stated that Asus & probably most other OEM's would most likley initially use CIT in conventional formats until they become 'comfortable' with it before trying to get clever & stick it in curved products. But they have to get there hands on it 1st & the only way they are gonna do that is to get them print lines validated!!! Only then can they swing into high volume production with proved yields. I personally think UNXL can be ignored, whether they succeed or not. But I find very telling that they have had EXACTLY the same quality control problem... so much so that they have admitted defeat in resolving it themselves & signed up Kodak who are well recognised as THE world experts in film... to help them get it sorted... & the head honcho of UNXL himself (Reed Killion) has openly stated in thier last quarterly that Kodak will take up to 50% of any revenue that Uniboss brings in... if it ever gets off the ground. I think that says everything there is to say about how difficult this problem is. Mind you... Kodak have said that their contract with UNXL is not exclusive... It doesn't exclude them from working with other copper mesh manufacturers. Hold the front page!!!