Member Info for jotom750

Agreed, many new posters today, normal trolling, just asking all their alter egos negative questions. Just a merry go round.

Keep posting that BS.
The market is against you.

Small P
Do your best, you're pushing against the market.

Newell.
I can assume that you're trying to keep the price down. Facts and information here from many great posters would tend to tell against your proposal.

David I can understand why share holders from before that date would be miffed after knowing how the price has declined, but the reality is that many of those shareholders would have held on to the stock and so potentially lost 90% or so of that £1.88. If holding the stock they would be given the value back in due course, hence they would not have taken any hit at all. Those shareholders as with all other holders did not have a crystal ball, that would in fact be an advantage to those holders if reimbursed to that full amount, would it not? I don't make the rules or conditions, there are questions over all of this. I suppose we will see how it transpires.

David.
"If the demerger is cancelled it would be common sense to return the money to the shareholders on the register on the 15th. Feb"
I was not a holder then, but how could that be achieved fairly, as to just give £1.88 per share to these holders, then negates the subsequent drop in share price, at that date price was about £6 it's now 13% of that. So in effect they could buy 7 times ( in fact possibly nearer 20 times as the spin off was a small proportion of the whole company) the number of shares that they actually had then and take unfair advantage. It's defiantly a difficult question.
GLTASH DYOR.

Obviously anything 'could' happen, but, big dividends are a way of the russ1an major shareholders legally removing money from the company which they are in dire need of. Why would they sell stock at 10% of Jan's value when staying put, observing the U.K. laws (not doing some underhand thing) and sitting tight for a few months will likely grow that by 400%?
They seem a stable legit company, the war has gotten in the way and has caused this, nothing else.
GLTASH. DYOR.

"Accordingly, the open price of Evraz will be adjusted to include the previously calculated distribution value of GBP 1.8875197296, with it subsequently reverting to its market price immediately after the open."

Wishful thinking maybe, but I read it as, before open on Monday the £1.887 will be added to Friday closing price. This due to the fact that the adjustment included price is not a quoted price as of Friday, so in effect was not the 'real' Friday price. The new price (£1.887 plus Friday close price) will then be the new "Market Price" reverting to whatever the market decides at open. Consider that there may be much selling at that time so what was £1.887 Plus Friday close could well drop quickly past £1.887 or whatever the market decides, hence the term "reverting to it's market price".
After all if it were not added, what "adjustment" would have been made?
Some have said, "Why would this be prior warned" well if it were not, the big boys would certainly have known, this is possibly in some way to level the playing field for all stockholders big or small.
As I say, maybe all wishful thinking.
GLTASH. DYOR.

Mav.
I get this message.
"The order amount is above your available spend.
Approximate order amount: 1 x 0.62 = £0.62. Available spend: £409.72
Please either amend the quantity you have entered, or fund your account by clicking Add Cash."

Obviously it does not make sense. Luckily (not due to brains) I topped up another 11K shares at 52p yesterday. Though still well under water with an average of 88p I have my fingers crossed. Will hold till the summer at least.
GLTASH. DYOR.

Yauey.
There is something odd going on, Interactive Investor shows offer over bid price, no, it's cleared now. Back to normal. No/very little spread at the moment so I would say that there is good demand for the stock.
GLASH. DYOR.

Still well in the red, but I've had no problems with having orders filled on Interactive Investor. (Maybe I should wish that I had!) Last order filled at about 16:10 at 52.2 or so. Keeping fingers crossed for common sense and reality to infect pu1in. Thought's and best wishes to all in Ukraine.
GLTASH. DYOR.

The optics of a China supporting russ1a's aggression would be terrible for their exports to the west, already there is a realisation (though belatedly) within the USA and E.U. that they have to be self supporting in high tech products. Supporting put1n would just accelerate and solidify this.

Apologies if this question has recently answered.
Is it a likely that the 50cent dividend will actually be paid on the 10th March? It now stands at a nearly 60% of stock price.
Many thanks.

Woodly. As any troll like you knows, part of your task is to dissuade others from posting. I notice that not one of my assertions has been disproved by you. Moan all you like, cast aspersions too if it makes you happy. What I posted was true, there is a thing as global warming and it is having negative effects on the planet. I do understand that in your elitist ivory tower that you care not one bit for average people, and just try in your snide way to belittle them. My replies are not for the like of you, they never are, they are for a more balanced view. That's why I said that I don't care what you think, it's obvious that people like you never change their minds. They have their "Ye Olde England" mindset, it's what keeps the UK back. It always will.

Ah, poor little woody.
People disprove his assertions (because after all why advance them) and he jumps to name calling. I'm not pulling on anything, I'm also not really bothered by what you and your kind think because one way or the other this thing is happening. Obviously the poorest will suffer as they always do, and the rich ******s who are making money from the status quo bleat on about the injustice of paying 0.00000001% more tax all the while allowing those on minimum wage to pay an extra 5%. Crocodile tears from your kind, happy to propose things, then jumps and hides when the assertions are called out for the sphericals that they are. Just more FUD.

wood/bb/ed1/etc, they are all the same trolls.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-60525591
"A new UN report on the impacts of climate change is set to be the gravest assessment yet of how rising temperatures are affecting every living thing. The study, from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), summarises several years of research. The report will likely say that the world is fast approaching the limits of adapting to climate change."

Obviously they/it will say "Fake News" they will reply to 'each other' and compliment same on their "Informative" posts and views. After all, what does the UN know?

"Nukes must be prevented at all cost. Either Ukraine surrenders or NATO backs off, "
Why do you think that?
Who started this war?
Appeasement as we all know, never succeeds.

Woody the uninformed cynic.
The US has had a million die of Covid. Clearly not important in your book. What costs are/were paid to save a few hundred lives in aircraft safety? How much did Boeing loose? How many fatalities? The cost was about $20 Billion. Were you willing to fly on one of those planes?
Re green issues, yet again you only think of yourself. Obviously global warming is a hoax, just like the extra forest fires all over the states and Europe etc and rising sea levels due to ice caps melting and flooding low lying areas more.
Simply put, America pays for NATO to place forces in Europe as an early defence system to protect themselves. A Canary in the mine so to speak.
I suppose some never have auto insurance either. Because for the first five years they never had a claim. Shame about year six. I suppose if this planet becomes barren we can all just hop in the Chevy and drive to the next one!

Absolutely! Also a chunk of all those military contracts that they will probably be frozen out from getting.

Sorry this is not directly IAG related.
On 'DW News' now. German government agrees to spend 100 Billion Euro extra this year on military, and to up spending to over 2% of GDP in future years, to develop new aircraft with France and to boost Cyber protections. To reduce dependency of individual energy suppliers.
I wonder what the trolls will say to this?