The other lot31 Aug 2018 20:15
I stand by what I said about liking the LSE board, and that I only plan to post here. Today there has been a rash of posts, several referencing me, on the 'other' board about this road issue. Many, though not all, posts have been trying to make out the BOD have conspired to deceive shareholders.
In my view they haven't, and that (deliberately or not) there have been misinterpretations.
My understanding is that the Turkish Government was, and still is, intending to re route the district road that (I think my geography is correct) runs closely past the south western edge of the pit.. At present it would prevent the mining of seams in that area which run beneath the line of the road. The JV has applied for, and obtained, permission for the re routed road to clear the likely workings. This as been accepted and the complete re routed district road will be financed, and in future maintained, by the Turkish government. As this will not occur immediately the JV has constructed a short temporary diversion to the existing district road in order that the plans for the pit can be adhered to. The eventual re routed district road will, at the relevant place, follow the line of the JV financed temporary road round the SW end of Arzu south.
The JV is not building/financing the new district road, only 800 yards of temporary road (which I envisage is a bit like a chicane).
AAUs JV partner is a construction company who (apparently) can build roads. Given that is there a problem? I have to say it isnt to me, and making such decisions is what the management are there to do. Or are shareholders to be consulted on everyday operational matters from now on? Do we want to decide what make 4X4 s they use or the brand of coffee n the canteen? No, we want them to run the company and consult shareholders where necessary. And if I reached a stage when I no longer trusted the BOD to know when shareholders should be consulted or at least informed then I would sell my holding and invest elsewhere.
I was the one wo asked the question about the road at AS, though others joined the discussion on the night. I dont feel I was lied to or misled in any way unless someone who was actually there can correct me (I am more than fallible, I may have misunderstood something, if I have understood I'm sure there will be posts).
I think I am feeling a bit miffed because, due to critical reactions being expressed on the other board in part referencing myself, the BOD may not be as forthcoming (and timely) in their replies to queries from myself or other genuinely interested parties in the future That worries me as one of the things I like about this company is the boards approachability and willingness to engage in discussion.
Next time I will probably consider finding a way to contact certain of the posters on this board without publishing it for general consumption, because I don't want what I say to be used as a weapon to bash the company with.
John