Member Info for IntrepidInvestor

Hi tred.
Not really. I based my earlier figures on the closing prices my software saw and then I adjust for size.
So I never saw 40p. From memory that was a pre-market morning price and in market size (25.000 shares).
To sell 1m, will usually cost 1p+ on the bid price, poss more.
The highest closing Bid price I saw was 36p and I assumed 34p bid for 1m. That’s about £200k profit.
All gone now.
Intrepid.

Hi davethedumpling.

Certainly less likely than the motley crew that assembled on BBs like this.
Intrepid.

Hi all
I’ve bought in via the placing via a broker. Most of the shares have gone to ii’s but some had to be offered to ri’s because one major ii insisted.
This thing shouldn’t dip below 0.35p as this is the value pre-placing added to money raised after costs. Also, most are held by ii’s, who are less likely to sell.
Regards
Intrepid.

Hi all.
Why do people think this stock is still connected somehow with the IP it sold recently.
My understanding is it’s a shell with enough cash to hopefully see a RTO thru in the next few weeks as listed co then a few more months as delisted Aim shell.
My money is on a previously unconnected RTO suitor. But I think it’s very likely to be sorted given the fact that one ii took the whole placing and put in more than were seeking.
I’ve sold half my holding when it doubled so am in for free.
Intrepid.

Hi tredcare.
At the height of my holding, the average was just shy of 14p.
Intrepid.

Hi Jumny-stocks.
Rumbled? For what? For selling 95% of the 0.4% of BIDS I owed, once I made out the wood from the trees?
Not quite a ‘rumbled’ like you saying you have filtered me, when clearly you can’t have (given you have mentioned me directly regarding a post I made yesterday).
You won’t ever filter me, my friend, because, as much as it irks you, you know I post only the truth. You would rather I didn’t post it, because you perceive it hurts your investment. But the reality is the decisions of the. BoD of BIDS have harmed the SP. Not I. And you still desperately want to hear the truth, and not stuff spouted by parties paid to put it there (Briggsy for one).
That’s why you have to stay tuned in.
But I am glad, because I enjoy our exchanges.
All the best
Intrepid.

Hi AGAIN jabberba.
My aim is always the truth. If that comes across as negative, maybe you should have a pop at the ones who created that truth.
Im just the observer.
Intrepid.

Hi again Jabberba.
I was happy to leave Priggsy to their own devices, but they seem determined to push a weird thread of a debate, so I looked at their profile (which I’ve only ever done a couple of times) as it stank.
Intrepid.

Hi jabberba.
I was invited onto it. I declined as have always thought it a strange BIDS attempt to control the narrative; when, actually, all they have to do to ‘control the narrative’ is.........
SHOW ME THE MONEY!
intrepid.

Hi tredcare.
I currently own 4301 shares and £500 a point spreadbet - so 54301 technical exposure.
A far cry from the 1.01m prior to the directors sharedump.
Intrepid.

simples!

Only reason Jabberha is that they are clearly paid to be on here.
I’m happy with my track record;
1. Highlighted lack of adverts on launch of GRID2.
2. Warned of red flag signal of founders attempting to sell the maximum allowed under their agreements and then selling what they could get away with - all the while they knew no revenues (but investors didn’t).
3. Warned all I was lied to at last AGM.
4. Was pretty much spot on with my prediction that cash burn thru was £500k.
5. Still predicting funding required soon. And that it WILL be sorted.
All the above are comments on the reality. It’s the reality driving this price, not me or any other poster. But it clearly must be important, otherwise why has BIDS clearly got its own small army of posters always posting how this is the next unicorn and 3?years in 1 day nonsense.
Jabbaha, or is it James? What or who do you think everyone should listen to? Me or you?
Intrepid.

Hi dryland.
As an ex MM, I know we can’t trust the ‘buy/sell’ status of the trade reporting system.
The system has no definitive knowledge of whether a MM bought or sold any specific trade so has to assume which it is by assessing the quoted pricing.
However MM can and do trade inside the quoted price. If they have a specific order to fill or position to reverse or enhance, they may trade very close or even up to the other side of the quote. The extreme of this is if one MM ‘hits’ the other MM. they will buy or sell stock from/to the other MM at that other MMs quoted price/size. Eg. If The first MM is buying, and the quoted price is 110-114, in, say 25000, they will pay 114 for 25,000. In other words, they are bidding 114 and their real price is 114-118. As they register the trade, it will go through as 25,000 at 114, with their price being 114-118. It will register as a market ‘sell’ by these reporting systems (one that will have downwards influence on the price) when the reality is the MM has massively pushed the price up by taking out another MM. and a lesser extreme example is where a MM will quote 110-114 with every other MM but will actually pay 112.5 in size. Those trades will register as buys when they are sells. Happens all the time.
Also occurs often when one MM is seen as the ‘go-to’ MM for size and is referred to as “the market” by brokers. That MM seen as “the market” often trades way inside their own quote, particularly if they don’t want the other ‘lesser’ MMs to know what they are up to.
Cheers
Intrepid.

Hi pione3r
“Wave 2” is coming.
Guaranteed.

All the best,
Intrepid.

Hi Oiluser.

‘You pays ya money and ya takes ya choice’.
My money is now on a 2nd global wave of Covid issues, with corresponding economic knock-on.
I can’t see how we can avoid it. It’s not like people are becoming more accepting of the lockdown; quite the opposite. They are itching to get back out.
The combined weight of time and desire will endure a 2nd wave, and possibly a 3rd.
Even if they get a vaccine, it will only be available for core workers to start and then elderly/vulnerable, then everyone else. It will take a year and a trillion ‘whatevers’ to inoculate everyone.
Just my view and I’m set for it now. But we can all enjoy some fun with MTFB in the meantime.
Intrepid.

Hi Kettle.
I agree with you. Today was all about the markets.
I decided last night that I would liquidate half my non Covid non core holdings last night and short the Dow & bought something more gold.
Now positioned for COVID-19 wave 2.
Let’s hope the BOD of MTFB find a suitor before the bear returns with vengeance.
Intrepid

Seems I touched a nerve re the cosy BIDS/CDM comment. I’ve never been filtered before so they took my cherry!
Maybe they are lovers and maybe they are jimmy-slops and bottomzUp as well; trying to hold the love duo together on and off BB.
This is becoming a real soap opera.
intrepid

Hi jimmy-stocks.
I’m glad I’m not in charge as well. But if I were, the company would never have listed and you’d never have been given the opportunity to lose so much money in it.
So I guess it’s not such a good thing, if we look at it that way.
Intrepid.

Hi Brigssy68.
I think you have misunderstood my main point.
Which is: BIDS chose its office location because of the personal and now business relationship with CDM. It didn’t chose the office location prior to the relationship.
BIDS exists purely because of CDM. Without that relationship there would have been no RTO and placing. Now is the time to break away and sign other cos.
I accept that new offices will help. Latvia is there for the cheap coders. Not clients.
SAN Fran Office is where the ‘new deals’ will occur (if they ever do).
But we need them now; it’s no longer acceptable to keep posting RNSs solely about CDM deals.
That’s my main point.
Intrepid.

Hi jabberba.

It’s the preferred one of the outcomes I deem likely. I have a growing feeling that there is something ‘missing’ in the whole mix; something that is stopping advertisers placing adverts. It is most likely simply the fear of spending money on adverts that don’t work. So advertisers will need data and time to convince themselves.
One thing BIDS does not have the luxury of is ‘time’, as that equates to ‘money’.
Therefore I think BIDS will need to keep coming back for more cash. Means more dilution so not particularly attractive.
It’s an unpredictable route.
But if BIDS strikes a deal with a major ad agency, they solve the money issue and probably the issue of ‘fear’ that currently holds off the advertisers.
SFOR is the obvious choice. They are also my biggest holding (after gold and cash).
I’m guess I am being selfish in wanting SFOR as the successful suitor. But I also think they are ‘best fit’.
Hope this explains.
Intrepid.