Member Info for Hartlebury

Thanks for the help guys. Good to see a bit of a rise today!

How come Govt have only confirmed Surescreen this morning?

Are you sure you weren’t still asleep and dreaming ridoba? ;-) sounds nice...

Seriously though, I have had AJB prices go a bit weird sometimes, though not to that extent. Then it rights itself.

To be clear, I am hoping this suspension continues as long as it takes AZ to nail SH, I think it is working in his/our favour. But it’s fantasy to say that it is under his control to decide on when and how long the suspension lasts.

I said looking into, not investigating. There’s a difference.

Absolutely Rebel

It was in the flipping RNS!

Kira the FCA wouldn’t make an ongoing investigation public and it certainly wouldn’t be in the company’s interest to do so?

Which bit? Seems common sense that FCA would be in trouble if a complaint was ignored and turned out later to have substance so I don’t believe it’s a stretch to say it but it’s my opinion. The rest is what has been publicly stated on behalf of SYME

FCA handbook - chapter 5, rules on suspension. See rules 5.1.3 and 5.1.4 in particular https://www.handbook.fca.org.uk/handbook/LR/5.pdf

That’s for listing, we are already listed. All that is required is restoration to trading which takes up to 30 minutes.

As for requesting suspension (or continued suspension), the FCA has to believe that there is something preventing an orderly market in the shares. ONLY if they have reason to protect investors on this basis will a share be or remain suspended. The rule breach was deemed enough because without the financial statements the company has not released sufficient information into the market. That has now been satisfied.

We have been informed that the FCA are looking into the company (no formal investigation at the point the company released the last rns) and that is why the suspension is continuing. We know there have been allegations made by certain person(S) and the FCA would be negligent if they simply ignored these. SYME hasn’t done itself any favours in this respect with chipping and changing accounting reference date and accounting treatment of certain things - though I’m sure there must be reasons for this. So as far as we know this is continuing and we are aware of staff shortages at FCA partly due to covid.

And it’s ‘accept’

Likewise.

Um, just supposing they have chosen to continue suspension...what reason would the company have given for doing so?

It can be at any time Ohry. My bull**** message was to Kimhappy. The FCA are looking into things, we know they are slower than normal on this front due to covid. Once they are happy they will restore trading - the company does not get to delay this/choose when it happens.

Total bull****

Based on what?

Yes they can and should release rns when suspended, in line with the rules.

It’s not an admission it’s restoration of trading after suspension.

Also those results are from tests undertaken in a lab by a presumably qualified medic, not random numpties at home/work...

Uk govt saying they won’t be pursuing it because it would be discriminatory but Denmark apparently is introducing it. Wait and see what other countries do - can’t imagine it will go down well in France where anti vax sentiment is high