RE: Eds credibility29 Nov 2022 19:56
I agree Dagenham we all have to be accountable for when we buy and sell.but this is supposed to be a fund ,investors shouldn't have to trade it but obviously its only way to make in this .a poorly run fund in which its NAV has actually decreased over last 6 years!!
This idea that investors can effect the sp on the lse board is absurd.
It's Eds honesty and integrity that I question .it's the market that Ed needs to convince.
I remember in Feb 21 I think it was Ed did a PI with Katie and he was waxing lyrical about emmac,1 month later it was sold! He obviously knew it was in the process of being sold. Just like the time he sold a % of portage but didn't bother informing us? Like we don't matter.in November 21 we was informed Ed was joining the leap board to help with the IPO that had begun because of his "wealth of experience of financial and London markets".
Back then we was told leap has seen exciting growth ,continually expanding its extensive list of partnerships such as 888 and every matrix.
But a few months ago we are told leap is now worth less than we actually paid over 6 years ago??
Along with all the missed dates and times and completely wrong with predictions. It's not private investors that had destroyed the sp here,eds past is not great,he should be held to account for what he does here .he needs a big winner to restore some trust and credibility.
I mean just like he admitted ages he could have bought in here if he wanted to but he wanted to buy big?? It's the whole trust issue for me.there has been no share holder value here for us,call me cynical but it seems all Ed and his mates care about is collecting his large undeserved salary.
I want him to prove me wrong,I would be the first one to come on here and apologise .he says his reputation is everything well let's see what kind of a deal we get for leap.