Member Info for countingcards

chriszzr I am glad you don't run the company!! I know you are joking thankfully because I would be upset if it was a £2bn, £800m turnover minnow!

This is from ADVFN for the 11.05.2020. It shows the trade number, size and time it was reported.

Num. Price Size Type C T Bid Offer Time Buy Sell ?
19 0.395 15000000 O 0.31 0.35 17:15:00 15,000,000

So that the matter is concluded and we can progress this is from LSE this site:

Date Time Trade Prc Volume Buy/Sell Bid Ask Value
07-May-20 12:05:14 0.395 15,000,000 Buy* 0.31 0.35 59.25k

Whether it never showed up elsewhere is not an issue now as the proof is here.

I wouldn't be surprised given the current spread and reluctance of the MM to move on that trade if the buying activity from the 15m purchaser has not stopped. They know that there will be a few they can sweep up from margin traders who have yet to settle given recent trading volume.

If the buyer of the 15m was MG it will have taken them above to 30.4% which then is statutory bid, unless stated otherwise (very rare). So it may or may not be them, but what is clear you do not throw near £60000 at something just to take it back a few hours later!

That 15m alone was 3% of the free float eaten up in one trade (figures calculated based from their own website).SO no impact on the price leads me to believe for now the buying has not stopped and anyone selling may be adding to that holder. We shall see as for now its just a guess from me.

There has been a move from 0.32p to 0.4p then all the way back to 0.25p before a rise back into the 0.32p. At that point price began to rise on the back of a few buys especially a couple of million or so we thought, until this trade was printed.

The trade for £59250 less costs reported today on RLD for 15m was from 12.09hrs on 07.05.20. and the price was above market ask 0.38p at the time and at premium 0.395p. I believe therefore the move back down is because as munchlet announced in their post dated 24.04.2020 the MM could be struggling to meet large trades especially buys, ESPECIALLY BUYS! They are swinging the branches to grab as many shares as they can without letting it get away too quickly. A tactic that is slowly becoming more difficult. You only need one mad volume day and if I was a broker short you would be looking for a helping hand and life rafts are getting less available.

Off course tomorrow will reveal all as milli rightly says. If they have gone into sticky hands then that is another 15m to be taken off the 493m free float I estimate there is.

Milli I am slightly confused my friend. If 2nd Jan was the first day it became a cash shell then six months from this date would be 2nd July? Not 2nd June.

BarryGastard your last message worries me. I looked the timing of your message and it says 12.22hrs. I looked at my watch and it was 12.21hrs! I checked two other sources and they both said 12.21hrs. LOL. You are ahead of the rest of us by 1min! LOL

Joking aside uptrend back in normal service. Just been watching and confident 0.4p will be today or tomorrow a thing of the past.

chriszzr its nothing to do with BOU.

A_milli sorry again for late reply. This is in response to me on Friday mate.

All I know was that when I did a breakdown on holders based from their own site it reads as follow:
Total 1108172891
Mark Mitchell Greenwood 322035042
Nicholas Sibley 65287201
Ed Nealon 29644415
Anthony Brook 54961530
Sii ltd 54304379
Louis Swart 51222162
Ashwath Mehra 36911127

Free Float 493807035

Now the freefloat contains nominees which are forever changing daily as that is normally us the holders. However even if 50% of them are holding for the medium to long term the free float gets hit even more. I believe if an offer was to be made it would be close to 0.5p but if it was an RTO, then the mind boggles at what price this could seriously go to given there is very little stock out there despite the figures showing 1.1bn shares in total.

I discussed this with our major holder elsewhere (you know who I am talking about) and they said the situation was interesting although they would prefer being in the thick of things themselves or the driving seat, which for the record is not happening. They were however onto the case of another in a big way, which out of respect will not say here, but if you are clever you can find quite easily. Clue: what did I say recently? LOL

OK now hoping this one is an RTO obviously for more impact and would like to add to the position if there is still time.

As said the closing price is key here and it needs to be close to opening price for the continuation of the upwards channel. PROPS saying that the ask price being at full does indicate that they may be filling an order.

Correction: The 493m IS with the nominees included.

Relax. The closing price tonight will be the same as the opening price. The drop is down to removing stale holders before the next leg upwards. Position taken.

If I am correct there is only 1.1bn approx of stock available, of which (not including nominees) there is only 493m freefloat. So imagine if news breaks what kind of scramble for stock there will be. So go back to my first point, can you see now why they have dipped the price from 0.38-0.40 tops, to 0.23-0.27p in a matter of days? Its clear out the weak. I only hope some who are getting tested can hold through short term pain.

Applegarth
To be fair NMS1966 was adding to your fun, while your own comments sounded like someone who has too much time on their hands. 21,550 posts even if the average thinking time and posting were taken into account you can see how much of your life has been dedicated to the BB. I have gone through NMS's old posts and there does show there has been contribution.

There is a lot going on behind the scenes but it would be wasted on this BB in the midst of the posts you put up. It was only that I put my head around the corner and was surprised at your comment. Normally don't like filtering people but in this case its the right course of action. Hope you are able to make on this like everyone else.

Then do the sensible thing mate.

This is not a mess about. It's a real offer.

Stimpy
Decent RNS this morning. If you feel uncomfortable holding them I can make you an offer. The nominal value for each shares I believe is 0.0001p? I can give you 0.00005p if you or anyone wishes to 'end their misery'

So if you would wish to sell 2m that can raise £100 and say 20m a £1000. The offer is open to anyone from 'interested' parties one being me.

Madchatter
Same question to you as I gave Neilin. Have you ever spoken to Antos?

yes they are a struggling company so you are not wrong and have been for a few years. Best to stay on subject, teek eh?

Hence why I have been chucked out of so many casinos, and by the looks of it hopefully another one hopefully tomorrow!

ValiRx
London, UK, 1 April 2020: ValiRx Plc (AIM: VAL), a clinical stage biotechnology company, announces:

-- that it has conditionally raised GBP200,000 of gross proceeds through the issue of 5,714,288* new ordinary shares (post reorganisation) at a post reorganisation price of 3.5 pence* per share ("Placing Shares") with new investors ("Conditional Placing"). The Conditional Placing is conditional, inter alia, of the passing of resolution 1 (share capital reorganisation) as set out in the circular posted to shareholders dated 6 March 2020 convening a meeting on 25 March 2020 ("Capital Reorganisation General Meeting"). The Capital Reorganisation General Meeting was adjourned on 25 March 2020;

-- the appointment of Peterhouse Capital Limited ("Peterhouse") as sole broker to the Company; and

-- the proposed appointment of Martin Lampshire as a Non-executive Director.