RE: Dilution.6 Feb 2025 18:42
Another opportunity to top up at bargain prices for which perhaps I can thank the negative sentiment. The interview reinforced my view that this was an accretive deal and if I chose not to add to my early morning post, I'll claim under oath that I had said all I had to say, and was happy for the market to throw a hissy fit for a short while. To reiterate what I said, this deal has such a short payback period that it really a no-brainer and we should be more angry if the company had failed to secured the higher grade material (including future options). I failed to take account of costs and taxes but I still would argue we are looking at 2-3mths payback for 6 months worth of material.
More generally, I feel this message Board has a tendency to "micro-manage" the company, seeking all sorts of information and fretting that the lack of information was likely to mean bad news. That may be down to personal experience and I don't disregard market sentiment. But I would argue this approach is not in the interest of the company or its shareholders. As shareholders we have to rely on executive management to do that and on the BoD to act in our interests. Running commentary on operations is a diversion of management time and Leon, to his credit, has resisted calls for monthly production updates. If that fail to do that, this is simply a risk that shareholders have to bear and we get to have our say when voting on Board resolutions. Those that don't trust management, shouldn't be invested here.