RE: Antigen vs Anyibody18 Apr 2020 11:43
What if the poticians are not lying and they were following what they keep on saying was "the best medical and scientific advice" and when that advice changed they changed the process? It's the advisors that got it wrong not the politicians, as they know they are not experts in this field. Frankly, based on previous coronavirus spreads and there are a lot, many of them benign for a fatality point of view, it wasn't a given that this was going to be different from a developing herd immunity point of view so the advice was based on assumption as not a lot was known about it...and still isn't.
What if they ordered a lockdown before and outbreak and it didn't occur anywhere else? You would still be calling them a bunch of muppets. Not saying they are not numpties just pointing out they can't win when you judge them in hindsight.
At the time I was quite happy they put measures in place that stopped a lot of companies from just making all their staff redundant before lockdown as it took away a lot of uncertainty and will have saved many people from very serious hardship. By the way the NHS has not collapsed, unlike the services in Italy and Spain, they have so far achieved their main stated objective. There are a number of ways that a collapse might have happened and may still occur.
Too many cases at once for the capacity that people die without getting the care they need. Capacity is ICU beds, ventilators, oxygen and plenty of others.
Falling numbers of staff where it becomes impossible to treat the all sick even if there is physical capacity. That is caused by bad luck, poor PPE supply and not repurposing staff from not urgent areas and not asking people to come back. I'm involved in the last point with inviting people recently left the profession to return for one big push as I work for a healthcare regulator.
So I'm only going to criticise the government and their advisors without hindsight and that is for their inability to recognise the need to ramp up to reliable mass continuous testing at the onset in the UK as it was clear from other countries by that point that the only way you are going to defeat this outbreak is with good data and you don't get that with a damp finger in the air. That's not hindsight it was said at the start. They are still not doing it. Even the promised and expected 100,000 tests a day are still lab based. They need to create mobile labs so they can take testing to communities. Testing is only quick if you can put the swabs in the machines at the point of swabbing. If you need to send them to a lab and then distibute the results instead of <2 hours it's likely >>24 hours by which time if you've rolled back lockdown. The people that go on to develop symptoms are already spreading before you know. It's just not good enough to continue only with a lab based strategy. Get the testing machines into vans or trailers and get them to the communities starting with care homes.