Member Info for Bamps21

Southern comfort

You are as vindictive as your other moniker 007.

A real nasty piece of work

Ten years must be looked at as a minimum.

The SLC to the vertical stockwork corridor could be that alone.

Why would Ggp build a third train to process others ores, the tolling charges would need to be sky high to cover the cost.

Twenty million ton per year is a big plant , to get that tonnage to the plant is a big ask. The maximum has been stated can be stretched to 23mt if needed but that would put a strain on maintenance.

Other optimisations are needed to reduce waste rock entering the plant, additional sorters for one at Havieron prior to transport.

Other mines would have to follow suit.

I know Grace is Goldworms favourite. Paterson Resources have been struggling recently can they afford to bring Grace forward, maybe they can but would be a good fit with the other SE hub targets for Ggp and the nearby Pascalle

Most interesting bit in my opinion

“ the large Eastern Stockworks”

They are drilling this at the moment.

Situated between reefs M30 and M40 so will take in some of the narrow reefs in between.

Best bit on the presentation

“Multi year life SLC operation “ referring to the Vertical stockwork corridor.

This is hopefully what to expect under and possibly above the West Dome Deeps as well.

20-30 years 🤷‍♂️

I spent 6 months researching this share before I put a penny in.

It’s obvious you’ve done nothing but taken a gamble.

How dare you come on here berating one of the nicest people on this board, she is a wonderful person .

You should apologise

Hi SAB

Looks like there’s a lot more to come there with 3 other adjoining zones of potential.

The MRE news has been forgotten already lost in the fog of waffle and promoting other stocks.

500,000oz in the 15 month mine plan increased to 3.1moz.

That’s a 2.6moz increase where’s that come from well it certainly didn’t come from the Main Dome that’s shown blank. It certainly didn’t come from the Mreefs that was taken out of the MRE. It certainly didn’t come from the WDD. It certainly didn’t come from the outlying targets they’re still not been put back in yet.

It’s come from the West Dome open pit Stage 7 and Stage 8 extension.

The consultants report in the admissions document gave a low value of 300,000 oz to a high of 600,000oz in those 2 zones and including Stage 9 in the Main Dome.

Well Stage 9 has not been included this time.

We have nearly 300% more ore from the West Dome pit than when we bought it.

To put that in context that’s MORE than Minyari.

Bring on Stage 9 🚀

Drill season starts from April, so I was surprised they were drilling the open pit in February

I did include a target called Backdoor in my quiz yesterday. It’s likely to be the first target outside of the 2 main mines.

It’s close to the surface and grades are quite high and open at depth. Not a big target but a quick open pit and room for potential expansion.

Camp Dome being a copper blanket under 75m of cover could be rife for insitu extraction method. Could be fairly quick to establish.

O’Callaghans is under 300m of cover and planned to be long hole open stopes and then backfilled.

Hi Havetelfer

That would be a nice problem to have, I can’t see it happening even with Minyari and Havieron that’s only half to two thirds of one train for one year.

Shaun stated they could increase the trains to 11.5mt.

He also mentioned not wanting to truck from Telfer for 20 years , they would need some other means( the PFS gives 4 options) and some sort of plant at Havieron could be looked at. A full plant I believe the government wouldn’t want that with Australias third largest plant close by.

Sending less waste rock would help the trucking so a primary crusher(which is certainty) and an ore sorter would help but the ball mills need to be by the plant. A fresh grinding face on the ore grains helps the acids react with it and release the minerals, an old doesn’t work so well.

Hi TT

Thanks for finding that.

This is what they said about the WDD core in the RNS

“Additionally, drilling has intercepted several broad zones of stockwork mineralisation within the core of the anticlinal hinge. These zones are interpreted to be similar in style to the large stockwork systems that formed part of the mineralisation targeted by the sub-level cave at the Main Dome Underground. Since these zones were not the primary focus of the initial drilling phase, they will be targeted in future drilling programs. ”

“Significant down hole intercepts within these zones include:

§ WUC4550019 with 42.0m @ 1.97 g/t Au & 0.49% Cu (2.56 g/t AuEq) from 294.0m

§ WUC4550020 with 18.4m @ 3.93 g/t Au & 0.92% Cu (5.03 g/t AuEq) from 330.6m

§ WUC4550023 with 36.1m @ 2.14 g/t Au & 0.21% Cu (2.39 g/t AuEq) from 365.9m

§ WUC4550022 with 31.7m @ 1.34 g/t Au & 0.35% Cu (1.76 g/t AuEq) from 366.0m

§ WUC4550030 with 23.3m @ 1.64 g/t Au & 0.54% Cu (2.39 g/t AuEq) from 341.0m

The SCP is too far in the future for 9mt, I would forget about it for now.

The stoping plan shown in the admissions document picks out in different colours the schedule. To get that 2.78mt per year needs careful planning and at least 1,000m depth to maintain that sum. Any SLC can’t start till it is backfilled apart from underside of the Dyke that could start after the first 4 fronts are nearly backfilled over 10 years away.

When you look at the trucking from Havieron they’ve quoted 40 truck movements per day without mentioning what size.

I believe they will use the 3 bed Volvos which carry about 125 tons. Put that in perspective our trucks here are restricted to 25 tons

40 x 125 x 365 =1,825,000 tons per year

Some use 3.5 bed trucks so that’s about 150 ton and the biggest 5 bed 225 tons

40 x 225 x 365 =3,285,000

We would need monster trucks to get the 2.78m tons per year to Telfer.

That would only utilise 3 to 4 months of 1 train per year.

The WDD could fill one train

When the Havieron crescent was first discovered it was looked on as an anticline tipped up on its end with the core being full of breccia. Of course this proved not to be the case.

Describing the WDD it definitely is an anticline with a mineralised strata ( the LLU) wrapped over the top of it.

My point of my quiz yesterday and my presentation was to show that the core of the WDD anticline has similar grades of ore as some of the Havieron sulphides and it’s breccia.

Therefore the WDD has similar characteristics as the crescent with similar grades. It is nearly horizontal all within 3km radius of the shaft. There’s no dyke causing issues. It has a vertical fault with a fluid pathway running through it. It’s all within hard rock no slushy mess to get through.

The WDD is slightly further ahead in first production terms but way behind in exploration terms. By that I mean the modelling and mine planning are in place, the underground crusher is already there, the route out to the ROM pad is in place, but the orebody is still open downwards, to the north,south and west. That means there’s a lot more to define.

In the WDD RNS it states they will be drill planning the next round to get more knowledge of the core and describes it as a mirror image of the Main Dome.

This indicates there could be more ore above this WDD where in the Main Dome they removed it by an SLC operation .

Havieron hasn’t got this luxury of a big area to SLC it’s all stoping and backfilling to leave the surface and aquifers intact.

The WDD looks like our second Havieron in my opinion .

Please look in the forward projection bar chart in the admissions document it gives you the ramp up details for the coming years.

Full production has been stated for 2028 for sometime now, without full production the processing of ore will be very intermittent.

It’s in writing not verbal.

Bertiesboy it is in the project timescales if you care to look for it

The Havieron production hasn’t been set back at all there was always going to be a build up to full production in 2028.

If you care to read the admissions document it itemises the future years of production with full production from 2028/29. There was always going to be a small build up of production.

The stoping procedure states it needs 4 vertical fronts to work on for production of 2.8mt per year. That requires a decline depth of 750m at least from the top of the ore, that’s over 5,000m in length, plus the drives to the ore face. This probably will not be complete until 2029/30 with production starting at the top while the infrastructure goes lower.

The fifth, sixth and seventh fronts will all need to be complete prior to commencing due to its narrowing deepening nature.

More than 3mt is going to be hard to achieve in this sharply narrowing orebody.

Well if you want more costs, less profits & more debt then carry on and be negative