RE: BT13 Oct 2018 13:47
Trouble is without considering debt, pension deficit, falling revenue and the aggressive competition who don’t have these costs....... interference from the regulator and the investment needed for BT to get where it needs to get to, opinions on how the management or what should happen to the pension are just low level opinions. It’s quite as bad as opinionated views of the flatness of the earth, but it isn’t far off. Based on all these things & whether the board has done a bad job, or the best job possible considering these things or somewhere inbeteeen and finally the equivalent other companies offer today, then my opinion is BT needs to try and reorganise their pension liability. So long as they honour up to to the point where the people have already paid in. As difficult as it is & ive already been there, I don’t think any company should compromise itself trying to deliver pension policies made in a changing world before they knew how it would change. Shouting about worker entitlement and things like that don’t work, because BT doesn’t solely exist for the benefit of its workers, at this point I think sometimes there is some confusion on here. Some companies are bad, some are good & from what I see BT is actually better than most & there’s always an alternative. Course I understand employees want what’s best for them, it’s not reasonable to expect a company to do what’s best for it..... & of course it is it’s money and profit. All of this is of course only my opinion, utterly worthless that it is, because of it I back it and want the RPI tonCPI change because I view it as reasonable. If I thought BT was going too far, my opinion would change, but would be equally pointless as an opinion.