Member Info for Apre

FFS, what is the matter with you eejits?

There will be no 'addressing of any mysteries', Mr Helmet. There will be no one on the BOD who, having read the slippery semantics and contrived conspiracies in posts written on a free to access social media BB, by a damaged and desperate sociopath, Mr Eggy . . . feels compelled to respond to said misfit by clearing the air with a "let's all hold hands and get this sadness off our chests"-style heeling ceremony . . .

Smart, high-achieving, focussed business people to do not wash their dirty laundry in public. And personally, as this is my company too, I don't want to see it out there either. As disappointed as we all may feel about the Dr Smith story, I think to give it more oxygen would be detrimental to the company and the SP. (No, I am not hiding my head in the sand I am advocating damage limitation.)

Anyone who thinks there is any benefit to be had from public self-flagellation by the BOD is a thick fecker (Mr Helmet) and/or a twisted, attention seeking, malicious manipulator (Mr Eggy).

Ice, for them (it) it is not about the accuracy or validity of their content. They don't care about that. They post simply to disrupt, antagonise and seek attention. They are Trolls. It's what they do.

Genuinely . . . an odd mix of multiple personality disorders makes them immune to logical argument and any embarrassment at what they write. Whilst we are trying to tell them they are wrong or taking the Mickey out of them, they are laughing out loud at their own genius. It's what Trolls do.

Ice, . . . Oz is Thorn is Eggy . . . (and others?)

EggyOz, while "@avacta team is knocking it out of the park ", I guess you are, as usual, knocking one out in the park.

Play to your strengths, eh?

Victory12, . . . well done, a victory for stupidity over ignorance.

Derek,

In many of your posts you allude to a very long life of, variously, having a science degree, having a successful career, working as a consultant, being a very successful private investor and being comfortably retired (for 20 years?), living a full life of relative financial security . . . all befitting a successful, accomplished and psychologically secure man of the world.

Why is it then that you post in the style of a needy adolescent, desperately trying to assert some kind of relevance to a peer group to which you will never belong, making references to science that you clearly do not understand, offering opinions on the running a company upon which you clearly lack sufficient knowledge to support and constantly switching your stance from an investor who expects to do well out of Avacta, to one who has an illogical, over-emotional, ill-considered, under-researched, ultra-negative view of its prospects?

So, . . . respond to the question(s) being asked (not to the one you wish you had been asked, as you normally do) or put your dimwitted tail between your hare-brained butt cheeks, and do us all favour and find another BB on which to make a clown of yourself.

Or, . . . dismiss this post as 'potty-mouthed abuse' and carry on as usual making a complete and utter embarrassing a-hole of yourself.

Oh! . . . and try not to mention pompoms in your reply . . . its a bit creepy.

" . . . my daily reads are now weekly."

Any chance you could push that out to monthly? It will give you time to think about how you explain, ". . . finance for 10 months".

Oh, and it will alleviate the amount of "crap on these boards" which you seem unhappy about.

Thanks.

I guess there must be a perceived advantage over the previous ones. But that may be simply the opinion of the BOD, or personal contact . . . etc, possibly an issue with the previous ones . . .

If I had to guess, and given ABDX'x tendency towards tight lipped, strategic planning . . . I would suggest that the BOD perceive the new broker to be more suited, better networked etc for the next phase of ABDX's development.

They wouldn't change for no reason. Perhaps it will become clear in time.

Sorry if that is a bit waffly, I am clutching at straws.

TBH, I am not really in a position to judge the pros and cons of different brokers. Anyone any views on these new guys?

Good assessment there Muck. Here, here.

Onwards and upwards.

Oooh, . . . proper sore loser.

Night.

"I'm interested in discussing the company if that's ok."

But you are not. That is my issue. You are mostly interested in making stand off, verbal attacks on the CEO and BOD. That just adds to the negativity and we have more than enough of that already.

Vent your spleen to the CEO/BOD directly. Don't just showboat on an anonymous social media platform.

Seriously PL . . . you are not the poster you used to be. Trying to goad me into commenting on your agenda will not change that. (And in any case, you cannot manipulate me.) I go back to my original point . . .stop being a big mouth and return to being an astute, analytical, humorous poster.

That's your lot. I'm off to bed.

Oh BTW, I'm guessing you didn't find any pom pom posts in my history.

Not much of a broadside but I'll work with it as best I can . . .

"Not interested Apre. I'll voice my opinion. If you don't like it bin it. Same goes for you... If you're not capable of understanding that not everything smells of roses, so be it. Keep the pom poms flying high. I've always been critical of Alan and I'll continue to be.

"Not interested Apre." - But interested enough to reply.

"I'll voice my opinion. " - As is your right. But remember, there is a difference between a considered opinion and a spiteful rant.

"If you don't like it bin it." - I have never binned anyone. Nobody intimidates me enough for me to want to put my fingers in my ears and hide from them. Certainly not you.

"Same goes for you... If you're not capable of understanding that not everything smells of roses, so be it." - I am perfectly capable of assessing the current situation but I don't feel the need to showboat on an anonymous BB.

"Keep the pom poms flying high." Derek! you little monkey . . . you should be in bed. But seriously, go through my posting history and find a single "pom pom"-style post . . . go on . . . I'll wait.

"I've always been critical of Alan and I'll continue to be." - As is your right. But FFS grow a pair and write a direct,personal letter to the CEO rather than giving it large on an anonymous BB. Dozens of posters have done that, in some cases dozens of times. It's tired. It's old. It shows weakness. It is meaningless. Stop dropping FUD clouds on our BB and take up your gripe with the CEO.

Anything else?

NY, your 21.33hrs post is one of the best we have had on this BB for a while. Excellent synopsis.

PL, for the four years or so I have been reading your posts I have mostly found you smart, quick witted, capable of analysis, capable of foreseeing future scenarios etc, an all round worthwhile poster and source of entertainment.

Recently you have let yourself down. You do not have to take anything of any worth from what I say and I daresay you will 'rip me a new one' in your reply. But get a grip fella. Whatever it is that has transformed you into an over-opinionated, domineering, borish pr!ck with a peculiar fetish for the CEO . . . give your head a shake and realise that of the many factors that may contribute to the AVCT SP rising, they do not include slating the company strategy, the CEO, the BOD etc etc . . . that is all part of the problem, not the solution.

I repeat, you are now part of the problem.

Also, BTW, your opening comment in your 21.56hrs post "U ok hun?" was cheap, amateurish and a weak attempt to shut down a reply in advance. You demean yourself with such trash.

Sort yourself out. Put your dummy back in your over active gob and get back to being the PL that was listened to.

And if you genuinely feel you have a gripe, write directly to the CEO rather than be a BB hero,

Right . . . now give me your broadside . . .

I meant genuines not geniuses . . . auto correct . . . possibly actually correct this time.

Morning BITL, you're right, I know, I shouldn't do it . . .

I generally have clowns and charlatans like that on an 'ignore or ridicule' setting. Sometimes in a moment of weakness, I give in to the urge to take the Mickey. Rest assured I'll never engage meaningfully with them, just a post or two to ruffle their feathers then I bail. I may be a bit naughty but I'm not crazy.

That said, I have just seen one of our regular charlatans posting more FUD . . . I'm itching to respond . . . should I, shouldn't I? Ignore or ridicule? I'll flip a coin.

GL all the geniuses.

"Apre, try reading before making a tool of yourself."

Thanks for the advice. I have 'tried reading' your posting history . . . it's superb. Comedy 'Dictator' Gold.

Folks, allow me to introduce you to "elrico". You thought we had had every stripe of loony tune on this BB before but I am delighted to say, No! Not so.

It's time for an altogether new breed of loon. It can arrive out of the blue and with one single post, containing a random Xwitter tweet, it can wipe out years of research and comment by dozens of dedicated LTH posters on the AVCT board . . . and "educate" these misguided fools in the blinking of an eye.

We are honoured and humbled in equal measure. I think . . .

Or are we talking to a BOT?

Or just another care in the community misfit?

Go on, . . . educate me again . . . el pendejo.

Gje, always enjoyed your posts. Last few days you have been on top note. Tonight you have excelled. Well done, thank you.

A new FUDster arrives . . . unsubstantiated opinion/made up manipulation?

elrico ? . . . El pendejo.

Am I reading this right? Seems to me that in the last few days, some known FUD-wrangling trolls (and some care in the community sheep) have undergone some kind of St Paul-style conversion. Definite upward swing in the narrative.

Traders jumping ship? No! . . . say it ain't so . . .