Member Info for Alan2017

RealAnalyst - you have already stated you have no clue when it comes to investing in AIM shares and once you get your money back you will leave. You have also stated on Twitter and on this BB that you are suing Angus....what is the update with regards to what your lawyer says?!?! lol As I said...maybe thats why Angus are ignoring your emails lol You still can't smell the coffee even if I've written it as basic as possible......Perforating a well doesn't not 100% guarantee flow or even an increase in flow. It all depends on the reservoir properties (Porosity and more importantly permeability). If you drill a well in granite and perforate a well...do you think you will produce oil?!! Do you think if you drill below the oil / gas zone and perforate in the water zone.....will you produce hydrocarbons?!?!?! Of course not...are you following me now? Long sigh........ Angus were not perforating X2....simply inserting the ESP (I'm assuming they have done it this time as that was what they intimated went in the well back in November). Why they were working on X1...who knows as that was not in their scope of work (as mentioned in AGM report and RNS). Lidsey was always going to be for paying the salaries of the BOD / keeping the lights on.....nothing more. Lidsey is on the cusp of the Weald....which means its the poor cousin in relation to the other fields. Brockham and Balcombe are the game changers...these are the ones that will be the changers. Balcombe is supposedly the jam in the donut lol. 7-10 days of testing and we will all then have a better idea of where we stand before moving on to an extended flow test at Brockham. I reiterate.....both wells drilled and cased off. Just ready to unwrap and fire the perforation guns. Quite frankly with your unbalanced posts and history (posting your email address on this board was a red flag) I'm not sure you really should be posting on here as you do take the corrections to your posts quite badly. I actually have to keep checking you're not my wife playing a trick on me by being logged in on another phone......I thought she was bad at complaining lol. PS - Any news on Charlie?

ESPs don’t improve flows....they stabilise them for reservoir longevity and to prevent the reservoir being damaged. The work at Lidsey was standard workover operations and quite frankly nothing to get excited about as it’s a routine operation. Balcombe and Brockham are the ones which will get the SP rising ....hopefully. I’m sorry, but the likes of RealAnalyst and other posters harping on about vast increases in flow rates at Lidsey has just applied unnecessary pressure to the usual posts on this board....or perhaps that was his intention?

Oil prices might remain higher than expected if the 3 countries block Saudi efforts to produce more. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-06-17/iran-says-three-opec-members-to-veto-saudi-proposed-supply-boost

FortKnox - that would be something to discuss on the UKOG board.....

JA51 - why are you trying to twist itsallaboutmes’ words?!?! I see you’re playing your usually games. As itsallaboutme states there should be a SP boost when we start the Balcombe flow test. You just have to look at how UKOG SP increased when they started drilling Broadford Bridge on 30th May 2017 1.08p on 28th May 2017 8.40p on 3rd September 2017 Now that’s a healthy climb wouldn’t you agree for a site that doesn’t have a production licence? Balcombe has already been drilled and cased off...it’s just sitting there ready to be tested....it’s like Christmas time and all you have to do is unwrap your present lol Even if it takes 2 years to achieve a production licence ...the SP will reflect what I hope is great flow rates. Then onwards and upwards to Brockham ...which has also. Web drilled and cases off...no UKOG headaches here fortunately. Extended flow test results will certainly boost the SP. It’s certainly taken far too long to be getting in to this situation...but in a short period of time we should multiple RNS / positive news release which will certainly send the SP North...bank to where it was towards the end of last year...wouldn’t that be lovely lol.

Realanalyst - maybe Angus are not replying to you because you’re still suing them?!!! Lol

Pdub - I don’t think the Angus board is the right place to be promoting another share you hold, one that certainly has no connection with Angus and to slip in how it’s made you a lot of money...well isn’t that ironic lol To play the green card when certainly with your qualification you should know it isn’t as green as it was made out. Fortunately for your investment it’s in places like China and South Africa where safety standards are very slack compared to UK. Looking back at my comment saying I’m glad it’s made you a lot of money ...I realise it comes across as patronising.

I just think folk are applying unnecessary expectations on flow rates. The work carried out at Lidsey is to maximise the long term productivity of the field...rather than giving it a bopd boost. As other posters have said ...getting the nod for Brockham and Balcombe will ...hopefully...be the SP boost that UKOG just witnessed. It would be nice to have a steady increase as we saw last year from 9p through to mid 30’s. I hope Angus have used this downtime wisely to plan every step of each operation, looking at it from various angles for all eventualities....such as critical stocks, what if contingency scenarios,

Pdub - as a Geologist you should know where it comes from...and therefore the process of extracting it from its raw state to the finished product. But as you said..people are entitled to ask questions. I merely pointed out the not so green process of getting it to the finished product and how the 2 sites compare with a photo. Your post without a prior knowledge of this process did not fully explain this and could be inferred as a 100% green product. “We should all be concerned about air pollution, climate change, plastics in the environment, etc. In my opinion only a fool would not be. I am heavily invested in BMN which is producing vanadium that in the future I hope will be more and more used in Vanadium Redox Flow Batteries for grid scale energy storage, allowing storage of energy produced from solar and wind farms. And happily making a lot of money from that investment.” Ps - delighted you are making a lot of money from it lol

Pdub - the word Geologist in the oil industry is a bad word, as they can’t make a decision even if there is only one answer lol I guess UKOG investors are finding that out with SS I would never dare...I just would if required.

DaveOx - it was the inference of being green, name dropping another share and associating a product that requires smelting, acidisastion and deep open cast mining before being used with renewable energy that made me chuckle. I certainly agree with the world drowning in plastic, but as a general point I do raise my eyebrows at folk who don’t fully appreciate where a product comes from....it’s all about the PR I guess lol

Pdub - do you know where Vanadium comes from as well as scarring the earth? From crude oil lol “Vanadium is present in crude oil in the Caribbean basin, parts of the Middle East and Russia, as well as in tar sands in western Canada. Coal in parts of China and the USA contains vanadium. During the refining or burning of these energy sources a vanadium bearing ash, ****, spent catalyst or residue is generated which can be processed for vanadium recovery.” http://vanitec.org/vanadium/making-vanadium Doesn’t read very green to me.....plus how is it transported?

Pdub - you are quite correct that Angus need to do far more when it comes to PR as sadly all the great videos / presentations they did early 2017 have been forgotten. Oil is a dirty word and lithium is the eco friendly word....but how is each extracted? It does make me chuckle when folk say they are being environmentally friendly ...yet this presenration shows a different aspect https://goo.gl/images/vrjpia I’m sure the NIMBYS would be up in arms if a lithium / vanadium mine was proposed in their ward.

The Site Manager will look after the site all year round coordinating the tanker shipments, daily / weekly / monthly service checks on wellhead and comply with HSE requirements. These guys have a non oil background. Companyman (X2 for 24 hour ops) are specifically involved with everything from rigging up equipment, drilling, running and cementing casing, completions, stimulation, workovers,..basically everything involved from the rig equipment first arriving to having all the infrastructure in the well set and tested before handing the keys to production to start producing ...in this case the Site Manager ...on a larger offshore scale he would be called the OIM.

Competent rig personnel is certainly an advantage, but it’s the Angus Companymen who will make or break the operation. Are they hands on experienced guys or are they the type who sit in the office and watch a screen. How they coordinate the rig company with various service companies is critical to a successful job.

Ibug - can’t understand why somebody would continue to insist on their Twitter pages that the aviation pipeline would be used for HH.....the Exxonmobile website is written even for folk with zero experience.

bug - I was posting in total agreement with you.

Ibug - it's best to get the information from the horses mouth...I'm not talking about the meal for one bushman on Twitter, but from the Exxonmobil website https://www.slpproject.co.uk There are numerous references to the pipeline being used solely for Aviation purposes "Since the 1980s it has been used to supply aviation fuel to some of the UK’s busiest airports. We are now looking to update this key piece of infrastructure to maintain supply of aviation fuel for years to come." https://www.slpproject.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/operating-the-pipeline-after-consultation.mp4?_=2 The application to build a new aviation pipeline and grout the old one is not due until 2019 with construction taking place in 2021. https://www.slpproject.co.uk/project-timeline/

Pboo - you are truly special. I love how you have taken my posts and then replied to me as if its your own thoughts lol Almost like your Twitter page (@Wealdoilers) posting a screenshot of one of your posts from this board (as Pboo) stating this a a post from Angus LSE board......unbiased reporting?!?! haha Your memory is fading...perhaps you're one of those folks with multiple accounts....seems strange members TrueOil and Donkeywork both came on here to defend you and both members have been banned by Admin. How do you explain that? You do realise what you just said involves requiring a rig as there is no tubing in the ground with your theory....I'm not knocking your posts...I'm correcting them so others do not get misinformed by somebody who has zero experience in the oil industry. I can correct you and give you informative information such as ESPs will not boost for rates as you and RealAnalyst have been stating both on here and on Twitter. But you refuse to acknowledge that....is that a personal issue stemming from something quite frankly this board should not know about or are you one of these Flat Earth folk who refuse to believe the Earth is round lol Pboo....17th March 2018....on this board as Pboo (just to help you lol) you posted "Alan, your just like a little child who can't get his own way. I think I will filter you as your contribution just lately is very poor. You can't even answer a simple question without making some thing out of it."

gmed - sadly Pboo should have filtered me a long time ago (this is from Pboo himself), but for seem reason...well lets be honest, who else is going to give him technical oilfield analysis from someone who has actually walked inside the gates of an oil site. It would be best addressing him and asking why he hasn't filtered me.....seems some of you are fed up with him?