Member Info for Alan2017

Pboo - I'm referring to your posts on Angus LSE board this morning....my responses are still here....yours posts with factually incorrect posts are not. Try to keep up.

Your statement Why should I want to use "Oil Field Terms”…….loooong sigh, head in hands.

An old sea dog were you ;)

Strange how Pbbos posts with totally inaccurate oilfield terms / rig ups have suddenly disappeared?!?! Is he trying to hide the evidence?

Ibug - Its spelt Chicksan in the oilfield.....and chiksan in Marine industry.

Pboo - there is no such thing as a slick line unit. You should be employed by UKOG as you can dig a hole deeper and quicker than they can lol.

Now I do hope you are sat down and comfortable......time for Lesson #69 for you. Slickline, E-line or wireline tools that go in the ground are called BHA's (just like the big boys drilling). There is no standard of tool string as it is all dependent on the Clients wish for specific information. What was run was most likely (as you guys still can't invest in a decent camera) was flow / temperature gauges which will be left in the well doing the specific test before relieved to download the memory data.

You can't even tell the difference between drill pipe and casing / liner / tubing. ThatsDrilling 101....and you failed it I'm afraid lol. It takes a special person not thin you can rig up surface test equipment with 10m length tubing / liner?!?! Just picture how you would position equipment within that site if all you had were 10m lengths?!? Quite a shocking mistake.

And lastly....have you noticed how you ask me questions and I never need to ask you....thats because only one of us has even made it through the gates of a rig site lol

FortKnox - I think you're being very presumptuous assuming everyone has an Apple...South Korea make some fine phones and probably the TV you're watching re-runs of Dallas on.

Chinese Tourist Quality photos means....they take photo of everything except the subject itself. Hence the comment considering 2 men peeping through bushes can/t get a decent photo. Why don't they just buy a digital camera with a zoom on it? lol

I note you are easily offended, so please do write to the Chinese Government and ask why some of their citizens feel it is acceptable to photograph the Grenfell Tower block?

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/outrage-bus-load-chinese-tourists-11258852

Pboo - oh dear man.....it's very easy to tell one end of a perf gun from the other as one has a pin connection and the other end has a box connection....how else would you screw them together? Only a non expert would ask such a ridiculous question.

You have filled up this BB with multiple posts due to a combination of your ego and ramping of Angus with unrealistic flow rates and this seemingly insider knowledge of them testing the Kimmeridge when it was never mentioned anywhere? How did you come by that information? Been talking to Tidswell?

I do note that the same day you sold out of Angus you posted / retweeted 3 posts which were highly negative about the Angus board, but yet Wealdoilers (which is your Twitter page) has never criticised SS or having 3 placings in 1 month. How very strange.

If you had ever worked in the oil industry...or even anything engineering related you would appreciate how your posts regarding the pipes being used to connect surface testing equipment together was cringingly wrong. Do you know what footprint you would need to connect 2 pieces of equipment together when the casing / tubing are 10m long?!?! Have you tried just screwing 2 joints together in a horizontal position let alone torque them up to make them sealed tight.? Its nigh on impossible without pipe laying equipment. The pipe was (well not for you obviously) to be used downhole. Do you know what a 1502 chicksan pipe is?

https://twitter.com/WealdOilers/status/1011516286558507008

I couldn't care less if you don't post updates with Chinese Tourist quality photos as since you have sold out of Angus, you have still posted on here criticising the BOD of a company you have no investment in. Some folk would say you are trying to get Angus PIs to jump ship to UKOG, which you have a holding in.

That should read 1000'sbopd ...and not just 1,000bopd.

Neon / Baits - you would need to drill a sidetrack as the Kimmerdige is in the build section of the well...meaning productivity wise it will be very low as its not horizontal through the Kimmeridge.

Spending all that money on plugging back a reservoir to carry out a sidetrack and drill a horizontal well through the Kimmeridge at Lidsey is for me very distracting, a financial hit for chicken feed.

We have spent lot of money on Hollywood (which is still unresolved after 9 years in total), Balcombe which I would have preferred not to have acquired at such a juvenile stage of the company (but now we have it).

The 2 big hitters which should produce 1,000bopd are very close to be flow tested. We need to learn to walk before we run....as I said in 2016....there are many Shale Fracking companies who spent money buying up more acreage believing the good times wouldn't end...but they did, and most are not around anymore even though the oil is still in the ground....then the majors moved in and picked up the assets from the banks for peanuts. UKOG is following that model.

Neon - great to hear there is moveable oil at Lidsey, but it has always been billed as the Field for paying the bills and seeing the BOD supplied with champagne.

Lidsey is on the outer edge of the Weald.....it's Balcombe and Brockham that folk need to focus on as its more centrally located.

Balcombes' Kimmeridge play is 25% thicker than at HH which flowed circa 1,600bopd during the first flow test. Balcombe is in the sweet spot of the Weald.

Brockham has a production licence. Both wells have been drilled, cased off and are ready for a 7 day flow test at Balcmobe prior to an extended flow test at Brockham. These are the company makers.....where the SP realistically should be going much higher than the 36p we saw end of 2016.

That is the prize investors should be focussed on.

Charlie - Tidswell is not fit to be the CEO...guilty by association whether it was incompetency or fraudulent. The Angus brand has been damaged....I repeat the brand, as the product (Balcombe / Brockham) is ready to launch the SP much higher. A change is required...what will our JV partners be thinking? This affects them as well.

He should be removed from the BOD, as well as stepping down as CEO. There are many PIs here who have more shares than him.

In my book these guys were overpaid considering the share stocks they had amassed for next to nothing.

As for replacements.....there are many folk out there who can run a small onshore UK oil company. We are not reinventing the wheel.

Charlie - He gets paid a salary of £120,000 a year....so he is not doing it for charity.

Tidswell pay doubles if certain flow targets are met.

He borrowed £200,000 from Angus and the debt now stands at £207,000 as per the AGM end of year documents.

Drilling an oil well and brining it online is not rocket science......so there are many many better qualified persons than Mr. Tidswell. Who says he is respected?

Tidswell is only the CEO and member of the BOD because he is (or was) a major shareholder in the company. You will not find this anywhere else in a respected oil company...especially a PLC to boot.

It has been quite obvious that we have needed a Captain i.e. new CEO since the 16th Nov 2016 RNS debacle....clashes with SCC and not having critical equipment on shelves (downhole pump) has meant the SP of Angus has stagnated / crashed rather than gone higher than mid 30's. It happened on his watch and sadly he is the only one to blame for this.

Time for a new CEO, re-evaluate the strategic targets, bring in competent persons to oversea the well tests at Balcombe / Brockham (Angus should be paying for a consultant with industry experience to be their Well Testing Supervisor who has been there, done that....knows eery step of the way and most importantly knows what to do if things go wrong...rather than leave it in the hands of a Service Company Engineer who most likely will screw it up)

Pboo - seeing you've sold out of Angus..why are you commenting on this board? Shouldn't you be more concerned abut UKOG having 3 placings in 1 month?!?!?! You don't seem to have posted a lot if anything on it?

Now UKOG having how many Billions of shares in circulation now....no production...screwed up BB twice and will need to do a sidetrack.....2 years until production can start after application is sent to OGA ......so how are you going to fund the next 2 years.......that would be good to post on your WealdOilers Twitter ramp page ....if you haven't blocked everybody by now lol

FortKnox - firstly please re-read what I wrote...its very obvious...even for the likes of you who I also mentioned in it. You have been nothing but anti Angus in your posts from Day 1.....so why does it surprise me to find you are so vocal right now. Just to inform you I don't expect a response from you as I won't reply.

".....trying to work out how Tidswell didn't screw himself out of this deal and is presently on a Caribbean Island laughing at us all.......or reading all the Trolls / Shorters posts."

Perhaps you are just naive when it comes to how money is lost or moved as part of a laundromat scam.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/mar/20/how-dirty-money-from-russia-flooded-into-the-uk-and-where-it-went

Wow....Not sure what is more painful...trying to work out how Tidswell didn't screw himself out of this deal and is presently on a Caribbean Island laughing at us all.......or reading all the Trolls / Shorters posts.

Amazing what rubbish gets blown into the yard when the wind direction changes. Sensible PI's will know to either filter or report these rather unsavoury folk.

This has all the same atmosphere as JOG where they announced the well was a duster.....PIs panicking...then Big Brother Statoil told the JOG BOD...we are drilling a sidetrack and as per JV...you will pay your share.....guess what ......they had a gusher and the SP rocketed.

Wouldn't it be nice after all these self inflicted headaches that we get good news on Balcombe / Brockham flow tests. I think July could be quite the roller coaster.

Well well well...after shaking my head for a long time.....if Tidswell got greedy then he deserves what he gets. Mystified why he would do such a thing in the first place?!?!

Its a real shame as the potential and hopefully imminent flow testing of Balcombe and Brockham will add a big nitro boost to the SP.

Angus would be wise to release another..more positive RNS to appease their PIs.

Shinfalls - Brockham side track is already drilled...just needs to have an extended flow test.

Moneymaker - supposed to be straight after to reduce mobilisation / demobilisation costs, as well as there being a lack of onshore well test packages. Look at my previous posts titled Balcombe. I posted a link for a Vonk interview and he explains it in there.

Balcombe 2 was a vertical exploratory well drilled to garner geological / petroleum information prior to being plugged pack and a sidetrack initiated which became Well Balcombe 2z which we will be testing soon (I hope lol).

More information regarding the flow test at Balcombe.

This document has the site plan of where it is in relation to the village of Balcombe as well as the test spread layout.

https://consult.environment-agency.gov.uk/psc/rh17-6jh-cuadrilla-balcombe-limited-epr-ab3307xd/supporting_documents/Non%20Tech%20Sum%20%20Revised%20v1.2.pdf

Other documents posted on there:

https://consult.environment-agency.gov.uk/psc/rh17-6jh-cuadrilla-balcombe-limited-epr-ab3307xd/

Photo of Balcombe 2 and 2z being drilled (note how secluded it is):

https://keithpp.files.wordpress.com/2013/08/sussex-countryside.jpg

https://keithpp.files.wordpress.com/2013/08/cuadrilla-site-at-balcombe.jpg

If you click on the first blue link titled Introduction - Inversion Structures...it will take you to Balcombe information and even show you photos of the site / surrounding area.The geological information is not fully up to date and does hypothesis what Cuadrillas intentions are...without knowing the facts.

http://www.southampton.ac.uk/~imw/Petroleum-Geology-Weald-Shale.htm#PGSB-6-1

The great thing about Balcombe and Brockham is that both wells have been drilled and cased off. All that is required is for the wells to be perforated and then flow testing can commence. We won't have any potential headaches that UKOG had at BB due to not drilling the well correctly.

Balcombe is a quick 7-10day flow test operation
Brockham which will happen after Balcombe is an extended flow test, before crucially...turning the tap on.

We saw how the SP moved on the initial flow test at HH and again in the past week as they have geared up to commence a long term flow test.

Exciting times for all Weald Players.

Collated some Balcombe information from Podcasts, RNS and Websites

At 5min 20secs

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rvw9ikPZma0

Vonks said “ If you go to the North, Horse Hill flowed about 1,200bopd in aggregated from 2 limestones in the Kimmeridge, but its thinning out to the North. If you go to the centre where Balcombe is, it is 50% thicker, it was depositioned at a deeper depth, the maturity is better, so the conditions to make are better, so Horse Hill it was great; at Balcombe it should be much better

Now Vonk says Balcombe is 50% thicker than Horse Hill, but in Angus Jan 2108 presentation it states 25%.

This presentation is great to summarise Balcombe and also has graphics to compare Balcombe Kimmeridge with other Fields including Horse Hill.

http://www.angusenergy.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Balcombe-Presentation.pdf

At 1min 30secs

1min 30

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rvw9ikPZma0

Horizontal well drilled through best limestone in it thickest Kimmeridge layer in the centre of the Weald basin

Received planning permission to switch it on

Balcombe increased Angus Energy Energy by 3 times

Angus now Operator at Balcombe

http://www.angusenergy.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/OGA-Approves-Angus-Energy-For-Balcombe-Operatorship_21.May_.2018.pdf

On Cuadrilla website, various documents / applications posted.

https://cuadrillaresources.com/site/balcombe/