Member Info for 13thmonkey

We will not know as much as they do. I'm not aware of anything happening so no they haven't. The risk is decreasing the likelihood of increasing, until there is an offer there isn't one.

Anyway we know who you are, what you are about, spreading fear.

Big Pharma don't NEED anything, it's their choice as to when to take the risk to apply funds, they will then need P1B and P2 to get it into market but they do not NEED anything to starting talking and acting. It's all about risk:reward for them, th erisk has been decreasing, they now understand that there is biological evidence of efficacy, is it to FDA standard yet, no, good enough to make a decision, probably.

You really exposing yourself here you know.

Surely the whole point with investing is to be in before it rises, everything we are seeing is making it more and more likely to be a sucess, if we were already at the point where everything was proven the price wouldn't be here and there'd be less reason to invest.

There will be a shout of 'house' in there somewhere, either because one of them used all of them in the same post, or they think that buying a house is idicative of the failure of 6k. The effect will be the same, nada.

breast cancer will always be a newsworthy story, people don't know sts, and prostate cancer has too much of the ******** about it and lets face it, it affects older men.

The importance of the C6 dose will not be recognised by most people, I suspect very few outside of us, i.e. new money.

It's the only part that they think is worth anything, i.e. ditching stc, labskin, rhino just leaves MW?

I'd not paid that much attention to the history of the board prior to this, I will now, I doubt he's still watching, but the constant uplifting chat about the company followed by 'it's in the RNS' response to any questions at all, should have been a massive warning sign and often it was the absence of it in the RNS that was the key point, china in particular. He walked a very very fine line, not sure if he was always on the right side, can I prove he wasn't, no I can't.

Re: the MoU how do you know that there wasn't one? They don't mean a lot, could easily have been abandoned with no further action, China's view of human, animal and nature's rights is wobbly at best so would they really spend all that money? So a few million die due to poor quality water, so what, the gov won't get voted out, they'll deny it internally and externally, or blame the west. Again a sign I should have seen, don't expect business to come off with countries that don't care about what you are selling the solution for, or indeed that recognise patents, I was prepared for the copying risk though I expected that long term that business would die off as it was reverse engineered.

If you can't make a profit from ensuring that animal testing is not needed then the solution is wrong, you should have such a ready market for it, although the situation where if you have animal tested ever then you can't claim to be clean of testing does not help, there is literally no incentive for the big players to stop testing as they cannot be certified.

Unless you are trying to contain COVID then what's the point in a test, there's no specific treatment. So no need to test to say that treatment x is best.

There is logic to the conjecture but it's not from the company.

Where did 25 come from they have said mid 24 anything else is conjecture by investors.

You can feel let down all you want, but to say that it's not known why is disingenuous. The gov were spamming requests left right and centre for 'stuff' we offered up some 'stuff', they chose other options, that may not have been technically as good, may not have been UK based (that was something they sai dthey wanted). So they went no further. This was something that we chose to try and take advantage of, the orders weren't there for us, if we'd run handjobs pub then maybe.

If you remember the market was flooded with millions/billions of cheap chinese tests that didn't need approving, and were classed as 'good enough' even if that was only to give psychological comfort.

If you remember the S&S were better than anything else available, and that's also how we know that the chinese tests were poor.

If you remember porton down processed possibly 0 tests using frozen samples, and moved to a deskside exercise where they also processed 0 tests, I heard of no passes and no failures during that period. We actually moved to getting approval in spain instead of the UK.

So not knowing why is very very disingenuous, but that's not a surprise.

If you remember the affimers are in the near term a DX tech, longer term affyxel might use some, so it's marginally important to the business case as near term the expectation is that TX is far far bigger than DX. But you know that as well don't you.

You mean they'll do the same as every single AGM ever for any company in terms of getting agreement. There's nothing sinister.

Was in, now out, expecting to confess back in again. Perhaps the reason for accepting sub optimal prices is to essentially get their clients bought into using black mass and therefore adjusting their processes internally and making it more difficult to revert to their old raw material. Whereas auctioning would not provide that steady flow that a customer needs in order to make adaptations. This may get longer term customers that are worth more than a short term higher sale price.

So eggy are you going to hump or attack Myles if he's there?

Is that like you with 'all's well, but...' in nearly every comment, just a misunderstandin?

You ok hun? Got in too early hun? Didn't read between the lines that there can be short term variations in price?

I thought you'd only been here since Jan 23. So who were you then?

Cost effective Vs cheap Chinese imports and bungs. Never going to happen.

WTF are you are on about?