We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
Safe diagnositcs? Interesting.
although a bloke in my village did end up with sepsis following a prostate biopsy, but I think that would be needed regardless.
I think he was very very careful 'It's all in the RNS' was his usual social media response.
If you are going to report it you need evidence and examples, and remember sometimes demonstrations in china, for instance, don't lead to anything that's not fraud. Personal opinion he's been duplicitous, but just on the right side of the line.
Sol, the mess he left has taken a while to be seen for what is by the looks of it, although the question 'do we have the money we think we should have, or even close to that' so the board is to blame to not preventing it, but in the same way that the police are not responsible for a murderer murdering, the person who created the situation where it all went wrong is responsible for it being wrong, that's GB. End of. Where's the china contracts, or even any news from china at all? Other Govs were interested, no news, Labskin was going great guns, now it can't make a profit? STC overwhelmed with demand, again no profit.
I got suspicous when his answers on twitter were always 'it's in the RNS' to any query about contracts, and obvioulsy the RNS contained nothing about it, so he wasn't lying, there were future looking statements and we'll probably find that these were couched very carefully but sounded like likely future business etc. I was not suspicous enough however.
The problem with woods and muggins is that there are similar people bleating like that on almost every small stock, and they have no legal obligation to speak the truth. The board did have that obligation and yet they did not, there may be consequences, but i'm not hopeful about that. Weighing up who to believe, someone who can happily lie (and may enjoy the disruption) vs someone who will be penalised for lying i'd go for the latter.
They no longer offer PSA in Lincs/Leics as they are too inaccurate.
I nearly sold this morning...
Sorry Timster, honestly thought that was him responding.
Not sure who you are talking to, I for one have never said anything of that sort, also don't have a daughter. It's just a waiting game now, sit back, watch the scrabbling from those that shorted.
We will not know as much as they do. I'm not aware of anything happening so no they haven't. The risk is decreasing the likelihood of increasing, until there is an offer there isn't one.
Anyway we know who you are, what you are about, spreading fear.
Big Pharma don't NEED anything, it's their choice as to when to take the risk to apply funds, they will then need P1B and P2 to get it into market but they do not NEED anything to starting talking and acting. It's all about risk:reward for them, th erisk has been decreasing, they now understand that there is biological evidence of efficacy, is it to FDA standard yet, no, good enough to make a decision, probably.
You really exposing yourself here you know.
Surely the whole point with investing is to be in before it rises, everything we are seeing is making it more and more likely to be a sucess, if we were already at the point where everything was proven the price wouldn't be here and there'd be less reason to invest.
There will be a shout of 'house' in there somewhere, either because one of them used all of them in the same post, or they think that buying a house is idicative of the failure of 6k. The effect will be the same, nada.
breast cancer will always be a newsworthy story, people don't know sts, and prostate cancer has too much of the ******** about it and lets face it, it affects older men.
The importance of the C6 dose will not be recognised by most people, I suspect very few outside of us, i.e. new money.
It's the only part that they think is worth anything, i.e. ditching stc, labskin, rhino just leaves MW?
I'd not paid that much attention to the history of the board prior to this, I will now, I doubt he's still watching, but the constant uplifting chat about the company followed by 'it's in the RNS' response to any questions at all, should have been a massive warning sign and often it was the absence of it in the RNS that was the key point, china in particular. He walked a very very fine line, not sure if he was always on the right side, can I prove he wasn't, no I can't.
Re: the MoU how do you know that there wasn't one? They don't mean a lot, could easily have been abandoned with no further action, China's view of human, animal and nature's rights is wobbly at best so would they really spend all that money? So a few million die due to poor quality water, so what, the gov won't get voted out, they'll deny it internally and externally, or blame the west. Again a sign I should have seen, don't expect business to come off with countries that don't care about what you are selling the solution for, or indeed that recognise patents, I was prepared for the copying risk though I expected that long term that business would die off as it was reverse engineered.
If you can't make a profit from ensuring that animal testing is not needed then the solution is wrong, you should have such a ready market for it, although the situation where if you have animal tested ever then you can't claim to be clean of testing does not help, there is literally no incentive for the big players to stop testing as they cannot be certified.
Unless you are trying to contain COVID then what's the point in a test, there's no specific treatment. So no need to test to say that treatment x is best.
There is logic to the conjecture but it's not from the company.
Where did 25 come from they have said mid 24 anything else is conjecture by investors.
You can feel let down all you want, but to say that it's not known why is disingenuous. The gov were spamming requests left right and centre for 'stuff' we offered up some 'stuff', they chose other options, that may not have been technically as good, may not have been UK based (that was something they sai dthey wanted). So they went no further. This was something that we chose to try and take advantage of, the orders weren't there for us, if we'd run handjobs pub then maybe.
If you remember the market was flooded with millions/billions of cheap chinese tests that didn't need approving, and were classed as 'good enough' even if that was only to give psychological comfort.
If you remember the S&S were better than anything else available, and that's also how we know that the chinese tests were poor.
If you remember porton down processed possibly 0 tests using frozen samples, and moved to a deskside exercise where they also processed 0 tests, I heard of no passes and no failures during that period. We actually moved to getting approval in spain instead of the UK.
So not knowing why is very very disingenuous, but that's not a surprise.
If you remember the affimers are in the near term a DX tech, longer term affyxel might use some, so it's marginally important to the business case as near term the expectation is that TX is far far bigger than DX. But you know that as well don't you.