We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
Pigster that's 1in 6 that it's a 6 and 5 in 6 that it's not, ie 16% and 84%. Again binary that is a 6 or not a 6 but there are 5 ways/opportunities of getting not a 6.
This is really basic probability.
It is binary but it's not 50:50, they are two different things.
The update is, it's not been found yet.
If one of them bids others will follow, their life will be easier with it than with a competitor having it.
Re the clipping there's a character that LSE doesn't like might be pct can't recall.
Touk, you're right, they should just spike the 6k with some native dox and watch the toxicities arrive then we'd be all done and never know if more could have been applied. Or they could fake the MTD arrival in some other way just to achieve a tick in a box.
For clarity, I've no issue with Investors speculating on potential sales, market sizes etc. How else would we know if where we are now is cheap or not (is very very cheap right now in my opinion)
Touk if you don't trust the management then why are you invested?
Note that for the LFT ALL of the estimates for scale came from investors not management. All management said was that it was accurate and they were going through a process. That process later turned out to be corrupt. They tried to get approval by other channels so were doing the right things.
But if you really believe that it was incompetence then sell, or at least derisk, how can anyone be invested in a company where they don't trust the management.
With fewer side effects the actual cost will be a lot lower even if if the drug prices were the same.
No, I think * **** ******* *** ******* ****
LDA, are you a simpleton?
If you have a personal relationship then perhaps telling him that the Comms don't seem to have improved from down here works be better than putting down the efforts than they have made. I'm sure he'd prefer that than you being negative on a public forum.
Touk doesn't keep up, or even pay attention really, I'm not sure there's any point in pointing out his obvious lack of knowledge.
Ice you can say the same about pharma3 and livedata both add zero.
Life's only comments in recent days has been MTD as if avacta can control when it is found, I mean they could byv making ava6k worse, just dumping doxy everywhere, but why would they.
Pharma3's comments have been dissected earlier, and again are equally whiny.
So be magnanimous in your distribution of comments that people aren't adding to the discussion, as many threads are started with that sole intention by the looks of it.
I know who I'm waiting to see, let's see if they turn up.
Surely there is a path where 1 person shows signs so they have to add 3 more in to confirm? But if more than 1 had shown signs then we'd likely know by now, depending on when it occurred.
Short term LFTs, plural, are revenue, existing revenue streams to be expanded on.
Biosearch
They allowed to talk about other things whilst some of the team work with patients are having doses administered.
Not found yet. They are getting on with it, and it either might have been found, and they are confirming with more people, or there are no signs and there will be a Cohort 7 at which point there will be a MTD or something determined to use instead.
Surely this is all obvious? It's basic comprehension.
What about the MTD?
C2H...
https://avacta.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Avacta-AGM-2023-presentations.pdf
Page 26 will give you some of the numbers you're looking for.