Member Info for 13thmonkey

I would argue that any fund that works in this sector has people on the books who know more than the top 1-2% on here, certainly more than me.
Also today and for the next few weeks at least the share price action would like exactly the same whether there are 1000 funds interested and wanting to buy or there is no interest at all. Simply because they will not move that quickly.

Absolutely BV.

And who is? Look at many major execs and there's a cluster F in the wings. Any of BT's for the last decade, any of the banks forever. Any pharma that has allowed the patent cliff to get as close as it is. The pharma that allowed the talc issue. Any of the oil and gas companies for not reading the room, and car manufacturers that went too late into electric. Those are the mainstays of the corporate world, and yet all of them have had execs that failed, or were seemingly successful because of a following wind. Those 'good' execs probably made hay, and got out, didn't actually achieve a lot more than anyone else could have, and the boards that put them there and selected them are just as bad.
My argument is that there are no good high level exec's just ones that get lucky and have good timing. Elon is possibly an exception.

No idea, but orphan drugs are for conditions that are rare enough that there is little development in the treatment space. I suspect that fast tracking is not limited to those conditions.

On their website

Been there since about 17:15 on Friday.

They won't give that opinion until later in the trials, if we draw our own conclusions that's our problem, but to come out and say 'this means...' is not possible at this stage in the trial.

IIs are slow to assess, every decision will need a full layer of **** covering as everyone in the chain has to answer to someone above and losses are poorly received. I'd think that some of them might have been on the ball with a conditional approval to invest but most of suggest will be a month away.

To be fair you've said practically everything that might or might not happen around with some bs that can't happen. I think you've not yet said that aliens could land and give us a simple cure.

1.5 days? Wtf are you on about?

It's the nomads judgment as to whether this is new from a materiality standpoint. There will be nuances to the definition. Personally I'm far more interested in what we've been told Vs when we've been told compared to other people who will have a very slow process and are vital to the growth of the SP.

Yep, out today.

BITL, don't abuse him but asking to explain things he doesn't understand the implications of

The patient must have children that they would otherwise have never gotten to see. And maybe a parent that they are caring for.

I agree, and as an analog more people can be interested.

That's your opinion. There will be nuances to the definition of material that it is up to the nomad to understand and justify if needed.
I recently worked on some regulatory reporting, there is a definition of optional used. This was taken to mean you don't have to fill it in. What they actually mean is conditional. So the regulatory definition of words might be subtly different to the colloquial definition.

I think it's important to remember that the 3996 is an analog to velcade, so whilst it's great that it's dropping it's payload precisely, that payload will have a longer and harder approval journey than 6000 as it's not just a delivery mechanism. Unless that analog is already approved or in process of getting approved.

It'll be out and better than 50:1 tumour to blood

Any evidence for that?

What did you expect, II's running out of the room before it's finished shouting buy-buy? Even if they had of done that what would we have heard?, practically nothing as to buy in volume would take several days to work the orders through. And that precludes NDAs and agreements not to act until later.