Member Info for 13thmonkey

What's the option, write to the FCA, that's been done with shed loads of evidence.
These are the rules of the game, they might change in the future but these are the rules right now.
If they are that much of a risk then play a different game. I certainly wouldn't be on AIM for a 5% divi, for growth that is in the realm of 5-10%, not worth the risk. I'd only invest on aim where there is a chance of much much more.
However, looking at the main index, I lost a shedload on barclays when they were forced to buy another bank that was failing. Look at BT's graph down from 500 to sub 200. So would I invest in single companies on the main indexes, probably not, Risk exists everywhere. Look at 10% inflation and what that's doing to money under the matress.

Safebreaker, do people accept it, probably not, but it's the risk that has to be taken as those here can do absolutely nothing about it, other than not invest. But when you see something that you think is special in the longer term that's the price that you might have to pay.

If II's are going to get on board then we still wouldn't know about it, it'll be at least 4 weeks after SD, maybe more, they will have internal processes. However we need to look at scale, lets suggest that they invest £15m, roughly 5% of the companies MCap, that's going to need additional approval as it's a decent chunk of a company, but what's the upside, maybe hitting £150m, so £135m profit if they sold which would be tricky without dropping the price. £135m is a nice lump of profit but it's not enormous, not for big IIs. Reality is they'll be working at sub 5%, so to be meaningful that'll be the smaller IIs.
I used to work at an investment/insurance co. in procurement and reg reporting, and I asked about smaller company investing after a company wide presentation ra ra session. They do have teams that focus on smaller scale businesses and they do have expertise to understand what was said.

So eggy had turned up I see, at least once possibly twice.

Dollar to pound?

There's no accounting for increasing market size due to better tolerability and more cycles being achievable.

Yet another nail in UK PLCs coffin.

Which special unit size?

Cleaving just means it's found the FAPa, the question is are the tumours in question susceptible to dox. And technically are aren't and dox is not recommended as a treatment for them.
But, and this is my personal conjecture, if dox is as nasty as it is when it hits the skin (see the images of injection site damage when injecting goes wrong), then i'm quite sure it will do a lot of damage to the tumour, and the only reason it's not recommended is that ithe tumour isn't more susceptible to dox than normal tissue is, so to get enough into the tumour (pre AVA) would kill the patient.

Holding it as a scoop for the the journo that topped and tailed the SD?

Uber has never made a profit. 37bn of rev bags can't make a profit from selling a software service. I'll take their mcap.

CBA, having a long lunch break.

Waggy, I disagree with your statement that they have made no money to date.
They have not made much, but they have made money, they have had milestone payments, that is someone paying for their knowledge and expertise, it's not selling to consumers but that's never going to be the case. Their income stream will be license agreements with milestone payments and royalties.

Isn't always about the future price, if the future price is equal to today's price and you see no way of that changing then (with the exception of dividends) why would you carry on holding? You might get lucky and the SP rises above what it's worth, but that will undo itself. This is all about the cost of money, is the likelihood of an increase of a certain size on a certain timeframe worth more to me than the cash in hand or the cash in some other potential increase.
My cash where it is I can see a route to it being worth many many times what it is now in a 2-3 year time frame, that's the value calc for me. If it was 10 years I'd make a different decision. If it was worth just 25% more I'd make a different decision. But that's investing, either doing those calcs explicitly or having an implicit assessment.

You've got a logic to your pricing, attack the logic not the person. The only avenues of attack are the multiple and the total sales, both of which have sound logic behind them. That's not ramping, that's understanding what you are looking at.

how do you 'get that impression' they don't even know what one of the targets is.

Apparently say that they have a right of centre slant on the world when it comes to people whose origin is different from theirs.

Terry, he has credibility to lose, you, not so much. TW none whatsoever, Truant and eggy, haven't a brain cell between them. Just ****** stains on society.

Sitlain I thought that they had not been pre-treated with dox specifically, anthracycline naïve?

He is a bully, no doubt about that.