Ben Richardson, CEO at SulNOx, confident they can cost-effectively decarbonise commercial shipping. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
I think Quady should have done the website.
He, after all, has been doing websites and corporate mergers for 40 years. He was doing websites before there was a World Wide Web. And was the first ever login to Xtube.
Anything other than a sale and I’m voting Caldwell down
He and his crew have done literally nothing to stabilise or increase the share price. Where do they dig up these duds year after year?
At least under Mather we had price increase and newsflow
Going nowhere...day after day...
Popped today on a UT of 500...yes FIVE HUNDRED...shares...slid back to its stuck range around 14.50...
Scott is doing nothing so we're counting on metals prices or a return to normal volumes as the month goes on...
PIs account for a lot of stock here...our vote could be the swing factor at the AGM...but we've been bored into submission...
So if BHP AND NCM (now Newmont) want to mount a vote to dump the whole Board, I'm up for that...
(Remember they ALL now need to seek re-election...)
But he hasn't posted or commented on anything on Linked In for 8 months...
Well at least he up to date with what’s been going on.
Anyone come across this Guy? Sebastian Eguez.
"Comunicación en SolGold Ecuador"
But he hasn't posted or commented on anything on Linked In for 8 months...
The recorded presentation can be found here...............in just over 2 days time :)
https://www.goldforumamericas.com/company-session/2943/
Scott is in Denver today... delivering his 20 mins presentation at the Gold forum... then spending the next 2 days there handing out his CV, knowing he is toast come the AGM.....
But the Projects section DOES include the Cornerstone projects...
12 concessions in 7 projects cf 46 concessions in 10 SOLG projects...
Plus Cascabel of course...
You really couldn't make this up!!!
The latest Corporate Video is delivered by...DARRYL CUZZUBBO!!!!!!!!!!
WTF is going on...or not going on...what are you actually doing Scott!!!???
Rcgl, suddenly the appointment becomes more interesting.
I wrote to them to vent my frustrations - for what it is worth!!!!!
Anybody else taken any action(s)?
Correct, because carbon excess isn’t a problem it’s just a tool to use to control the morons who lap it up
Why give Carbon credits to polluting companies?
IMHO the schemes will never be linked. There's too much money to be made from the mugs who've been brainwashed by the MMGW scam. Even if it was happening, how can it be justified for the companies producing the most CO2 to still make huge profits and even expand business and the amount they pollute? It's all about money and control and the true environmental problems are overlooked. If the Davos crowd were really concerned about the environment, the first agreement would be banning private jets and private flights. It's never going to happen. Those with the biggest Carbon footprints are dictating to rest of us to change our lifestyle, while they just pay to continue their luxury extravagant Carbon excesses.
Anyone else feeling a bit short changed st the last 12 years? / $ multiple millions
Anyone else feeling a bit short changed at the last 9 months/$30m?
Have
It cant of cost a great deal of money Add... its a standard , off the shelf web site... with very few pages...
Its just incredible it took so long... and clearly doesn't come as part of any ground breaking news/update as some had suggested it would.
Worthy of just a shrug of the shoulders... as was to be expected.
Looks like an example of displacement activity. What a monumental waste of time and money.
We’re more likely to sell it to someone who will mine it without a second thought to clown world greenonomics
Madpunter, I don't think you understand carbon credit trading.
Companies that polute are assigned carbon credits, more can be brought or sold.
The problem at the moment is not all carbon credit trading schemes are joined up
So each jurisdiction has it's own scheme.
However with a net zero mine.
If Solgold was part of a carbon credit scheme, then that would be another revenue stream for Solgold.
However I doubt that will be the case.
We are more likely to carbon sink our emissions.
Some better, standardised, professional photos of the team would have been a bit more of a corporate feel.
As it is, Nick looks like a cross between Barry Cryer and Henry Kissinger.
Dan Vujcic looks like he took a selfie at the last minute.
As far as web design goes, this looks like £179 worth. It's not terrible but it doesn't reflect well on a half a billion £ company.
From another share chat (JLP)
Codelco ends long – term mined copper deals to China clients from 2025 – sources
LONDON, Sept 15 (Reuters) – Chile's Codelco is ending long-term contracts to sell copper concentrate to Chinese clients from 2025, bidding to broaden its product offering to them after evaluating its production outlook, five sources with direct knowledge of the matter said. The sources said Codelco is aiming to replace exclusively copper concentrate deals with others that include concentrate and value-added intermediate products such as blister and anode which are derived from concentrate and can be turned into copper metal or cathode.
Some Chinese customers have protested against the changes, but will have to accept new contract negotiations that include intermediates because they will need Codelco's concentrates at a time when deficits are expected, the sources said. The Chilean miner wants to restructure its sales strategy and agreements because of uncertainty about whether it can meet its contractual obligations, the sources said. "Some measures adopted are due to the normal management of Codelco's commercial product portfolio and not to availability adjustments and/or lower production," Codelco said in response to a request for a comment. Codelco continually updates its contracts according to the prevailing dynamics in the market." Operational problems at the state-owned miner saw its production slip last year to about 1.46 million metric tons, the lowest in around a quarter of a century and output has slipped further this year.
Codelco is expected to produce between 1.31 million to 1.35 million metric tons of copper a key material for the power and construction industries. Output at the world's largest copper producer has been dropping despite $15 billion invested in flagship mines including El Teniente and Chuquicamata where costs have overrun significantly, according to an influential industry body. The sources, all of whom have long-term contracts with Codelco, said they had been receiving termination notices from Codelco from July to August and that the company wanted to start new agreements with different terms. Two of the sources said Codelco was ending their evergreen supply contracts from 2025. Evergreen contracts introduced by Codelco in 2018 are two-year and three-year deals which roll over annually, in which customers can be assured of certain amounts a year.
Codelco accounts for 29% of Chile's copper production. Chile's congressional committee in late August launched an investigation to review Codelco's corporate structure and project delays. China is the world's biggest buyer of mined copper with its import volume accounting for over 60% of the world's total.
The global copper concentrate marketIS EXPECTED TO SEE A STEEP DEFICIT during 2025-2027 as Asian and African smelters ramp up capacity, outpacing mine supply.
Unfortunately the need for carbon neutrality and the need for metals for the push to green energy at not compatible
Somebody’s 0 has got to go
It will be countries with resources that will be forced to abandon this madness first
The Big Q - How are we going to fund and build a net zero Carbon neutral mine?
How about SOLG protecting the environment at Cascabel by not building a mine. Instead SOLG could charge a load of eco loons protection money equivalent to what SOLG would get from mining?
No doubt you'll suggest that they buy Carbon credits. What if every business buys Carbon credits. There's not enough land to keep planting forests as Carbon sinks. Every environmental solution has a price to pay. You don't get anything for nothing. The previous example of planting trees results in the loss of other habitats. Carbon trading has no central register as far as I know, so it's nothing more than protection money. Who would know if a company sold Carbon credits for planting a forest in some remote spot, then selling the same credits to companies in different countries? Dr Shiva who invented email, states that a $100bn fund was set up to promote MMGW and that Carbon trading will be worth $125tn, information that he sourced in the Wikileaks.
Very similar to the site Adnet made for Foran. No surprise though, is it? Only a mug or straw-clutcher would believe that an update to the website would be the precursor to 'big news'. Even the mention of this non-event was just SC trying to keep the conspiracy theorists happy whilst he bumbles through his actual job. And the usual suspects here diligently bought the story and awaited their rewards. Hands up- you know who you are!
For the hundredth time, dyor, learn the risks faced by an explorer and (unless you're ramping for a living) don't pretend this is going anywhere soon. Bottom drawer, forget about it, don't post every day. Make some money elsewhere in the meantime.